100% de satisfacción garantizada Inmediatamente disponible después del pago Tanto en línea como en PDF No estas atado a nada
logo-home
Summary JURISPUDENCE: Notes on Hart and Fuller 3,17 €   Añadir al carrito

Resumen

Summary JURISPUDENCE: Notes on Hart and Fuller

 67 vistas  2 purchases
  • Grado
  • Institución

provides a summary of the readings for Hart's ‘Positivism and the Separation of Law and Morals’ and Fuller's ‘Positivism and Fidelity to Law—A Reply to Professor Hart’ from the pages prescribed by Dr. Boonzaier. it contains - Notes from every page from both readings in simplified langu...

[Mostrar más]

Vista previa 1 fuera de 10  páginas

  • 21 de septiembre de 2023
  • 10
  • 2023/2024
  • Resumen
avatar-seller
1




Jurisprudence
Leo’s Readings Week 2



Content

- Notes from every page from both readings in
simplified language
- Background on Fuller and Hart
- Summary of their arguments
- Additional analysis




‘Positivism and the Separation of Law and Morals’
Hart

(Prescribed: page 606-615)

- A law says that you can't drive a car into a public park. Obviously, this doesn't allow
cars, but what about bikes, roller skates, and toy cars? But what about planes? Are
these things "vehicles" for the rule's purposes or not?
- There must be a core of clear meaning, but there will also be a penumbra of grey areas
where words are neither obviously right nor obviously wrong.

- If we want to say whether or not new facts fit into the existing rules, the classifier must
make a decision on his own
- Situations don't come to us neatly labelled, folded, and creased, and their legal
classification isn't written on them so the judge can just read it off.
- Instead, when applying legal rules, someone has to decide if the words in question cover
the case at hand or not taking into account all of the practical effects of this choice.
- We can call problems that don't fit neatly into standard cases or meanings "problems of
the penumbra."

- If there must be a penumbra of uncertainty around all legal rules, then it can't be a
matter of logical deduction to apply them to specific cases in the penumbra area.
- This means that deductive reasoning can't be used as a model for what judges should
do to bring specific cases under general rules.

Los beneficios de comprar resúmenes en Stuvia estan en línea:

Garantiza la calidad de los comentarios

Garantiza la calidad de los comentarios

Compradores de Stuvia evaluaron más de 700.000 resúmenes. Así estas seguro que compras los mejores documentos!

Compra fácil y rápido

Compra fácil y rápido

Puedes pagar rápidamente y en una vez con iDeal, tarjeta de crédito o con tu crédito de Stuvia. Sin tener que hacerte miembro.

Enfócate en lo más importante

Enfócate en lo más importante

Tus compañeros escriben los resúmenes. Por eso tienes la seguridad que tienes un resumen actual y confiable. Así llegas a la conclusión rapidamente!

Preguntas frecuentes

What do I get when I buy this document?

You get a PDF, available immediately after your purchase. The purchased document is accessible anytime, anywhere and indefinitely through your profile.

100% de satisfacción garantizada: ¿Cómo funciona?

Nuestra garantía de satisfacción le asegura que siempre encontrará un documento de estudio a tu medida. Tu rellenas un formulario y nuestro equipo de atención al cliente se encarga del resto.

Who am I buying this summary from?

Stuvia is a marketplace, so you are not buying this document from us, but from seller LawGuru. Stuvia facilitates payment to the seller.

Will I be stuck with a subscription?

No, you only buy this summary for 3,17 €. You're not tied to anything after your purchase.

Can Stuvia be trusted?

4.6 stars on Google & Trustpilot (+1000 reviews)

45,681 summaries were sold in the last 30 days

Founded in 2010, the go-to place to buy summaries for 14 years now

Empieza a vender
3,17 €  2x  vendido
  • (0)
  Añadir