History for Edexcel A Level: Democracies in change: Britain and the USA in the twentieth century
Summarised, condensed, easy to understand revision notes
Education and widening opportunities
Education policy 1918-43, The significance of the Butler Act 1944, The development of comprehensive education to 1979, The growth and social impact of university education 1918-79
Britain Transformed A-Level History Thatcher Summary Notes: Economics
Britain Transformed A-Level History Thatcher Summary Notes: Division
Britain Transformed A-Level History Thatcher Summary Notes: State
Tout pour ce livre (22)
École, étude et sujet
A/AS Level
PEARSON (PEARSON)
History 2015
Unit 1H - Britain transformed, 1918-97
Tous les documents sur ce sujet (67)
3
revues
Par: jolines • 1 année de cela
Par: harryswayne10 • 1 année de cela
Par: shaylaskyebrady • 2 année de cela
Vendeur
S'abonner
lilylogan101
Avis reçus
Aperçu du contenu
To what extent has educational reform led to widening opportunity 1918-79?
1918-31 Secondary education
- Education prior to 1918 was provided by Local Education - Predominantly middle-class children
Authorities and provision was variable - 1918-44 – education was only compulsory up to age 14
- Education in the interwar years was largely dictated by - In 1940, only 13% of working-class children aged 13+ were
economic conditions and costs in school
- Inadequacies were highlighted in the poor educational - Uneven nature of educational provision – in 1931, only 20%
attainment and skills of many military personnel during the of children in some form of secondary education and many
war would leave at 14
- Grammar schools offered scholarships for the brightest
1918 Education Act students and provided excellent education
- Granted significant responsibilities to educational - However, they were based on wealth as poorer parents
authorities, providing them with funding could not afford them due to fees meaning they were mainly
- Recommended school leaving age of 14 for the middle-class
- County colleges to provide vocational training for school
leavers up to the age of 18, but this didn’t always happen Universities
because of cost - In 1919, the government funded universities
- Divided curriculum between ‘practical instruction’ for less - Became more accessible to the middle-class and women by
able children and ‘advanced construction’ for brighter 1918 leading to a diverse and expansion of educational
children provision
- Centralised school financing - Government-funded teacher-training grants provided good
- Improved school teachers’ salaries and pensions opportunities for bright working-class students as they
- Government hoped it would improve school standards agreed to follow their degree with post graduate training
with a commitment to teaching after
1926 Haddow Committee - Red brick increasingly took on more middle-class and bright
- Recognised the diversity of educational provision in different working-class students funded through grants and offered by
areas LEAs though some were more generous than others
- Abolition of elementary schools and the division into primary - Oxbridge remained the domain of the privileged
and secondary schools at age 11 - Less than 10,000 university students in red bricks
- School leaving age to 15 - Most governments of the 1920s and 1930s considered
- Recommendations were not adopted due to cost university education irrelevant to their overall goals
- 328 authorities meant there was a lack of universality
- Huge class sizes with 60 pupils in some cases 1931-39
- Geddes Axe of 1926 meant financial constraints limited their - 1930s – only 1.7% of 18-year-olds went to university
success
- Educational reform was not a priority
- Issues with gender authority
, To what extent has educational reform led to widening opportunity 1918-79?
1939-45
- WW2 led to a recognition of the variance in the provision Tripartite system
and quality of education - Grammar schools
- These inequalities were key in reinforcing the class system – o Based on academic ability as entrants had to pass the
limited opportunities for the working-class meant they were 11+ exam
trapped in cycles of poverty o Provided greater opportunities for many working-class
children
Beveridge Report, 1942 o Critics argued it was impossible to tell how a child would
- Ignorance identified as one of the five evils intellectually develop at age 11
- WW2 required educated troops as the technological - Secondary modern schools
complexity of modern warfare increased o Based on functional ability
- Armed forced had to teach basic literacy and numeracy to o Educated the majority of lower middle-class and
recruits working-class children
o Offered innovative curricula appropriate for their intake
Butler Act, 1944 o Developed close ties with local collages so pupils could
- Made access to secondary education possible for all transfer onto vocational courses and embark on work
- Free schooling, compulsory secondary education placements
- Girls could attend secondaries o Received fewer resources and less qualified teachers
- Raised leaving age to 15 than grammar schools
- Tripartite system – grammar, secondary modern and o 75% of children went onto secondary moderns in the
technical post-war period, but in 1964, only 318 of their total
- 11+ provided opportunities intakes entered for A levels
- Millions of working-class students had free, compulsory - Technical schools
education o Based on technical ability
- Increased educational opportunities for females who were o Intended to educate the middle-class for
previously excluded from secondary education scientific/engineering careers in order to create a
- Social change in the 1960s and 1970s was partly a result of technocratic class who could help the country adapt in
the act as it enabled children to become more educated an age of high technology and nuclear power
- Left of Labour viewed the tripartite system as socially o Only few were built due to cost
decisive – grammar schools received the most resources
o Intake never exceeded 3% of secondary students
whilst secondary moderns were left underfunded with an
unsatisfactory curriculum, grammar schools only took 20-
Universities
Les avantages d'acheter des résumés chez Stuvia:
Qualité garantie par les avis des clients
Les clients de Stuvia ont évalués plus de 700 000 résumés. C'est comme ça que vous savez que vous achetez les meilleurs documents.
L’achat facile et rapide
Vous pouvez payer rapidement avec iDeal, carte de crédit ou Stuvia-crédit pour les résumés. Il n'y a pas d'adhésion nécessaire.
Focus sur l’essentiel
Vos camarades écrivent eux-mêmes les notes d’étude, c’est pourquoi les documents sont toujours fiables et à jour. Cela garantit que vous arrivez rapidement au coeur du matériel.
Foire aux questions
Qu'est-ce que j'obtiens en achetant ce document ?
Vous obtenez un PDF, disponible immédiatement après votre achat. Le document acheté est accessible à tout moment, n'importe où et indéfiniment via votre profil.
Garantie de remboursement : comment ça marche ?
Notre garantie de satisfaction garantit que vous trouverez toujours un document d'étude qui vous convient. Vous remplissez un formulaire et notre équipe du service client s'occupe du reste.
Auprès de qui est-ce que j'achète ce résumé ?
Stuvia est une place de marché. Alors, vous n'achetez donc pas ce document chez nous, mais auprès du vendeur lilylogan101. Stuvia facilite les paiements au vendeur.
Est-ce que j'aurai un abonnement?
Non, vous n'achetez ce résumé que pour €3,68. Vous n'êtes lié à rien après votre achat.
