100% de satisfacción garantizada Inmediatamente disponible después del pago Tanto en línea como en PDF No estas atado a nada
logo-home
Ultimate Preparation Guide for IEB English Paper 2 8,99 €   Añadir al carrito

Examen

Ultimate Preparation Guide for IEB English Paper 2

1 revisar
 75 vistas  2 veces vendidas
  • Grado
  • Institución

This Guide covers and carefully explains every skill needed to achieve the best possible mark for IEB English Paper I. The Guide is divided by question (The Tempest, The Handmaid's Tale, The Theory of Flight, Transactional Writing) with explanations, examples, practice questions, past paper revis...

[Mostrar más]

Vista previa 4 fuera de 43  páginas

  • 30 de agosto de 2023
  • 43
  • 2023/2024
  • Examen
  • Preguntas y respuestas
  • 200

1  revisar

review-writer-avatar

Por: dakotablu • 2 meses hace

avatar-seller
NAME




English Home Language

Matric Assessment Preparation File
(2023)

Paper 2
A. The literary essay
1. The Tempest
2. The Handmaid’s Tale
3. The Theory of Flight


B.Transactional Writing




XANTHIPI THEOPHANOUS 1

,Section A: The Literary Essay
Both essay questions count 30 marks, and you should spend approximately 1 hour completing each one.
These questions focus on the ability to state and defend a position.

What you need to know (taken and adapted from the IEB Subject Assessment
Guidelines 2023):

GUIDELINES LITERARY ESSAY
The literature essay assesses your ability to understand, interpret, and form an opinion on themes,
characters, symbolism, etc. Essay topics will be open-ended enough to allow for personal interpretations
within the limits of the author’s accepted intentions.
Here are some suggestions from the IEB’s Subject Assessment Guidelines:

 Length: The length of your essays should be between 2½ and 3½ pages (in average handwriting) –
or approximately 600—700 words. This should be seen as a guideline only. There is NO penalty for
length other than the development of the argument in the essay itself. A word count at the end of the
essay is NOT required. (This is a guideline only. Do not waste time counting words and writing down
a word count. Markers assess the essay on its substance not its length. If your essay is too short it
will naturally lack substance and if your essay is too long it will naturally become repetitive and veer
off-topic.)

 Structure, logic, and organisation of ideas will be assessed as part of the holistic, final assessment
out of 30 marks. The way in which you argue is as important as what you are arguing.
o Your introduction should introduce your argument, provide your essay with clear focus and
direction – and demonstrate an understanding of the topic.
o The conclusion should ‘tie up’ the argument conclusively.
o Each paragraph should develop the argument and must not simply be a series of unconnected
statements. Examiners want to see evidence of a stance being taken.
o There should be no sub-headings.
o Use transitional statements between paragraphs, for example: in addition, also, consequently,
on the other hand, to sum up, in fact, what is more, etc.
 The structure of your essay is as important as its content. Therefore:
o Short, pertinent quotations or textual references from the prescribed texts should be used
to enrich and substantiate your argument. Quotations should be integrated into sentences.
o In order to avoid becoming side-tracked from the focus of the essay topic, you are encouraged
to refer regularly to the essence of the given topic, almost reminding yourself and your
reader that you are focused on the literary exploration which the question requires.
o Incidents or actions from the texts should be analysed (not merely mentioned or retold)
to add substance to your argument.
 Language:
o The register of the response should be formal; avoid colloquialisms, abbreviations, and
contractions. Avoid figurative or emotive language (unless you are quoting, obviously).
o Underline the titles of literary texts.
o The present tense should be used throughout the essay. In line with much current academic
discourse, it is perfectly acceptable to use the first person or the third person when writing a
formal essay.




XANTHIPI THEOPHANOUS 2

, INTRODUCTION:
analyse key words
- link to text &
take a stance -
thesis statement




CONCLUSION: PARAGRAPH:
summarise main first point to
points brought up prove thesis
in introduction & statement/link to
addressed in each a key aspect of
paragraph; topic - topic
provide an answer sentence +
to the thesis example +
statement. analysis




PARAGRAPH: PARAGRAPH:
third point to second point to
prove thesis prove thesis
statement/link to Transition statement/link to
a key aspect of Phrase a key aspect of
topic - topic topic - topic
sentence + sentence +
example + example +
analysis analysis




http://www.wolfgroupweb.com/en/essay-structure


What assessors look for when marking the essay:
 Your ability to unpack and engage with the topic in a manner that shows your understanding of both
the topic and the text.
 A thorough, accurate and confident knowledge of the text, as well as an insightful understanding of
the text (how character and theme contribute to meaning).
 Your ability to take a stance and present a clear argument that is developed logically throughout your
essay. This argument should be focused and not deviate from the topic.
 Your ability to select the relevant information to substantiate your carefully crafted argument. This
information should be integrated into and elaborated on in your essay.
 An impressive command of spelling, language and punctuation.

Reminder:
 This section does NOT test your knowledge of the text – this is implied. In other words, if you rattle
off the whole story with quotes you will not get a good mark.
 This section DOES test your ability to comprehend a topic, engage with the topic, and use your
knowledge and comprehension of the play to construct an argument around the topic.




