Essay
Essay: How do Mary Shelley and Margaret Atwood portray the narrator in Frankenstein and The Handmaid's Tale?
- Course
- Institution
A* marked practice essay for Unit-2, prose for the Pearson Edexcel English Literature A-level.
[Show more]
2 reviews
By: blewisemily • 10 months ago
By: lani • 1 year ago
Seller
Follow
abbiemccracken810
Reviews received
Content preview
The handmaids taleEssay on the narrator
In Margret Atwood’s ‘The handmaids tale’, the main character is Offred, a handmaid in the fictitious
totalitarian theocracy of Gilead. However, she also provides the main narrative voice of the novel,
and therefore what we learn about the society in which she lives derives completely from her
thoughts, opinions, memories of the past and experiences in the present. Atwood’s use of the
metanarrative also tells the reader that her narration is not completely reliable; it is a construct, a
story. Equally, Offred also gives a female view, consciously crafted by Atwood in order to convey her
own opinions of feminism and the balance of power between men and women, which reflects the
uncertainty that women faced in the 1980’s, at the time Atwood was writing. At this time, it was yet
unclear whether women would ever be equal to men in terms of sectors work and pay; with the rise
of second wave feminists such as Offred’s mother fighting for such equality with some success. She is
essentially an ‘everywoman’, an expansive representation of the effect that such a controlling
society can have on a person’s mentality and behaviour.
As mentioned previously, Offred is the main narrator in the novel, she speaks in first person, though
tends to add the voices of other characters from her own memory. In terms of manipulation of
language, Offred’s name is, in itself, a patronym; she takes the name of her current commander
‘Fred’. The construction of this fabricated name , with the prefix ‘Off’, followed by the suffix of the
commander’s name ‘Fred’, shows the way that she has to take the name of a man, instead of having
an identity of her own. The fact that the composition of the name is generic to all handmaids,
‘Ofglen’ for example, makes this all the more worse- not only does she have no identity, but her
identity is shared among the other handmaids. This depicts the literal subordination of women
through the use of language. She states quite clearly ‘My name isn’t Offred. I have another name,
which nobody uses now’, her decided surety in the contraction ‘isn’t’, followed by the use of the
pronoun ‘nobody’ emphasises the knowledge that she no longer has any control over identity, she
has become government property, and ‘nobody’ knows who she really is, apart from her
reproductive functions, her ‘viable ovaries’. However, to her, her name is very precious ‘like an
amulet, some charm that’s survived from an unimaginably distant past’. Furthermore, the use of the
simile to compare her name to an ‘amulet’ conveys to the reader that she views her name as
something of significant value, like a preserved historic amulet. Equally, her view of the past as
‘unimaginably distant’ is hyperbolic , as the adverb ‘unimaginably’ makes the distance between her
life in Gilead and her life in the ‘time before’ seem unrealistically large, considering that it has
actually only been three years in real time. Therefore, Offred’s narration provides us with an
insightful view of how it feels for her to have her identity removed, and her lack of identity makes
her more relatable to a larger number of people, women in particular. Despite this, the fact that her
emotions influence her words, causing her to over-dramatize and overreact shows that she is not a
wholly reliable narrator. However, this lack of reliability also makes her seems like a much more
realistic narrator, particularly as real people never speak the complete and absolute truth, especially
when trying to recall something emotionally traumatising. This believability makes Atwood’s
messages about control of identity and powers within governments seem all the strong. As with
many dystopian novels, Atwood draws on the political conditions at the time she was writing; the
novel draws on ideology from The American new right movement in the 1980’s, a conservative
coalition which supported ideals of anti-feminism, anti-homosexuality and racism. The new right
aimed to return to traditional and puritanist ideas, under the influence of reaganism (the support of
President Ronald Reagan). Hence, Atwood has over exaggerated relevant political issues and
therefore portrays Offred as a nameless narrator, as she believed that if such ideology were to come
The benefits of buying summaries with Stuvia:
Guaranteed quality through customer reviews
Stuvia customers have reviewed more than 700,000 summaries. This how you know that you are buying the best documents.
Quick and easy check-out
You can quickly pay through EFT, credit card or Stuvia-credit for the summaries. There is no membership needed.
Focus on what matters
Your fellow students write the study notes themselves, which is why the documents are always reliable and up-to-date. This ensures you quickly get to the core!
Frequently asked questions
What do I get when I buy this document?
You get a PDF, available immediately after your purchase. The purchased document is accessible anytime, anywhere and indefinitely through your profile.
Satisfaction guarantee: how does it work?
Our satisfaction guarantee ensures that you always find a study document that suits you well. You fill out a form, and our customer service team takes care of the rest.
Who am I buying this summary from?
Stuvia is a marketplace, so you are not buying this document from us, but from seller abbiemccracken810. Stuvia facilitates payment to the seller.
Will I be stuck with a subscription?
No, you only buy this summary for R168,23. You're not tied to anything after your purchase.
Can Stuvia be trusted?
4.6 stars on Google & Trustpilot (+1000 reviews)
66579 documents were sold in the last 30 days
Founded in 2010, the go-to place to buy summaries for 14 years now