Garantie de satisfaction à 100% Disponible immédiatement après paiement En ligne et en PDF Tu n'es attaché à rien
logo-home
Summary of European History L10: WW1 €4,79
Ajouter au panier

Resume

Summary of European History L10: WW1

 6 vues  0 fois vendu

I got a 20/20 with my summaries. Abbreviations: DRTR: divine right to rule E-G: Estates-General CC: Catholic Church AR: Ancien regime DL: Germany (Deutschland) WS: Welfare state SD: Social democracy SDs: social democrats CDs: Christian democrats O1H: on the one hand OOH: on the oth...

[Montrer plus]

Aperçu 2 sur 14  pages

  • 19 octobre 2021
  • 14
  • 2019/2020
  • Resume
Tous les documents sur ce sujet (24)
avatar-seller
emmamarchal
10: First World War
Content:
1. Introduction to WW1 (1914-1918)
1.1. WW1: a local conflict gone ‘global’
1.2. The July Crisis (1914)
1.3. Pre-war alliances
1.4. Allied Powers
1.5. Central Powers
1.6. Timeline
1.7. WW1: a truly global conflict

2. The blame question: causes and responsibilities for WW1
3. The “short war illusion”: trench warfare and attrition


1. Introduction to WW1 (1914-1918)
● Paradox:
- At the beginning of 20C, most Europeans thought they were heading for a historical plateau, full of
benign progress and abundant civilisation.
“Le belle epoque”
- At the same time, European states had never maintained such huge armies during peacetime than at
the start of C20.
- Huge standing armies and trained reserves among the civilian population.
La belle epoque: growth of the MC, improved access to parliament, explosion of artistic creativity.
Long lasting peace on the ECont (except for minor battles). - but relative peace; any rivalries take the form of
colonial battles.

But for the first time in European history, there was military expertise among the civilian population. - Before,
in times of war, adult men were called to duty but often lacked training.
==> So at the same time growing distrust, states investing in military equipment.

==> This paradox emphasises that no single country can be blamed for the outbreak of WW1.
It should be attributed to a general breakdown of IR. - no concert of Europe anymore.
With the rise of Germany as the main power in Europe, the system of balancing the different antagonisms is
completely breaking down.

1.1. WW1: a local conflict gone ‘global’
28 June 1914
Franz Ferdinand - Archduke of Austria-Hungary, heir to the A-H throne.
Shot in Sarajevo by someone from a nationalist movement protesting against the foreign rule of A-H.
Assassination is a trivial event in the spectrum of history.
^ is to be situated at the beginning of the outbreak of WW1.

Austria-Hungary (1867): a multi-ethnic, multi-linguistic empire.
Following a compromise between Austria and Germany, A-H is founded.
~52 million ==> immense empire (3rd most populated empire after DL and Russia)
Split up between 3 big groups:
- Austrian ~ 55% of the population
- Hungarian ~ 40%
- Condominium of Bosnia-Herzegovina (joint control (A and H)): 3.8% pop
Linguistic complexity:
- German-speaking Austrian: 23%
- Hungarian minority: 19%

, ==> Even though it’s split up as Austria-Hungary, there’s still a lot of linguistic and ethnic diversity. (Slovaks,
Czechs, Romanian, … )
==> Makes it very difficult to govern;
End of C19, lots of nationalist sentiments on the rise, creating internal instability to the empire.

A-H (Dual Monarchy): formed in 1867, as a result of a Austrio-Hungarian compromise.
● Result of Austrian Empire’s defeat in the Austro-Prussian War; Austria on the verge of collapse.
● Compromise with the Hungarians - blending their rule saved the Habsburg Monarch and transformed
Austria into a dual monarchy.
○ Hungary received full autonomy within the empire, but accepted that in foreign affairs (IR,
war), the empire would act as one state.
○ No common PM, cabinet or parliament, no common citizenship.
○ A common customs union, coinage and postal service.
○ A Gemeinsamer Ministerrat: Crown Council in which ministers of war and foreign affairs &
the PMs met under the presidency of the monarch.
Lots of conflict broke out over the customs union - its design, which groups it would be affecting.

