100% de satisfacción garantizada Inmediatamente disponible después del pago Tanto en línea como en PDF No estas atado a nada
logo-home
Buscado previamente por ti
Buscado previamente por ti
logo
Criminology Unit 3 3.1 Model Answer 3,66 €
Añadir al carrito
Navegar rápidamente a
Vista previa
  2.  
  3. WJEC
  4.  
  5. Criminology
  6.  
  7. Crime Scene to Courtroom

Examen

Criminology Unit 3 3.1 Model Answer

8 reseñas
 48 veces vendidas
  • Grado
  • Crime Scene to Courtroom
  • Institución
  • WJEC

This is a document is a full mark model answer for Criminology Unit 3 (Crime scene to courtroom) 3.1. This can be used as inspiration for your brief for the controlled assessment, or taken into the controlled assessment for guidance. WARNING: you may be disqualified from the exam for plagiarism if ...

[Mostrar más]

Vista previa 1 fuera de 3  páginas

Información del documento

  • 2 de febrero de 2022
  • 3
  • 2021/2022
  • Examen
  • Preguntas y respuestas

Temas

  • criminology
  • brief
  • model answer
  • full marks
  • unit 3
  • crime scene to courtroom
  • 31

Escuela, estudio y materia

  • A/AS Level
  • WJEC
  • Criminology
  • Crime Scene to Courtroom
Todos documentos para esta materia (392)

8  reseñas

review-writer-avatar

Por: 17yjanes • 1 año hace

review-writer-avatar

Por: scarbuck4 • 1 año hace

review-writer-avatar

Por: raihanaltib3388 • 1 año hace

review-writer-avatar

Por: henokefre • 2 año hace

review-writer-avatar

Por: saniaiscool • 2 año hace

review-writer-avatar

Por: jakey16 • 2 año hace

review-writer-avatar

Por: elliefhutchinson • 2 año hace

Mostrar mas comentarios  

Vendedor

avatar-seller
ThatCriminologyShop

Comentarios recibidos

Vista previa del contenido

3.1 - Examine information for validity

Amanda Knox:
In the case of Amanda Knox, forensic evidence was used against her which led to
both her conviction and to be later acquitted for the murder of Meredith Kercher. The
police used DNA on the suspected murder weapon, a knife, to convict Knox.Evidence,
such as eyewitness testimonies, evidence from experts and forensic evidence are
presented by both the defense and prosecution to aid their argument. The CPS requires
evidence to be admissible, reliable and credible to be considered valid. The validity of
evidence as a source of information in the Amanda Knox case can be questioned due to
circumstance, as Knox lived with the victim, so her DNA would be found at the crime
scene, and should not have been used as evidence for guilt. Therefore, it can be
suggested the evidence is circumstantial, as DNA in her own apartment is guaranteed to
be found. Furthermore, other forensic DNA was found on the victim’s bra clasp six weeks
after the murder. The defence argued it was too long after the crime for that to be used
as a reliable piece of evidence, and this means the currency of evidence can deem it to be
invalid. If the evidence is not collected within the golden hour, there is always a risk of
contamination, making the forensic evidence to lack currency. Lastly, a false eyewitness
testimony was presented by Knox, to say she had returned to her apartment the night of
the murder to find Lumumba stabbing Kercher. This form of evidence can be considered
to be invalid in this case due to bias, as Knox had lied to the court to try and frame
Lumumba to make her seem innocent. Furthermore, Knox’s reputation to lie to try and
get out of trouble reinforces the bias in any future testimonies she made. In contrast,
forensic evidence was used in the case of Ted Bundy, and it can be considered valid. A
forensic odontologist analysed the teeth marks on the sorority victim and compared it to
a mould of Bundy’s teeth. This form of evidence has currency, as it was up to date and the
mould was taken at the time of the trial. Similarly, the evidence can be argued to be
accurate as it was collected by a specialist in the field of forensic odontology. Therefore,
although forensic evidence, expert witness and eyewitness testimonies are viewed as
accurate forms of evidence, they may be invalid due to circumstance, currency and bias.

Christopher Jefferies:
In december 2010, Joanna Yeates disappeared and was found on Christmas day.
Christopher Jefferies (her landlord) was suspected, and there were multiple media
headlines about him, regarding him as the ‘the strange Mr Jefferies’. Despite later being
proved innocent, Jefferies was insulted and scapegoated by the media. Jefferies was
stereotyped due to his “creepy” appearance, and the media wrongly called him a
“peeping Tom”. The media report on criminal cases, and can have an influence on a
variety of things, such as the jurors involved in the case, or even lead to a moral panic
and a change in legislation. The media is known to stereotype and have a political bias.
Despite later being proved innocent, Jefferies was insulted and scapegoated by the
media. Jefferies was stereotyped due to his “creepy” appearance, and the media wrongly
called him a “peeping Tom”. Mr Jefferies told the Leveson Inquiry there had been a

Los beneficios de comprar resúmenes en Stuvia estan en línea:

Garantiza la calidad de los comentarios

Garantiza la calidad de los comentarios

Compradores de Stuvia evaluaron más de 700.000 resúmenes. Así estas seguro que compras los mejores documentos!

Compra fácil y rápido

Compra fácil y rápido

Puedes pagar rápidamente y en una vez con iDeal, tarjeta de crédito o con tu crédito de Stuvia. Sin tener que hacerte miembro.

Enfócate en lo más importante

Enfócate en lo más importante

Tus compañeros escriben los resúmenes. Por eso tienes la seguridad que tienes un resumen actual y confiable. Así llegas a la conclusión rapidamente!

Preguntas frecuentes

What do I get when I buy this document?

You get a PDF, available immediately after your purchase. The purchased document is accessible anytime, anywhere and indefinitely through your profile.

100% de satisfacción garantizada: ¿Cómo funciona?

Nuestra garantía de satisfacción le asegura que siempre encontrará un documento de estudio a tu medida. Tu rellenas un formulario y nuestro equipo de atención al cliente se encarga del resto.

Who am I buying this summary from?

Stuvia is a marketplace, so you are not buying this document from us, but from seller ThatCriminologyShop. Stuvia facilitates payment to the seller.

Will I be stuck with a subscription?

No, you only buy this summary for 3,66 €. You're not tied to anything after your purchase.

Can Stuvia be trusted?

4.6 stars on Google & Trustpilot (+1000 reviews)

45,681 summaries were sold in the last 30 days

Founded in 2010, the go-to place to buy summaries for 15 years now

Empieza a vender

Vistos recientemente

Examen ·

(11)

Criminology Unit 3 3.2 Model Answer

Lote ·

(0)

ALL ASVAB PACKAGED EXAMS LATEST VERSION

Examen ·

(0)

Python Exam 1 Questions and Answers

Examen ·

(0)

Python Exam 2 Questions and Answers

Examen ·

(0)

python exam 2 questions and answers

Reseña del libro ·

(0)

boek verslag red ons maria montanelli

Lote ·

(0)

AL ATI TEAS LATEST EXAMS 2023-2024

Resumen ·

(0)

A level Organic Chemistry Mechanisms

3,66 €  48x  vendido
  • (8)
Añadir al carrito
Añadido