100% de satisfacción garantizada Inmediatamente disponible después del pago Tanto en línea como en PDF No estas atado a nada
logo-home
COHEN final POSC 225 Nightingale College - Questions with complete solution $14.99   Añadir al carrito

Examen

COHEN final POSC 225 Nightingale College - Questions with complete solution

 5 vistas  0 compra
  • Grado
  • Institución

COHEN final POSC 225 Nightingale College - Questions with complete solution COHEN final POSC 225 Baron v Baltimore (Baron-Baltimore-bill of rights) - correct answer Allowed states to continue to practice the law as they saw fit w/out being subjected to bill of rights Schenck v US (Schenck-...

[Mostrar más]

Vista previa 2 fuera de 12  páginas

  • 2 de agosto de 2024
  • 12
  • 2024/2025
  • Examen
  • Preguntas y respuestas
avatar-seller
COHEN final POSC 225
Baron v Baltimore (Baron-Baltimore-bill of rights) - correct answer ✔Allowed
states to continue to practice the law as they saw fit w/out being subjected to
bill of rights


Schenck v US (Schenck-speech) - correct answer ✔Ruled Congress could
only regulate speech when protecting threatening evils that show a "clear &
present danger"


Stromberg v Cali (Stromberg-students-soviet flag) - correct answer ✔Ruled
plaintiff couldn't be fired for teaching student to pledge allegiance to soviet
union's flag bc it didn't constitute clear & present danger


Texas v Johnson (texas-express) - correct answer ✔Ruled flag burning was
legal bc it was expression of political opinion


Roth v US (roth-redeeming) - correct answer ✔Ruled work of art may be
deemed obscene when it is w/out redeeming social/cultural content according
to contemporary standards; ambiguous law


Miller v Cali (Cali-community standards) - correct answer ✔ruled that
whether something is obscene is to determinate by local communities rather
than states


Near v Minnesota (Near-nat'l security) - correct answer ✔rued government
can't sensor media unless it was an issue of nat'l security

, New York Times v US (PPP) - correct answer ✔ruled gov't didn't have
enough proof that publication of Pentagon Papers jeopardized nat'l security;
wouldn't exercise prior restrain


New York Times v Sullivan (sullivan-sue-slander-statements) - correct
answer ✔ruled that untruthful statements are not libel unless errors are made
knowingly & w/ reckless damage for the truth; public figures forfeit their right to
sue for libel and slander


Lemon v Kurtzman (lemon test) - correct answer ✔determines whether law
maintains separation of church and state; "lemon test" says law must have
nonreligious purpose, must not inhibit/advance a religion, & can't be entangled
in religion


*ambiguous, eventually replaced by neutrality test


Engel v Vitale (engel-illegal) - correct answer ✔ruled official/encouraged
school prayer was illegal bc schools are gov't funded


School district of Abington Township v Schempp (ab-bible) - correct answer
✔Ruled school-sponsored bible study was unconstitutional in schools


Cantwell v Connecticut (Cantwel-Connecticut-compelling) - correct answer
✔Ruled gov't must have "compelling gov't interest" when rejecting the free
exercise of religion clause
*ex. illegal drugs for religious reasons not protected by constitution


Free exercise clause - correct answer ✔Congress may not pass any
legislation prohibiting free exercise of religion

Los beneficios de comprar resúmenes en Stuvia estan en línea:

Garantiza la calidad de los comentarios

Garantiza la calidad de los comentarios

Compradores de Stuvia evaluaron más de 700.000 resúmenes. Así estas seguro que compras los mejores documentos!

Compra fácil y rápido

Compra fácil y rápido

Puedes pagar rápidamente y en una vez con iDeal, tarjeta de crédito o con tu crédito de Stuvia. Sin tener que hacerte miembro.

Enfócate en lo más importante

Enfócate en lo más importante

Tus compañeros escriben los resúmenes. Por eso tienes la seguridad que tienes un resumen actual y confiable. Así llegas a la conclusión rapidamente!

Preguntas frecuentes

What do I get when I buy this document?

You get a PDF, available immediately after your purchase. The purchased document is accessible anytime, anywhere and indefinitely through your profile.

100% de satisfacción garantizada: ¿Cómo funciona?

Nuestra garantía de satisfacción le asegura que siempre encontrará un documento de estudio a tu medida. Tu rellenas un formulario y nuestro equipo de atención al cliente se encarga del resto.

Who am I buying this summary from?

Stuvia is a marketplace, so you are not buying this document from us, but from seller flyhigher329. Stuvia facilitates payment to the seller.

Will I be stuck with a subscription?

No, you only buy this summary for $14.99. You're not tied to anything after your purchase.

Can Stuvia be trusted?

4.6 stars on Google & Trustpilot (+1000 reviews)

45,681 summaries were sold in the last 30 days

Founded in 2010, the go-to place to buy summaries for 14 years now

Empieza a vender
$14.99
  • (0)
  Añadir