Resumen
Summary of case studies for Introduction to International Organisations (2022)
- Grado
- Institución
Summary of case studies for Introduction to International Organisations (2022)
[Mostrar más]Vista previa 1 fuera de 5 páginas
Vista previa 1 fuera de 5 páginas
Añadir al carrito
Añadir al carrito
Vendedor
Seguir
teaksgardens-0r
Comentarios recibidos
Vista previa del contenido
Semester 1, Block 1 – 2022Case studies in Introduction to International Organisations
ICJ: Iran - US (lecture)
▪ The US accused Iran of having nuclear weapons -> enforced sanctions on Iran
▪ Iran brought the case to ICJ, as sanctions were against the 1955 Treaty of Amity
▪ ICJ unanimously decided the US must lift sanctions related to humanitarian needs
▪ Order of provisional measures, as this is an ongoing case
ICJ: Australia - Japan Whaling
▪ Japan and Australia are part of ICRW which introduced quotas on whaling
▪ Japan kept on whaling for 'scientific purposes
▪ Australia found out and brought this to the ICJ because ICRW included ICJ in its treaty
▪ Japan lost, and the requirements for 'scientific purposes' got stricter
▪ Japan withdrew from the International Whaling Commission so that it could continue to whale
▪ Ironic end: Japan whaling industry demand is declining
ICJ: Yerodia Congo - Belgium
▪ Belgium created a domestic law that has universal applicability (according to Belgium)
▪ Using that law, Belgium prosecuted Congo's President Yerodia
▪ Congo brought the case to ICJ, arguing Belgium had violated its sovereignty
▪ ICJ used customary law, and Belgium lost
ICJ: Canada optional clause
▪ Canada wanted to decrease fishing in the international water close to its EEZ
▪ Canada amended its domestic law, omitting the optional clause of the ICJ
▪ When Spain fishermen came close to Canada's EEZ, Canada deployed its warships and air force
on Spanish boats
▪ Spain complained to the ICJ, but they could not bring Canada to ICJ because of the amendment
earlier
ICJ: Certain expenses
▪ Demand for legal advice by GA on a dispute relating to the Uniting for peace resolution
▪ The GA formed a peacekeeping mission in Congo
▪ The Soviet Union and France refused to pay their contributions to the regular UN budget based
on the argument that the GA was not allowed to finance the Congo mission
▪ ICJ decision: GA financing of the Congo mission was legal (financing through the UN budget)
▪ Political consequence: separate budget for peacekeeping operations because of the advisory
opinion
Los beneficios de comprar resúmenes en Stuvia estan en línea:
Garantiza la calidad de los comentarios
Compradores de Stuvia evaluaron más de 700.000 resúmenes. Así estas seguro que compras los mejores documentos!
Compra fácil y rápido
Puedes pagar rápidamente y en una vez con iDeal, tarjeta de crédito o con tu crédito de Stuvia. Sin tener que hacerte miembro.
Enfócate en lo más importante
Tus compañeros escriben los resúmenes. Por eso tienes la seguridad que tienes un resumen actual y confiable. Así llegas a la conclusión rapidamente!
Preguntas frecuentes
What do I get when I buy this document?
You get a PDF, available immediately after your purchase. The purchased document is accessible anytime, anywhere and indefinitely through your profile.
100% de satisfacción garantizada: ¿Cómo funciona?
Nuestra garantía de satisfacción le asegura que siempre encontrará un documento de estudio a tu medida. Tu rellenas un formulario y nuestro equipo de atención al cliente se encarga del resto.
Who am I buying this summary from?
Stuvia is a marketplace, so you are not buying this document from us, but from seller teaksgardens-0r. Stuvia facilitates payment to the seller.
Will I be stuck with a subscription?
No, you only buy this summary for 2,99 €. You're not tied to anything after your purchase.
Can Stuvia be trusted?
4.6 stars on Google & Trustpilot (+1000 reviews)
45,681 summaries were sold in the last 30 days
Founded in 2010, the go-to place to buy summaries for 14 years now