XANTHIPI THEOPHANOUS 3

, Abbreviated rubric:
EXCEPTIONAL: Highly eloquent; academic rigour; strong individual voice; confident knowledge of text.
7++

Exceptional ability to develop an academically superior argument; ophisticated tackling of topic; fluid and
100% elevated style.
 Quotations are integrated with exceptional ability – quotations & substantiation build a logically flawless argument
30 that exceeds expectations.
 Error-free.
ELEVATED: Impressive and distinguished; succinct; selects information to build an argument with
7+ sophistication; depth of knowledge; dips into text with confidence; consistent question focus.

90-% 
Analytical concepts developed with precision – tightly constructed argument.

All aspects of the topic have been addressed with confidence and distinction. Maintains consistent focus without
29 deviating from central concerns of the question.
 Thorough, impressive, in-depth knowledge of the text, perhaps even drawing on moments of the text that
28 distinguish the candidate’s superior, refined knowledge and understanding. Impressive integration & elaboration
on specific textual references/ evidence.
27  Impressive/ exceptional evidence of original voice.
 Constructs exceptionally critical, relevant and consistent connections between topic and argument, displaying
a convincing, impressive line of logical progression.
 Exceptionally lucid and logical. Excellent transitions between paragraphs which enhance argument
development. Essay signposted throughout, indicating a commendable degree of confidence in engaging with
the question.
 Impressive command of register, spelling, diction, language and punctuation.
EXCELLENT: Sophisticated and perceptive; commendable and well structured; substantiation from text
enhances argument (which requires minor polish for a level 7+)
7
 Thoroughly developed argument – all aspects of the topic have been addressed with sophistication. Maintains
80-% consistent focus without deviating from central concerns of the question.
 Thorough, accurate & confident knowledge & insightful understanding of the text. Commendable integration
26 and elaboration on specific textual references/ evidence – although at times these could have been used with greater
effect.
25  Excellent ability to select information to develop a succinct, clearly focused and perceptive argument.
 Commendable evidence of original voice.
24  Constructs critical, relevant and consistent connections between topic and argument, displaying a convincing,
sophisticated line of logical progression.
 Lucid and focused although there may be a sense that further logical development could have enhanced this
essay further.
 Commendable development of literary structure: focused introduction and conclusion. Excellent transitions
between paragraphs. Essay signposted throughout, indicating a commendable degree of confidence in engaging
with the question.
 Impressive command of register, spelling, diction, language and punctuation, although there may be minor stylistic
flaws.
COMPETENT: Above average; proficient and skilful; logical, focused and accurate argument; dips into the text
6 skilfully; minor lapses

70-%  Competently developed argument which may have minor lapses.
 All aspects of the topic have been addressed with conviction – OR: part of the topic has been addressed with
23 depth and sophistication.
 Competent, accurate knowledge and proficient understanding of text – there may be minor gaps that do not
22 impact the strength of the argument.
 Skilful and proficient selection and elaboration on information to develop a mostly focused and competent
21 argument.
 Skilful evidence of original voice.
 Relevant and consistent connections between topic and argument, displaying a convincing, proficient line of
logical progression.
 Lucid and focused – although there may be a sense that further logical development could have enhanced this
essay further.
 Competent development of literary essay structure: focused introduction and conclusion; skilful transitions
between paragraphs. Essay signposted throughout, indicating a commendably confident engagement with question.
 Competent command of spelling, language and punctuation, although there may be minor stylistic flaws.
 (*An essay in this category may be one where the candidate displays an ability to develop an argument that is highly
commendable and distinguished – which would result in a level 7 or 7+ - but is hindered by major stylistic flaws.)




XANTHIPI THEOPHANOUS 4

Los beneficios de comprar resúmenes en Stuvia estan en línea:

Garantiza la calidad de los comentarios

Garantiza la calidad de los comentarios

Compradores de Stuvia evaluaron más de 700.000 resúmenes. Así estas seguro que compras los mejores documentos!

Compra fácil y rápido

Compra fácil y rápido

Puedes pagar rápidamente y en una vez con iDeal, tarjeta de crédito o con tu crédito de Stuvia. Sin tener que hacerte miembro.

Enfócate en lo más importante

Enfócate en lo más importante

Tus compañeros escriben los resúmenes. Por eso tienes la seguridad que tienes un resumen actual y confiable. Así llegas a la conclusión rapidamente!

Preguntas frecuentes

What do I get when I buy this document?

You get a PDF, available immediately after your purchase. The purchased document is accessible anytime, anywhere and indefinitely through your profile.

100% de satisfacción garantizada: ¿Cómo funciona?

Nuestra garantía de satisfacción le asegura que siempre encontrará un documento de estudio a tu medida. Tu rellenas un formulario y nuestro equipo de atención al cliente se encarga del resto.

Who am I buying this summary from?

Stuvia is a marketplace, so you are not buying this document from us, but from seller xantheophanous. Stuvia facilitates payment to the seller.

Will I be stuck with a subscription?

No, you only buy this summary for 8,99 €. You're not tied to anything after your purchase.

Can Stuvia be trusted?

4.6 stars on Google & Trustpilot (+1000 reviews)

45,681 summaries were sold in the last 30 days

Founded in 2010, the go-to place to buy summaries for 14 years now

Empieza a vender
8,99 €  2x  vendido
  • (1)
  Añadir