Examen
LEV3701 Assignment 1 Semester 2 2023
- Grado
- Institución
QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS
[Mostrar más]Vista previa 2 fuera de 8 páginas
Vista previa 2 fuera de 8 páginas
Añadir al carrito
Añadir al carrito
Vendedor
Seguir
msmartie11
Comentarios recibidos
Vista previa del contenido
LEV3701Assignment 1
Semester 2
2023
QUESTIONS WITH ANSWERS
[School]
[Course title]
, LEV3701 Assignment 1 Semester 2 2023
a. Mr C testifies in court about the theft of his car. During cross-examination
the defence alleges that Mr C is lying. The prosecutor accordingly calls Mr W
to come and testify that Mr C had earlier told him the same thing. Mr W’s
evidence is....
1. opinion evidence.
2. hearsay evidence.
3. circumstantial evidence.
4. evidence about a previous consistent statement.
In a court case where Mr. C is testifying about the theft of his car, the defense
accuses him of lying during cross-examination. To support Mr. C's credibility,
the prosecutor calls Mr. W as a witness. Mr. W testifies that Mr. C had
previously told him the same story about the car theft. This type of evidence is
categorized as "evidence about a previous consistent statement." It's used to
show that Mr. C's current testimony is consistent with what he had previously
stated, making his version of events more reliable.
b. Consider the following statements regarding marital privilege and choose
the correct option:
1. A third party that overhears a conversation between two spouses cannot
testify about that communication in a court of law.
This statement is partially true. Generally, a third party who overhears a
conversation between spouses might be prohibited from testifying about that
communication due to spousal privilege, which is intended to protect the
privacy of marital communications. However, there can be exceptions, and the
admissibility of such evidence might vary depending on the jurisdiction and
the circumstances.
This statement is false. Marital privilege can still apply to communications
made during the marriage, even after divorce. The termination of the
marriage does not necessarily remove the protection afforded by marital
privilege to certain confidential communications made between spouses.
Los beneficios de comprar resúmenes en Stuvia estan en línea:
Garantiza la calidad de los comentarios
Compradores de Stuvia evaluaron más de 700.000 resúmenes. Así estas seguro que compras los mejores documentos!
Compra fácil y rápido
Puedes pagar rápidamente y en una vez con iDeal, tarjeta de crédito o con tu crédito de Stuvia. Sin tener que hacerte miembro.
Enfócate en lo más importante
Tus compañeros escriben los resúmenes. Por eso tienes la seguridad que tienes un resumen actual y confiable. Así llegas a la conclusión rapidamente!
Preguntas frecuentes
What do I get when I buy this document?
You get a PDF, available immediately after your purchase. The purchased document is accessible anytime, anywhere and indefinitely through your profile.
100% de satisfacción garantizada: ¿Cómo funciona?
Nuestra garantía de satisfacción le asegura que siempre encontrará un documento de estudio a tu medida. Tu rellenas un formulario y nuestro equipo de atención al cliente se encarga del resto.
Who am I buying this summary from?
Stuvia is a marketplace, so you are not buying this document from us, but from seller msmartie11. Stuvia facilitates payment to the seller.
Will I be stuck with a subscription?
No, you only buy this summary for $3.00. You're not tied to anything after your purchase.
Can Stuvia be trusted?
4.6 stars on Google & Trustpilot (+1000 reviews)
45,681 summaries were sold in the last 30 days
Founded in 2010, the go-to place to buy summaries for 14 years now