100% satisfaction guarantee Immediately available after payment Both online and in PDF No strings attached
logo-home
SOCIAL COGNITION R120,28   Add to cart

Class notes

SOCIAL COGNITION

 6 views  0 purchase
  • Course
  • Institution

LECUTRE 2 OUT OF 6 IN THE LECTURE SERIES OF PSYCHOLOGY

Preview 2 out of 7  pages

  • September 6, 2023
  • 7
  • 2021/2022
  • Class notes
  • Larry
  • All classes
  • Unknown
avatar-seller
Week 2 – social cognition


Developmental and cross species research;
- Look at Tomasello paper: Understanding and Sharing Intentions
- Guided reading questions (by section number)
- 1. What is an intention?
- 2. What are 3 levels of intention understanding? +evidence
- 3. What are 3 levels of intention-sharing? +evidence
- 4. What skill do chimps lack? +evidence
- 5. What is Tomasello’s developmental hypothesis?
- 6. What are the alternative theories?
- THE TARGET ARTICLE IS THE FIRST 17 PAGES of paper

Opposition to Fodor’s Modularity Thesis;
- Anti-fodorian theories argue against specific mechanisms:
- Mental modules are:
- Domain specific
- Innate
- Fast & automatic
- Encapsulated
- Critics of modularity opt for processes that are:
- domain general
- learned (not innate)
- slower
- non-encapsulated

why study the black box?
- Noam Chomsky claimed that behaviorism couldn’t explain language
- Humans must have a unique cognitive tool for acquiring language
- Chomsky’s critics (e.g., Tomasello) need to:
- Argue against UG
- Argue for an alternative explanation

Arguments against UG;
- 1) Creole languages
- Linguists often embellish complexity of Creole languages
- 2) Linguistic universals
- Tendencies and Universals have been reduced to principals and parameters (Evans
and Levinson, 2009)
- Critics argue that these are hardly an innate grammar and aren’t very useful for
language acquisition
- 3) The critical period for language acquisition
- Evidence for a critical period is weak
- “Less is more”: Children learn language more effectively because they are limited in
what they can attend to, Dabrowska (1997)

, Dabrowska (1997);
- Showed why UG is a bad theory
- Ask adults of various educational backgrounds
to understand very complex sentences
- E.g., “It was King Louis who the general
convinced that this slave might speak to.”
- Who might the slave speak to?
- Who did the convincing?
- Who was convinced of something?
- So regardless of whether you were a native speaker it matters mostly on your
university education.
- Ug claims you have this innate knowledge and so a native speaker should
understand these complex sentences however, it was education level which made
the sentences easier to understand and so proves against UG.
- Formal education affects grammatical knowledge

Social cognition hypothesis;
- Can we explain language acquisition without UG?
- Tomasello argues that human social competence and intention-sharing lead to
language
- Social cognition is the “little difference that made a big difference” (Tomasello, 2005)
in human cognitive evolution.
- When we carry out actions, there are observable
indicators of our intentions (i.e., Looking at
object, acting with tools, reacting to outcomes)
- When doing this there are a lot of social correct
and relevant behaviours which occur. These are
all physically observable.
- There are also intentions and cognitive
behaviours happening in the person who is doing
the unboxing. He suggests these behaviours
come across before language in every type of
person.
Joint-attentional frames (or triadic engagement);
- 1. Person 1 attends to object/event
- 2. Person 2 attends to object/event
- 3. Person 1 & 2 realize that 1 & 2 are true
- 4. They communicate about object/event
- Uniquely human and very effective for learning words from
others
- Extremely effective for word-learning (Carpenter et al.,
1998)
- Children (1) notice these behaviours early on and
- (2) Come to understand the mental states (i.e., emotions, goals, and plans) of others
- (3) By 12 – 14 months, human children have access to a unique and powerful
mechanism for learning the meanings of words: joint-attentional frames

The benefits of buying summaries with Stuvia:

Guaranteed quality through customer reviews

Guaranteed quality through customer reviews

Stuvia customers have reviewed more than 700,000 summaries. This how you know that you are buying the best documents.

Quick and easy check-out

Quick and easy check-out

You can quickly pay through EFT, credit card or Stuvia-credit for the summaries. There is no membership needed.

Focus on what matters

Focus on what matters

Your fellow students write the study notes themselves, which is why the documents are always reliable and up-to-date. This ensures you quickly get to the core!

Frequently asked questions

What do I get when I buy this document?

You get a PDF, available immediately after your purchase. The purchased document is accessible anytime, anywhere and indefinitely through your profile.

Satisfaction guarantee: how does it work?

Our satisfaction guarantee ensures that you always find a study document that suits you well. You fill out a form, and our customer service team takes care of the rest.

Who am I buying this summary from?

Stuvia is a marketplace, so you are not buying this document from us, but from seller hannahnewton21. Stuvia facilitates payment to the seller.

Will I be stuck with a subscription?

No, you only buy this summary for R120,28. You're not tied to anything after your purchase.

Can Stuvia be trusted?

4.6 stars on Google & Trustpilot (+1000 reviews)

62555 documents were sold in the last 30 days

Founded in 2010, the go-to place to buy summaries for 14 years now

Start selling
R120,28
  • (0)
  Buy now