100% satisfaction guarantee Immediately available after payment Both online and in PDF No strings attached
Previously searched by you
LPL4802 OCTOBER NOVEMBER PORTFOLIO (COMPLETE ANSWERS) Semester 2 2024 - DUE 30 October 2024; 100% TRUSTED Complete, trusted solutions and explanations.R45,22
Add to cart
LPL4802 OCTOBER NOVEMBER PORTFOLIO (COMPLETE ANSWERS) Semester 2 2024 - DUE 30 October 2024; 100% TRUSTED Complete, trusted solutions and explanations.
LPL4802 OCTOBER NOVEMBER PORTFOLIO (COMPLETE ANSWERS) Semester 2 2024 - DUE 30 October 2024; 100% TRUSTED Complete, trusted solutions and explanations.
,QUESTION 1 (ESSAY) NATURE AND
ASSESSMENT OF NON-PATRIMONIAL LOSS
AND DAMAGES FOR PATRIMONIAL LOSS (4
pages, including rubric) PLEASE NOTE: You must
present your answer in the form of an essay. Its
marking rubric is attached with this examination
paper. Study the case Komape and others v Minister
of Basic Education and Others 2020 (2) SA 347
(SCA) a copy of it is attached here and answer the
questions below. N.B.: The question below must be
answered in the form of an essay. At the end of your
essay, attach the rubric that was supplied to you
along with your exam answer script. 1.1 Discuss
what the plaintiff needs to prove to be successful in
a claim for shock (psychiatric injury) as a head of
damage for non-patrimonial loss. Refer to relevant
authority in your answer. (15) 1.2 Critically analyse
the reasons (advanced by the court) why
Constitutional damages, claimed in addition to
common law damages, must at present necessarily
fail. (10) TOTAL MARKS FOR THIS QUESTION:
[25] 3
, To approach this essay, we’ll analyze two distinct
aspects based on the Komape case:
1. Non-patrimonial Loss: What the plaintiff needs
to establish in claiming shock (psychiatric
injury) as non-patrimonial damages.
2. Constitutional Damages: Why claims for
constitutional damages, alongside common law
damages, are unsuccessful in the present legal
framework.
Here’s an outline to help structure the essay
effectively:
Introduction
Introduce the context of the Komape case, touching
on the facts and importance of non-patrimonial and
constitutional damages within this case. Briefly set
up how the case addresses non-patrimonial damages
related to psychiatric injury claims and constitutional
damages, especially in human rights and educational
contexts.
The benefits of buying summaries with Stuvia:
Guaranteed quality through customer reviews
Stuvia customers have reviewed more than 700,000 summaries. This how you know that you are buying the best documents.
Quick and easy check-out
You can quickly pay through EFT, credit card or Stuvia-credit for the summaries. There is no membership needed.
Focus on what matters
Your fellow students write the study notes themselves, which is why the documents are always reliable and up-to-date. This ensures you quickly get to the core!
Frequently asked questions
What do I get when I buy this document?
You get a PDF, available immediately after your purchase. The purchased document is accessible anytime, anywhere and indefinitely through your profile.
Satisfaction guarantee: how does it work?
Our satisfaction guarantee ensures that you always find a study document that suits you well. You fill out a form, and our customer service team takes care of the rest.
Who am I buying this summary from?
Stuvia is a marketplace, so you are not buying this document from us, but from seller EducationHub20. Stuvia facilitates payment to the seller.
Will I be stuck with a subscription?
No, you only buy this summary for R45,22. You're not tied to anything after your purchase.