==> Very federal and confederal logic.
- Very few things are done together; two empires that are merging, but common layer remains very thin.
==> also makes it very difficult to control the territory.
- Some regulations don’t apply in both parts.
- + question of joint control over Bosnia-Herzegovina.
==> Very complex structure.
● Imbalance: German- and Hungarian-speaking groups are minorities: both only ~42% of the
population.
○ ==> foreign minorities’ rule felt fabricated.
● Heightened nationalist sentiment: compromise inspired movements for the restoration of states’
rights in Bohemia, Galicia.
○ Serbia had gained independence before and was laying claim to a part of B-H (so was Croatia).
● 1908: annexation of Bosnia-Herzegovina by A-H.
○ Before that, it was under joint control; now formally annexed.
○ Rejected Serbian and Croatian claims to B-H; promoted Bosnian identity.
■ Tried to make B-H stand out as a separate entity, yet as part of A-H empire. - fuelling
a Bosnian identity to delude the claims of Croatia and Serbia.
A-H - in an attempt to deal with natinoalist sentiment - in the beginning gave lots of rights and even promoted
cultural organisations. (teaching folklore traditions, teach minority languages)
○ Promoted citizen participation in these “cultural movements” because it believed this would
distract them from political affairs. ==> Elites in A-H favored this movement as a way to shift
attention away from political issues.
○ Often failed to grasp that these movements often were fertile ground for political
organisations. -> were often very intertwined.
By 1906 - lots of resistance against annexation of B-H.
Especially from Serbia - it challenged any “Greater Serbian” aspirations. - lots of contestations.

“Greater Serbia” aspirations:
Leads to the creation of
- Various cultural associations - but also increasingly militant, even terrorist ones.
- Ex. Black Hand Secret Society - attack by Gavrilo Princip, Bosnian Serb.

● Assassination = direct threat to Austrian stability.

Les avantages d'acheter des résumés chez Stuvia:

Qualité garantie par les avis des clients

Qualité garantie par les avis des clients

Les clients de Stuvia ont évalués plus de 700 000 résumés. C'est comme ça que vous savez que vous achetez les meilleurs documents.

L’achat facile et rapide

L’achat facile et rapide

Vous pouvez payer rapidement avec iDeal, carte de crédit ou Stuvia-crédit pour les résumés. Il n'y a pas d'adhésion nécessaire.

Focus sur l’essentiel

Focus sur l’essentiel

Vos camarades écrivent eux-mêmes les notes d’étude, c’est pourquoi les documents sont toujours fiables et à jour. Cela garantit que vous arrivez rapidement au coeur du matériel.

Foire aux questions

Qu'est-ce que j'obtiens en achetant ce document ?

Vous obtenez un PDF, disponible immédiatement après votre achat. Le document acheté est accessible à tout moment, n'importe où et indéfiniment via votre profil.

Garantie de remboursement : comment ça marche ?

Notre garantie de satisfaction garantit que vous trouverez toujours un document d'étude qui vous convient. Vous remplissez un formulaire et notre équipe du service client s'occupe du reste.

Auprès de qui est-ce que j'achète ce résumé ?

Stuvia est une place de marché. Alors, vous n'achetez donc pas ce document chez nous, mais auprès du vendeur emmamarchal. Stuvia facilite les paiements au vendeur.

Est-ce que j'aurai un abonnement?

Non, vous n'achetez ce résumé que pour €4,79. Vous n'êtes lié à rien après votre achat.

Peut-on faire confiance à Stuvia ?

4.6 étoiles sur Google & Trustpilot (+1000 avis)

53068 résumés ont été vendus ces 30 derniers jours

Fondée en 2010, la référence pour acheter des résumés depuis déjà 14 ans

Commencez à vendre!
€4,79
  • (0)
Ajouter au panier
Ajouté