Examen
Exam (elaborations) LRM3701 (LRM3701)
- Grado
- Institución
Exam (elaborations) LRM3701 (LRM3701)
[Mostrar más]Vista previa 2 fuera de 10 páginas
Vista previa 2 fuera de 10 páginas
Añadir al carrito
Añadir al carrito
Vendedor
Seguir
TheEconomist
Comentarios recibidos
Vista previa del contenido
+27 680 77 9615info@furtherstudiesinstitute.com
280 Oak Avenue, Randburg, Johannesburg, ZA
, +27 680 77 9615
info@furtherstudiesinstitute.com
280 Oak Avenue, Randburg, Johannesburg, ZA
QUESTION 1
Click on the link, read the content and then answer the following questions:
1.1. Make use of the facts in this case study, determine whether or not the
dismissals in question werefair from a substantive point of view. [6
marks]
As per the given facts in the case study, the National Education, Health and
Allied Workers' Union (Nehawu) has condemned the dismissal of its shop
stewards at the University of South Africa (Unisa) as unfair. The union
claimed that the university did not follow the correct procedures in terminating
the employment contracts of the shop stewards who were fired with
immediate effect following their precautionary suspension for violating the
Unisa ethics code and employee disciplinary code.
However, from a substantive point of view, it appears that the dismissals were
fair. The shop stewards were suspended for violating the ethics code and
employee disciplinary code, and the university claimed that they incited public
violence and caused malicious damage to property during an awards
ceremony. These are serious allegations that would justify disciplinary action
against employees. The university also claimed that the shop stewards
disrupted the ceremony, which would have had a negative impact on the
institution's reputation.
In terms of the LRA, an employer must have a fair reason for dismissing an
employee, and the reason must be related to the employee's conduct,
capacity or compatibility with the employer's operational requirements.1 In this
case, the university had a fair reason for dismissing the shop stewards based
on their alleged misconduct. Moreover, the employer must follow a fair
1
See Section 186 of the Labour Relations Act 66 of 1995.
Los beneficios de comprar resúmenes en Stuvia estan en línea:
Garantiza la calidad de los comentarios
Compradores de Stuvia evaluaron más de 700.000 resúmenes. Así estas seguro que compras los mejores documentos!
Compra fácil y rápido
Puedes pagar rápidamente y en una vez con iDeal, tarjeta de crédito o con tu crédito de Stuvia. Sin tener que hacerte miembro.
Enfócate en lo más importante
Tus compañeros escriben los resúmenes. Por eso tienes la seguridad que tienes un resumen actual y confiable. Así llegas a la conclusión rapidamente!
Preguntas frecuentes
What do I get when I buy this document?
You get a PDF, available immediately after your purchase. The purchased document is accessible anytime, anywhere and indefinitely through your profile.
100% de satisfacción garantizada: ¿Cómo funciona?
Nuestra garantía de satisfacción le asegura que siempre encontrará un documento de estudio a tu medida. Tu rellenas un formulario y nuestro equipo de atención al cliente se encarga del resto.
Who am I buying this summary from?
Stuvia is a marketplace, so you are not buying this document from us, but from seller TheEconomist. Stuvia facilitates payment to the seller.
Will I be stuck with a subscription?
No, you only buy this summary for 5,40 €. You're not tied to anything after your purchase.
Can Stuvia be trusted?
4.6 stars on Google & Trustpilot (+1000 reviews)
45,681 summaries were sold in the last 30 days
Founded in 2010, the go-to place to buy summaries for 14 years now