A +
QUESTION 1
Carol, an owner of an exclusive bicycle shop advertised a special limited-edition bicycle
for sale, and invited the public to make offers for the bicycle. Jane and Portia were among
many people who submitted written offers for the bicycle. Jane’s offer was for R150 000,
and Portia’s offer was for R190 000. Although Carol intended to accept Portia’s offer, she
erroneously wrote a letter to Jane, wherein she accepted Jane’s offer. Jane believes that
an enforceable contract was concluded but Carol denies this. Apply the iustus error
doctrine and advise if a legally binding contract was concluded between Carol and Jane.
Discuss fully and refer to case law in your answer. Do not apply the Consumer Protection
Act 68 of 2008. [20]
QUESTIONS/ ANSWERS CONTINUE….
DISTINCTION Footnotes and/or Bibliography
GUARANTEED!!! included. *
Disclaimer
Extreme care has been used by our Tutors to draft this document, however the contents are provided “as is” without any representations or warranties, express or implied.
This document is to be used for comparison, research, and reference purposes ONLY. No part of this document may be reproduced, resold, or transmitted in any form or by
any means without prior written permission from the Author. By making use of this document, you agree to fully accept the consequences should you plagiarise or misuse
this document. – STUDY BUDDY TUTOR SA
PAST PAPERS & MEMOS, ASSIGNMENT MEMOS, NOTES, SUMMARIES & TUITONS.
Cell: 074 074 3729 Email: studybuddytutorsa@gmail.com
