Examen
IRM1501 MAY JUNE 2024 PORTFOLIO (COMPLETE ANSWERS) Semester 1 2024 - DUE 27 May 2024
- Grado
- Institución
- Book
IRM1501 MAY JUNE 2024 PORTFOLIO (COMPLETE ANSWERS) Semester 1 2024 - DUE 27 May 2024
[Mostrar más]Vista previa 1 fuera de 9 páginas
Vista previa 1 fuera de 9 páginas
Añadir al carrito
Añadir al carrito
Libro relacionado
Título del libro:
Autor(es):
- Edición:
- ISBN:
- Edición:
Más resúmenes para
-
Exam (elaborations) IRM1501 MAY JUNE 2024 PORTFOLIO (COMPLETE ANSWERS) Semester 1 2024 - DUE 27 May 2024 • Course • Introduction to Research Methodology for Law (IRM1501) • Institution • Unive...
-
Exam (elaborations) IRM1501 MAY JUNE 2024 PORTFOLIO (COMPLETE ANSWERS) Semester 1 2024 - DUE 27 May 2024 • Course • Introduction to Research Methodology for Law (IRM1501) • Institution • Unive...
-
Exam (elaborations) IRM1501 MAY JUNE 2024 PORTFOLIO (COMPLETE ANSWERS) Semester 1 2024 - DUE 27 May 2024 • Course • Introduction to Research Methodology for Law (IRM1501) • Institution • Unive...
Vendedor
Seguir
bsenedict
Comentarios recibidos
Vista previa del contenido
IRM1501 MAY JUNE 2024PORTFOLIO (COMPLETE ANSWERS)
Semester 1 2024 – DUE 27 May 2024
100% TRUSTED workings, explanations and solutions.
QUESTION 1
The Constitutional Court of South Africa in the case of Sidumo v Rustenburg
Platinum Mines Ltd & Others 2007 12 BLLR 1097 (CC) devised a new test to be
applied when determining the fairness of the dismissal. Discuss the case of
Sidumo in the prescribed format (facts, legal question, reasons for the decision or
ratio decidendi and the findings of the case) and highlight the test that the
Constitutional Court designed in deciding on fairness in labour law matters. (15
Marks)
Sidumo v Rustenburg Platinum Mines Ltd & Others 2007 12 BLLR 1097 (CC)
Facts:
Sidumo was a security guard employed by Rustenburg Platinum Mines. His duties
included searching employees to prevent theft. During a search, Sidumo failed to follow
proper procedures, which resulted in the loss of a significant amount of platinum.
Consequently, he was dismissed for negligence. Sidumo challenged the fairness of his
dismissal, and the matter was eventually taken to the Constitutional Court of South Africa.
Legal Question:
The key legal question was whether the dismissal of Sidumo for negligence was fair, and
more broadly, what the appropriate test for fairness in dismissals should be according to
South African labour law.
Los beneficios de comprar resúmenes en Stuvia estan en línea:
Garantiza la calidad de los comentarios
Compradores de Stuvia evaluaron más de 700.000 resúmenes. Así estas seguro que compras los mejores documentos!
Compra fácil y rápido
Puedes pagar rápidamente y en una vez con iDeal, tarjeta de crédito o con tu crédito de Stuvia. Sin tener que hacerte miembro.
Enfócate en lo más importante
Tus compañeros escriben los resúmenes. Por eso tienes la seguridad que tienes un resumen actual y confiable. Así llegas a la conclusión rapidamente!
Preguntas frecuentes
What do I get when I buy this document?
You get a PDF, available immediately after your purchase. The purchased document is accessible anytime, anywhere and indefinitely through your profile.
100% de satisfacción garantizada: ¿Cómo funciona?
Nuestra garantía de satisfacción le asegura que siempre encontrará un documento de estudio a tu medida. Tu rellenas un formulario y nuestro equipo de atención al cliente se encarga del resto.
Who am I buying this summary from?
Stuvia is a marketplace, so you are not buying this document from us, but from seller bsenedict. Stuvia facilitates payment to the seller.
Will I be stuck with a subscription?
No, you only buy this summary for 4,28 €. You're not tied to anything after your purchase.
Can Stuvia be trusted?
4.6 stars on Google & Trustpilot (+1000 reviews)
45,681 summaries were sold in the last 30 days
Founded in 2010, the go-to place to buy summaries for 14 years now