Escrito por estudiantes que aprobaron Inmediatamente disponible después del pago Leer en línea o como PDF ¿Documento equivocado? Cámbialo gratis 4,6 TrustPilot
logo-home
Examen

COM4806-Organisational Communication Research ASSIGNMENT 1 2022.

Puntuación
-
Vendido
3
Páginas
14
Grado
A+
Subido en
30-08-2022
Escrito en
2022/2023

COM4806-Organisational Communication Research ASSIGNMENT 1 2022. 1 INTRODUCTION Research is one of many different ways of knowing or understanding something. Research is conducted for a variety of reasons, including understanding, describing, predicting, or controlling an educational or psychological phenomenon, or to empower individuals in such contexts. As a result, this study is based on the philosophical foundations of communication research. The first section is divided into five parts, each with a different paradigmatic viewpoint. These are the pragmatic, postcolonial, indigenous, decolonial positivist, interpretivist, and transformative, in that order. The research examines the relationships between paradigmatic positions and epistemology, axiology, ontology, and methodology paradigms. In the second section, the study clarifies epistemology and discusses how each paradigmatic stance compares epistemology. It also 3 discusses the research process and epistemology. 2 QUESTION 1: DIFFERENT PARADIGMATIC POSITIONS Ndlovu-Gatsheni (2017:187) states that, the main issue is that research is still based on a Euro-North American worldview. Researching continues to empower the "researcher" with the ability to define. Instead of people, the "researched" appear as "specimens." For that reason, a research methodology is defined as the process of attempting to understand the "Other," who becomes the object rather than the subject of study, and what it means to be known by others. As a result, methodology must be decolonized. Its decolonization is an ethical, ontological, and political exercise rather than a matter of approach and methods of producing knowledge. According to Chilisa and Kawulich (2012:51), "this paradigmatic position carries hope and promotes transformation and social change among the historically oppressed by employing challenging deficit ways of thinking and 4 pathological descriptions of the former colonized to reconstruct a body of knowledge to focus on positive deviations in the context of postcolonial future success." Indigenous knowledge systems, critical theory, postcolonial discourses, feminist theories, critical race-specific theories, and neo-Marxist theories all inform this paradigmatic position. The positivist equates the empirical world of data (language) with the real world of mechanism. The assumption that such an independent reality exists leads to the belief that a universal truth also exists, a belief that critical realists have challenged. The search for empirical regularity that characterizes positivist philosophy is related to this. Because positivist philosophy adheres to realism or gullible realism, the empirical regularity observed are statistical treasures rather than a representation of the real world of mechanism. Oppong (2014:245) Guba and Lincoln (2005:114) proposed a set of criteria for assessing the credibility of interpretive research. Quality research is defined as having credibility, transferability, dependability, and confirmability. If researchers are honest and conscientious in their pursuit of truth, the results have resonance for people in other contexts, and the steps and methods of the study are described in detail, then the study meets the quality criteria proposed by Guba and Lincoln. Critical methodology is dialogic and dialectical Guba and Lincoln,( 2005), requiring the investigator to engage the subjects in dialogue with the goal of bringing about change in their outlook on social systems that keep them deprived of intellectual and social needs. To avoid exclusion of participants, researchers take a collaborative approach, involving subjects in the formulation of questions, data collection, and analysis. Critical educational researchers could help to transform social systems based on injustice and discrimination.

Mostrar más Leer menos
Institución
Grado

Vista previa del contenido

Organisational Communication Research
COM4806
ASSIGNMENT 1




STUDENT NAME: TIISETSO FAITH MOAGI


STUDENT NUMBER: 59750650


UNIQUENUMBER: 177794


MODULE CODE: COM4806


YEAR: 2022




1

, DECLARATION OF OWN WORK


I, TIISETSO FAITH MOAGI
Confirm that:
✓ This MODULE contains my own, original ideas and work
✓ those ideas, or work, that are not my own, have been cited using the prescribed referencing
system, with which I have familiarised myself, as described in Tutorial Letter CMNHON/E/301
✓ I have not submitted the ideas or work contained in this MODULE for any other tertiary
education credit
✓ I have read Unisa’s Policy of Research Ethics Policy on Research Ethics.pdf
✓I have familiarised myself with WRITING FOR ACADEMIC INTEGRITY at
https://sites.google.com/a/unisacommscience.co.za/writing-for-academicintegrity/home?pli=1
✓ I have read and understood the PLAGIARISM POWERPOINT FOR POSTGRADUATE
STUDIES (available under ADDITIONAL SOURCES on myUnisa)
✓ I have familiarised myself with the library guides offered by Unisa’s Library at
https://libguides.unisa.ac.za/research-support/plagiarism
✓ I have read and understood Unisa’s Policy for Copyright Infringement and Plagiarism AND I
am aware that plagiarism is punishable in terms of the Copyright Act 98 of 1978. I have also read
the regulations of the University of South Africa in this respect, which are available online at
https://www.unisa.ac.za/static/corporate_web/Content/Apply%20for%20admission/Do
cuments/Policy_copyright_infringement_plagiarism_16November2005.pdf

