advancing understanding of executive function impairments and psychopathology bridging the gap between clinical
Escuela, estudio y materia
Universiteit van Amsterdam (UvA)
BSc Psychology
Memory, Language, and Emotion
Todos documentos para esta materia (5)
Vendedor
Seguir
casoosterveld
Comentarios recibidos
Vista previa del contenido
Snyder (2015) - Advancing Understanding of Executive Function
Impairments and Psychopathology: Bridging the Gap between
Clinical and Cognitive Approaches.
Summary of Previous Findings
Deficits on a wide variety of Executive Functioning (EF) tasks are
associated with many psychopathologies.
- OCD: largest deficit in the “updating” aspect of EF
- ADHD: larger deficit for motor response inhibition
Overall, the results show common impairments in EF that apply to many
diagnoses.
The one exception that appears barely or even unaffected in most
disorders, is simple Working Memory Maintenance;
- manipulation is thus more impaired than maintenance.
- It has also been shown that visuospatial and verbal WM
manipulation are equally impaired
From this, it can be concluded that WM deficits in these disorders are due
to impairment in the Central Executive aspect of WM. And again, it is
consistent with the view that there are broad impairments in EF
associated with psychopathology, rather than impairments in a few
individual specific aspects of EF.
It is now important to build on the foundations of previous research
to better understand the specific mechanisms and causal processes
contributing to EF deficits in psychopathology, in order to move toward
clinical applications.
Figure 1 – Unity/Diversity model of EF
It’s important to note that the two representations of the model are
complimentary, and they are both latent variable models. Representation
A does include inhibition, in B this is incorporated into the “common EF”.
In B, “unity” refers to the common EF being a part of all tasks, and
“diversity” refers to updating and shifting being part of their own
specific tasks.
Figure 2 – Task Impurity Problem
A score on an EF task is composed of:
A. Systematic variance related to the specific aspect of EF
(shifting, updating) targeted by that one task. (so, actually
measuring the intended aspect)
B. Systematic variance related to the common EF; this variance is
shared across multiple types of EF tasks due to common EF being
part of all the tasks. (so, you always partially measure common EF
in any task)
C. Systematic variance related to non-EF aspects of the task,
such as:
o Articulation speed
o Visual processing
o Etc.
D. Non-systematic variance: Error!
Los beneficios de comprar resúmenes en Stuvia estan en línea:
Garantiza la calidad de los comentarios
Compradores de Stuvia evaluaron más de 700.000 resúmenes. Así estas seguro que compras los mejores documentos!
Compra fácil y rápido
Puedes pagar rápidamente y en una vez con iDeal, tarjeta de crédito o con tu crédito de Stuvia. Sin tener que hacerte miembro.
Enfócate en lo más importante
Tus compañeros escriben los resúmenes. Por eso tienes la seguridad que tienes un resumen actual y confiable.
Así llegas a la conclusión rapidamente!
Preguntas frecuentes
What do I get when I buy this document?
You get a PDF, available immediately after your purchase. The purchased document is accessible anytime, anywhere and indefinitely through your profile.
100% de satisfacción garantizada: ¿Cómo funciona?
Nuestra garantía de satisfacción le asegura que siempre encontrará un documento de estudio a tu medida. Tu rellenas un formulario y nuestro equipo de atención al cliente se encarga del resto.
Who am I buying this summary from?
Stuvia is a marketplace, so you are not buying this document from us, but from seller casoosterveld. Stuvia facilitates payment to the seller.
Will I be stuck with a subscription?
No, you only buy this summary for 4,89 €. You're not tied to anything after your purchase.