100% satisfaction guarantee Immediately available after payment Both online and in PDF No strings attached
logo-home
HMPYC80 2023 Research Reveiw Inventory (RRI revised criteria) R50,00
Add to cart

Exam (elaborations)

HMPYC80 2023 Research Reveiw Inventory (RRI revised criteria)

 160 views  8 purchases

GUIDE on the 2023 RRI revised criteria and how to apply it to documents. Contains definitions and examples for easy use of the Research Review Inventory.

Preview 3 out of 27  pages

  • April 4, 2023
  • 27
  • 2022/2023
  • Exam (elaborations)
  • Questions & answers
All documents for this subject (165)
avatar-seller
PerfectionistNotes
RESEARCH METHODOLOGY

HMPYC80


RRI REVISED CRITERIA GUIDE



Perfectionist Notes
PRIVATE TUTOR FOR HONOURS IN PSYCHOLOGY - UNISA




helping you achieve your best results

,HOW TO USE THE RESEARCH REVIEW INVENTORY (revised)
The review inventory consists of a number of items, numbered sequentially from 1 up to 58.
For research proposals: 1-45.

You can download the UNISA version on MyUnisa. Document title: “Review Log for the
Research Review Inventory MS WORD FILE Unisa HMPYC80”.

RATING SCALE :
Items should be reviewed and rated on a three-point rating scale from 1 to 3.

The ratings are defined as follows:

1: Absent, incorrect, or completely wrong.

2: Only partially addressed. It does not attain the item requirement or criteria.

3: Sufficiently up to standard in terms of the item criteria.

Every relevant item should be reviewed and rated on this three-point scale (1 to 3).



KEEP A RECORD OF YOUR ANSWERS
Use the R.R.I. (revised): Review Log to document and keep a record of your ratings ON THE
ONLINE SITE

REVIEWER COMMENTS AND THE FEEDBACK REPORT
Each rating is associated with general comments.
For example, suppose a reviewer reviews a particular proposal and gives a rating of “3” for the
clarification of the proposed study. The general comment would be: “The research question is
formulated. A research question is derived from the research issue.”



IMPORTANT NOTES
Remember, where the item criterion is not explicitly addressed then allocate a low rating (1).
Good academic writing is clear and transparent. If a reader needs to guess at whether an issue
has been implemented and addressed or not, then the writing is neither clear nor transparent.
Only give a high rating (3) if the item criteria have been explicitly addressed.

, Property of Perfectionist Notes
Plagiarism/distribution/illegal use/selling of these notes will be prosecuted

Guide for RESEARCH REVIEW INVENTORY
A. THE TITLE
Title of the article:
______________________________________________________________________________________________________________
01. The title contains at least one central psychological construct from the research proposal or
study.



What is a psychological construct?
Intelligence, motivation, anxiety, and fear are all examples of constructs. In psychology, a
construct is a skill, attribute, or ability that is based on one or more established theories.



EXAMPLE Answer:
The influence of emotional intelligence and resilience on work engagement amongst nurses in
public hospitals
Therefore it meets the criteria.
=3
______________________________________________________________________________________________________________
02. The title indicates the research setting or demographic information of the sample
population.

Any one of the following is sufficient: where, who, when, under what circumstances, or the
phenomenon that is being investigated.

EXAMPLE Answer:
This title indicates:
where = public hospitals
who = nurses
phenomenon = emotional intelligence and resilience on work engagement
Therefore it meets the criteria.
=3
______________________________________________________________________________________________________________
03. The title points to, or refers to, the research method, design or paradigm.
This may be signalled by a keyword or phrase such as: “lived experiences”, “perceptions”,
“attitudes”, “constructions”, “discourses”, “quasi-experimental”, “critical study”, “psychometric
properties”, “correlational study”, “inferential study”, and so on.




2

The benefits of buying summaries with Stuvia:

Guaranteed quality through customer reviews

Guaranteed quality through customer reviews

Stuvia customers have reviewed more than 700,000 summaries. This how you know that you are buying the best documents.

Quick and easy check-out

Quick and easy check-out

You can quickly pay through EFT, credit card or Stuvia-credit for the summaries. There is no membership needed.

Focus on what matters

Focus on what matters

Your fellow students write the study notes themselves, which is why the documents are always reliable and up-to-date. This ensures you quickly get to the core!

Frequently asked questions

What do I get when I buy this document?

You get a PDF, available immediately after your purchase. The purchased document is accessible anytime, anywhere and indefinitely through your profile.

Satisfaction guarantee: how does it work?

Our satisfaction guarantee ensures that you always find a study document that suits you well. You fill out a form, and our customer service team takes care of the rest.

Who am I buying this summary from?

Stuvia is a marketplace, so you are not buying this document from us, but from seller PerfectionistNotes. Stuvia facilitates payment to the seller.

Will I be stuck with a subscription?

No, you only buy this summary for R50,00. You're not tied to anything after your purchase.

Can Stuvia be trusted?

4.6 stars on Google & Trustpilot (+1000 reviews)

53022 documents were sold in the last 30 days

Founded in 2010, the go-to place to buy summaries for 14 years now

Start selling
R50,00  8x  sold
  • (0)
Add to cart
Added