100% satisfaction guarantee Immediately available after payment Both online and in PDF No strings attached
logo-home
IOS2601 EXAM PACK 2023 R55,95   Add to cart

Exam (elaborations)

IOS2601 EXAM PACK 2023

 1 view  0 purchase

IOS2601 EXAM PACK 2023

Preview 4 out of 72  pages

  • May 15, 2023
  • 72
  • 2022/2023
  • Exam (elaborations)
  • Questions & answers
All documents for this subject (62)
avatar-seller
smillanih
IOS2601
EXAM PACK
2023
QUESTIONS AND
ANSWERS

,Question 1.4 = 1


Question 1.5 = 1


Question 1.6 = 2


Question 1.7 = 1


Question 1.8 = 2


Question 1.9 = 3


Question 1.10 = 1




2|Page

,An ordinary citizen may rely on the everyday meaning of legislation; therefor the courts

may not proceed beyond the plain meaning of the text. A dictionary must firstly be used

to settle interpretive questions.

The ‘golden rule’ of interpretation is that if the ‘plain meaning’ of words are ambiguous

(there exists more than one meaning of the word, in question, in the dictionary), vague

or misleading or if the strict literal interpretation would result in absurdity (Venter v R),

then the court may deviate to avoid such absurdity. The court will then turn to

‘secondary aids’ to interpret the intention of the legislator. ‘Secondary aids’ are the long

title of the statute, headings of chapters and sections, and the text in the other official

language etc. If the ‘secondary aids’ also do not lead to a satisfactory result, then the

court may refer to tertiary aids to interpretation. These tertiary aids are common law

presumptions that may be used. In these cases, the court will concedes that it cannot

determine what is intended by the legislature and that it will its own assumption about

what the legislature has intended.

The textual approach after 27 April 1994 (Interim Constitution came into effect)

The Appellate Division referred to with approval to the textual approach for statutory

interpretation in Swanepoel v Johannesburg City Council: “[T]he rules of statutory

[exegesis] are intended as aids in resolving any doubts as to the legislature’s true

intention. Where this intention is proclaimed in clear terms either expressly or by

necessary implication the assistance of these rules need not be sought.”

The Supreme Court of Appeal the traditional rule of interpretation in Commissioner,

SARS v executor, Frith’s Estate: “The primary rule in construction of a statutory



3|Page

, The purposive (text-in-context) approach

Even before 1994, the purposive approach was applied by the courts from time to time.

th
This approach dates back to 16 century English law and has resulted in a number of

important minority judgments.

The purpose of the legislation is the most important factor in terms of the text-in-context

approach. The law-text in context of surrounding circumstances, as well as social and

political considerations, is taken into account. The most important rule of the contextual

approach is the so-called mischief rule.




In Construction of Statutes, Elmer Driedger defines the mischief rule as follows: “A

statute is to be so construed as to suppress the mischief and advance the remedy, thus

giving the courts considerable latitude in achieving the objective of the legislature

despite any inadequacy in the language employed by it.”

External aids to interpretation must be applied from the beginning of the process of

interpretation. These aids and circumstances are indicative of the context wherein the

legislation was enacted by indicating what the main mischief was that the legislation

intended to address. The context can be researched by considering the legal position

before the legislation, the legal problem that existed, the new solutions brought about by

the statute and the reasons for the new legislation.

The contextual approach differs from the literal approach in the following respects:

 The wider context may be considered form the start.



4|Page

The benefits of buying summaries with Stuvia:

Guaranteed quality through customer reviews

Guaranteed quality through customer reviews

Stuvia customers have reviewed more than 700,000 summaries. This how you know that you are buying the best documents.

Quick and easy check-out

Quick and easy check-out

You can quickly pay through EFT, credit card or Stuvia-credit for the summaries. There is no membership needed.

Focus on what matters

Focus on what matters

Your fellow students write the study notes themselves, which is why the documents are always reliable and up-to-date. This ensures you quickly get to the core!

Frequently asked questions

What do I get when I buy this document?

You get a PDF, available immediately after your purchase. The purchased document is accessible anytime, anywhere and indefinitely through your profile.

Satisfaction guarantee: how does it work?

Our satisfaction guarantee ensures that you always find a study document that suits you well. You fill out a form, and our customer service team takes care of the rest.

Who am I buying this summary from?

Stuvia is a marketplace, so you are not buying this document from us, but from seller smillanih. Stuvia facilitates payment to the seller.

Will I be stuck with a subscription?

No, you only buy this summary for R55,95. You're not tied to anything after your purchase.

Can Stuvia be trusted?

4.6 stars on Google & Trustpilot (+1000 reviews)

72042 documents were sold in the last 30 days

Founded in 2010, the go-to place to buy summaries for 14 years now

Start selling
R55,95
  • (0)
  Buy now