100% satisfaction guarantee Immediately available after payment Both online and in PDF No strings attached
Previously searched by you
LJU4801 OCTOBER NOVEMBER PORTFOLIO (COMPLETE ANSWERS) Semester 2 2024 - DUE 30 October 2024; 100% TRUSTED Complete, trusted solutions and explanations.R45,50
Add to cart
LJU4801 OCTOBER NOVEMBER PORTFOLIO (COMPLETE ANSWERS) Semester 2 2024 - DUE 30 October 2024; 100% TRUSTED Complete, trusted solutions and explanations.
LJU4801 OCTOBER NOVEMBER PORTFOLIO (COMPLETE ANSWERS) Semester 2 2024 - DUE 30 October 2024; 100% TRUSTED Complete, trusted solutions and explanations.
,DO NOT FORGET TO LEAVE A REVIEW. EVERY REVIEW MATTERS.
Question 1 Read the following scenario and then
answer the question below: The football governing
body is investigating Mark Pachio’s deliberate
handball during the quarter final match between
Shibobo FC and Maluti FC. Shibobo FC defender,
Pachio, used his hand to stop Mpho Motale’s header
on the line which would have sent Maluti FC through
to the semi-final. While Pachio was given a straight
red card for his actions, his 'Hand of God'
intervention ultimately paid-off as Maluti FC missed
the resulting penalty and Shibobo FC went through
to the semi-final after winning the shoot-out. Shibobo
FC does not consider that handball as unfair or
dishonest play but rather as an act for the higher
purpose of winning the game. Maluti FC, however,
sees the handball as unfair play which is
inconsistent with the fair play code. 1. Discuss the
different philosophical approaches being used here
(NB apply the approaches to the set of facts). In
your substantiated opinion, which approach is the
correct one? Your answer should not exceed 1250
words. (25) [25]
, In the scenario presented, we have a clear conflict
between two philosophical approaches regarding
sportsmanship, fairness, and ethics in the game of
football. The situation revolves around Mark
Pachio's deliberate handball, which raises critical
questions about the nature of fair play and the moral
implications of actions taken in the pursuit of
victory. This discussion will analyze two primary
philosophical approaches: consequentialism
(specifically utilitarianism) and deontological ethics,
before concluding with a substantiated opinion on
which approach is the correct one in this context.
Consequentialism (Utilitarianism)
Definition and Application: Consequentialism is a
moral philosophy that posits that the morality of an
action is determined by its outcomes. The most
common form of consequentialism is utilitarianism,
which advocates for actions that promote the
greatest good for the greatest number. In this
scenario, Shibobo FC's perspective aligns closely
with a utilitarian approach.
The benefits of buying summaries with Stuvia:
Guaranteed quality through customer reviews
Stuvia customers have reviewed more than 700,000 summaries. This how you know that you are buying the best documents.
Quick and easy check-out
You can quickly pay through EFT, credit card or Stuvia-credit for the summaries. There is no membership needed.
Focus on what matters
Your fellow students write the study notes themselves, which is why the documents are always reliable and up-to-date. This ensures you quickly get to the core!
Frequently asked questions
What do I get when I buy this document?
You get a PDF, available immediately after your purchase. The purchased document is accessible anytime, anywhere and indefinitely through your profile.
Satisfaction guarantee: how does it work?
Our satisfaction guarantee ensures that you always find a study document that suits you well. You fill out a form, and our customer service team takes care of the rest.
Who am I buying this summary from?
Stuvia is a marketplace, so you are not buying this document from us, but from seller Seller28. Stuvia facilitates payment to the seller.
Will I be stuck with a subscription?
No, you only buy this summary for R45,50. You're not tied to anything after your purchase.
