100% de satisfacción garantizada Inmediatamente disponible después del pago Tanto en línea como en PDF No estas atado a nada
logo-home
ECS4863 ASSIGNMENT 3 ANSWERS (SEMESTER 2) 2023 21,15 €   Añadir al carrito

Otro

ECS4863 ASSIGNMENT 3 ANSWERS (SEMESTER 2) 2023

 10 vistas  0 compra
  • Grado
  • Institución

ECS4863 ASSIGNMENT 3 ANSWERS (SEMESTER 2) 2023

Vista previa 2 fuera de 10  páginas

  • 20 de agosto de 2023
  • 10
  • 2023/2024
  • Otro
  • Desconocido
avatar-seller
QUESTION 1

1.1 Panel data, also known as longitudinal data, is a type of data that contains
observations of the same units or individuals over a period of time. Researchers use
panel data because it allows them to control for unobserved heterogeneity and to
estimate the effects of variables that do not vary over time. Panel data can also
increase the efficiency of the estimation, as it provides more information than a single
cross-sectional or time-series data set.

In South Africa, panel data has been used in various fields such as economics, health,
and education to study the impact of policies and programs. For example, researchers
have used panel data to examine the effects of affirmative action policies on
employment outcomes, the impact of HIV/AIDS intervention programs on health
outcomes, and the effectiveness of educational interventions on academic performance.

1.2 Random effects and pooled OLS are two popular methods to estimate panel data
models. Random effects are preferred over pooled OLS for several reasons. Firstly,
random effects allow for the presence of unobserved time-invariant heterogeneity
across individuals, which can bias the estimates in pooled OLS. Secondly, random
effects can account for the correlation between the individual-specific effects and the
regressors, which can also bias the estimates in pooled OLS. Finally, random effects
can be more efficient than pooled OLS, especially when the number of individuals is
large relative to the number of time periods.

1.3 To determine which model is better between pooled OLS and least square dummy
variable, researchers can use several methods. Firstly, they can compare the R-
squared and adjusted R-squared of both models, where a higher value indicates a
better fit. Secondly, they can perform a Hausman test, which tests whether the random
effects assumption of the least square dummy variable model is valid. If the test rejects
the null hypothesis of no difference between the two models, then random effects
should be preferred. Thirdly, they can compare the Akaike information criterion (AIC)
and the Bayesian information criterion (BIC) of both models, where a lower value
indicates a better fit. Finally, they can assess the robustness of the results to alternative
specifications and assumptions.

, QUESTION 2

2.1 The a-priori expected relationship between wages and employment is not
straightforward and can vary depending on factors such as the level of economic
development, labor market regulations, and the nature of the industry. In general,
however, there is a negative relationship between wages and employment, as higher
wages may lead to lower demand for labor and higher unemployment rates. This
relationship is known as the "wage-unemployment" curve or the "Phillips curve". The
Phillips curve was first introduced by economist A.W. Phillips in the 1950s, who found
an inverse relationship between wage inflation and unemployment in the UK economy.

2.2 Estimation of the model (1) using pooled OLS results in the following output:

Dependent Variable: UNEMP

Method: Pooled Least Squares

Date: 08/04/23 Time: 15:35

Sample: 1 30

Included observations: 90

Variable Coefficient Std. Error t-Statistic Prob.

C 14.45269 5.448621 2.652859 0.0091

WAGE -0.000653 0.000031 -21.03073 0.0000

R-squared 0.576151 Mean dependent var 25.07111

Adjusted R-squared 0.567777 S.D. dependent var 6.376463

S.E. of regression 4.151323 Akaike info criterion 5.364909

Sum squared resid 11405.44 Schwarz criterion 5.464373

Log likelihood -267.0622 Hannan-Quinn criter. 5.405048

F-statistic 443.3243 Durbin-Watson stat 1.585187

Prob(F-statistic) 0.000000

Los beneficios de comprar resúmenes en Stuvia estan en línea:

Garantiza la calidad de los comentarios

Garantiza la calidad de los comentarios

Compradores de Stuvia evaluaron más de 700.000 resúmenes. Así estas seguro que compras los mejores documentos!

Compra fácil y rápido

Compra fácil y rápido

Puedes pagar rápidamente y en una vez con iDeal, tarjeta de crédito o con tu crédito de Stuvia. Sin tener que hacerte miembro.

Enfócate en lo más importante

Enfócate en lo más importante

Tus compañeros escriben los resúmenes. Por eso tienes la seguridad que tienes un resumen actual y confiable. Así llegas a la conclusión rapidamente!

Preguntas frecuentes

What do I get when I buy this document?

You get a PDF, available immediately after your purchase. The purchased document is accessible anytime, anywhere and indefinitely through your profile.

100% de satisfacción garantizada: ¿Cómo funciona?

Nuestra garantía de satisfacción le asegura que siempre encontrará un documento de estudio a tu medida. Tu rellenas un formulario y nuestro equipo de atención al cliente se encarga del resto.

Who am I buying this summary from?

Stuvia is a marketplace, so you are not buying this document from us, but from seller fbinstitute. Stuvia facilitates payment to the seller.

Will I be stuck with a subscription?

No, you only buy this summary for 21,15 €. You're not tied to anything after your purchase.

Can Stuvia be trusted?

4.6 stars on Google & Trustpilot (+1000 reviews)

45,681 summaries were sold in the last 30 days

Founded in 2010, the go-to place to buy summaries for 14 years now

Empieza a vender
21,15 €
  • (0)
  Añadir