__59750650__
STUDENT NUMBER

__TIISETSO MOAGI__ _23 MAY 2022___
SIGNATURE DATE

_EMMANUEL MOAGI__ _23 MAY 2022___
WITNESS DATE

Table of Contents
1 INTRODUCTION................................................................................................................................... 4
2 QUESTION 1: DIFFERENT PARADIGMATIC POSITIONS..........................................................................5
3 QUESTION2:PARADIGMATIC ASSUMPTIONS....................................................................................7
2.1 The Afrocentric decolonial/indigenous/postcolonial paradigmatic position.......................................7
2.2 The difference between epistemology of positivism and epistemology of interpretivism............8
2.3 Critique the epistemological orientations of both positivism and interpretivism from a
decolonial/indigenous/postcolonial position........................................................................................... 8
2.4 Realism and relativism as ontological positions and compare positivism, interpretivism and
critical realism ontologically..................................................................................................................... 9
2.5 The 'relationality' as an ethical framework (axiology) that informs the epistemology and
ontology of decolonial/indigenous/postcolonial paradigmatic positions...............................................10
2.6 The relationship between epistemology and methodology in research.....................................11
4 QUESTION 3: IT'S PERSONAL.............................................................................................................. 12
5 CONCLUSION..................................................................................................................................... 13
SOURCES CONSULTED................................................................................................................................ 14



2

Escuela, estudio y materia

Institución
Grado

Información del documento

Subido en
30 de agosto de 2022
Número de páginas
14
Escrito en
2022/2023
Tipo
Examen
Contiene
Preguntas y respuestas

Temas

$3.20
Accede al documento completo:

¿Documento equivocado? Cámbialo gratis Dentro de los 14 días posteriores a la compra y antes de descargarlo, puedes elegir otro documento. Puedes gastar el importe de nuevo.
Escrito por estudiantes que aprobaron
Inmediatamente disponible después del pago
Leer en línea o como PDF

Conoce al vendedor

Seller avatar
Los indicadores de reputación están sujetos a la cantidad de artículos vendidos por una tarifa y las reseñas que ha recibido por esos documentos. Hay tres niveles: Bronce, Plata y Oro. Cuanto mayor reputación, más podrás confiar en la calidad del trabajo del vendedor.
DoctorReinhad Chamberlain College Of Nursing
Seguir Necesitas iniciar sesión para seguir a otros usuarios o asignaturas
Vendido
2148
Miembro desde
4 año
Número de seguidores
1728
Documentos
5922
Última venta
1 semana hace
TOP SELLER CENTER

Welcome All to this page. Here you will find ; ALL DOCUMENTS, PACKAGE DEALS, FLASHCARDS AND 100% REVISED & CORRECT STUDY MATERIALS GUARANTEED A+. NB: ALWAYS WRITE A GOOD REVIEW WHEN YOU FIND MY DOCUMENTS OF SUCCOUR TO YOU. ALSO, REFER YOUR COLLEGUES TO MY ACCOUNT. ( Refer 3 and get 1 free document). AM AVAILABLE TO SERVE YOU ANY TIME. WISHING YOU SUCCESS IN YOUR STUDIES. THANK YOU.

3.7

298 reseñas

5
132
4
49
3
53
2
17
1
47

Documentos populares

Recientemente visto por ti

Por qué los estudiantes eligen Stuvia

Creado por compañeros estudiantes, verificado por reseñas

Calidad en la que puedes confiar: escrito por estudiantes que aprobaron y evaluado por otros que han usado estos resúmenes.

¿No estás satisfecho? Elige otro documento

¡No te preocupes! Puedes elegir directamente otro documento que se ajuste mejor a lo que buscas.

Paga como quieras, empieza a estudiar al instante

Sin suscripción, sin compromisos. Paga como estés acostumbrado con tarjeta de crédito y descarga tu documento PDF inmediatamente.

Student with book image

“Comprado, descargado y aprobado. Así de fácil puede ser.”

Alisha Student

Preguntas frecuentes