100% satisfaction guarantee Immediately available after payment Both online and in PDF No strings attached
logo-home
WJEC Criminology Unit 3 - AC2.5 Discuss the use of lay people in criminal cases R95,25   Add to cart

Other

WJEC Criminology Unit 3 - AC2.5 Discuss the use of lay people in criminal cases

37 reviews
 3266 views  23 purchases
  • Course
  • Institution

These are my my folder notes from my WJEC Criminology controlled assessment in which i received 99/100 marks; includes notes, model answers, case studies and answer checklists :) *Unit 3.2 not included* I will upload for free once i recover the file!

Preview 1 out of 6  pages

  • January 5, 2021
  • 6
  • 2019/2020
  • Other
  • Unknown

37  reviews

review-writer-avatar

By: aliamaan • 1 month ago

review-writer-avatar

By: allisongeorge12345 • 6 months ago

review-writer-avatar

By: dariamurlak • 7 months ago

review-writer-avatar

By: jacobjefferies • 9 months ago

review-writer-avatar

By: beccabuck06 • 10 months ago

review-writer-avatar

By: graceselbyu • 1 year ago

review-writer-avatar

By: saniaiscool • 1 year ago

Show more reviews  
avatar-seller
AC2.5 Discuss the use of lay people in criminal cases


Juries
Jurors are ordinary members of the public, or lay people, without legal knowledge, who
decide the outcome of criminal cases. The eligibility for jury selection and qualification is
contained in the Jury Act 1974 and the Criminal Justice Act 2003. Jurors:
 Are randomly selected from the names on the electoral register
 Are between the ages of 18 and 75
 Have a residency requirement of five years or more in the UK, Channel Islands or the
Isle of Mann
 Have no recent criminal convictions
A jury's role is to listen to the evidence and then decide the guilt or innocence of the
defendant. They are advised on the law by the judge and can take notes and ask questions,
via the judge, if so desired. The decision they make cannot be questioned.

Jury duty is compulsory, but there is a possibility of it being deferred for good reasons such
as a holiday, medical appointment, etc. Lawyers, judges and other legal personnel are now
able to carry out jury service as a result of the Criminal Justice Act 2003.

Strengths
Juries are ordinary people who, as such, can bring their own 'justice' or fairness to a case
(sometimes called jury equity). Even if a judge explains the law and how it should be
applied, the jury can still reach a verdict contrary to the evidence.

Case study
R v Owen – Jury equity can be shown in the case of R v Owen where the defendant's son
was killed by a reckless driver who was given a 12-month prison sentence. The driver
knocked Owen's son off his bicycle with a 30-ton truck, which was not insured and was not
roadworthy. Also, the driver had never passed a driving test and was blind in one eye. Owen
felt the sentence was insufficient and decided to take his justice for the loss of his son. He
went on to shoot the driver in the back and arm with a sawn-off shotgun. Charged with
attempted murder, Owen was guilty as he had deliberately shot the man. However, the jury
understood why he had done this and decided to acquit him. Later, some members of the
jury congratulated him. This was the jury's verdict, and nothing could be done about it.

The jury system is popular with the public, who have confidence in the system as they are
aware it is ordinary members of the public playing such an important role in the criminal
justice system. This right to be tried by your peers is enshrined in our history and is seen as a
democratic right. Moves to withdraw it for minor offences of theft were met with great
resistance. It is the 'lamp which shows that freedom lives' (Lord Devlin).

There are 12 people on a jury, which means no one individual is responsible; it allows for
numerous opinions to be discussed and taken into account. In addition, jury deliberations
are held in secret, and members of the jury cannot be called upon to explain their verdict.
This allows them to reach a decision even if it is not popular with the public.

The jury is impartial as members cannot be connected to anyone in the case. They only sit
for two weeks, unless agreed that the case may take longer, so do not become case-
hardened.

The benefits of buying summaries with Stuvia:

Guaranteed quality through customer reviews

Guaranteed quality through customer reviews

Stuvia customers have reviewed more than 700,000 summaries. This how you know that you are buying the best documents.

Quick and easy check-out

Quick and easy check-out

You can quickly pay through EFT, credit card or Stuvia-credit for the summaries. There is no membership needed.

Focus on what matters

Focus on what matters

Your fellow students write the study notes themselves, which is why the documents are always reliable and up-to-date. This ensures you quickly get to the core!

Frequently asked questions

What do I get when I buy this document?

You get a PDF, available immediately after your purchase. The purchased document is accessible anytime, anywhere and indefinitely through your profile.

Satisfaction guarantee: how does it work?

Our satisfaction guarantee ensures that you always find a study document that suits you well. You fill out a form, and our customer service team takes care of the rest.

Who am I buying this summary from?

Stuvia is a marketplace, so you are not buying this document from us, but from seller fudgeflies. Stuvia facilitates payment to the seller.

Will I be stuck with a subscription?

No, you only buy this summary for R95,25. You're not tied to anything after your purchase.

Can Stuvia be trusted?

4.6 stars on Google & Trustpilot (+1000 reviews)

72799 documents were sold in the last 30 days

Founded in 2010, the go-to place to buy summaries for 14 years now

Start selling
R95,25  23x  sold
  • (37)
  Buy now