Garantie de satisfaction à 100% Disponible immédiatement après paiement En ligne et en PDF Tu n'es attaché à rien
Recherché précédemment par vous
Essay: Compare the ways in which Atwood and Shelley portray anxieties about scientific development in 'Frankenstein' and 'The Handmaid's Tale'€7,97
Ajouter au panier
A* Graded practice essay for Pearson Edexcel Unit-2, Prose. This essay compares Shelley and Atwood's portrayal of anxieties about scientific development in their respective novels. Covers all targets, including context and analysis of language.
Compare the way in which writers portray anxieties about scientific development
In both ‘The handmaid’s tale’ and ‘Frankenstein’, authors explore the anxiety felt both by
individuals but also society as a whole, in response to scientific development. In particular,
Shelley focuses on the implications that come with the creation of a creature, thereby
defying the order of the natural world and (in the consideration of an 18 th century Christian
society), god. Equally, Atwood also explores the implications of science, however she
somewhat upturns Shelley’s exploration by the construction of a highly-hyperbolised society
in which the accumulation of society’s scientific fears has resulted in the eradication of
scientific development all together.
Moreover, Atwood presents society’s fears of the past, rooted in the scientific processes
which used to be involved in the reproductive process ‘once they drugged women, induced
labour, cut them open, sewed them up. No more’, indeed Aunt Lydia’s harsh use of the verbs
‘drugged’, ‘induced’, ‘cut’ and ‘sewed’ gives connotations of the unnecessary violence
associated with modern childbirth; it almost makes the women sound inhuman, ‘like a
broken robot’ as conveyed through this use of simile. Furthermore, here we are able to see
the anxieties which led to the creation of Gilead and the more natural process which is then
taken on, as it is seen as more fitting of the traditional puritan ideals of the society. Atwood
particularly draws on the real scientific fears and objections of radical conservative
movements such as ‘The new right’, who believed in the traditionalisation of society. Again,
the author has simply hyperbolised these fears in order to convey how monstrous a society
could be created if such radical ideals were accepted, simply in the wake of scientific
anxiety. In another way, Shelley also hyperbolises scientific ideals from her own time and
society, drawing on the enlightenist endeavours of great scientists, such as Aldini and Volta,
who explored the use of electricity in scientific and anatomical development, in order to re-
animate or create new life. Moreover, Shelley portrays a particularly gothic scene, fitting of
the novel’s genre, with the purpose of inducing terror in the reader, thereby portraying the
reality of what results could come about from defying nature in such a way ‘I saw the dull
yellow eye of the creature open, and a convulsive motion agitated it’s limbs’ . Indeed,
Shelley uses harsh verbs here , much like Atwood’s use of the violent ‘cut’ and ‘sewed’, such
as ‘agitated’, particularly in relation to the use of the pre-modifying adjective ‘convulsive’ ;
language which adds all the more to this gothic portrayal of reproductive creation. Here,
both female authors are able to indicate fears of reproductive science in particular, as
Shelley criticises the unnatural process of creating life without the involvement of a female,
whereas Atwood explores the extremity that can result from removing science from the
reproductive process, and thereby the ultimate subjegative effect on women.
The use of narration in both novels creates a particularly different view of scientific
development in each case, as Atwood writes from the first person feminine perspective of
‘Offred’, somone who is deeply affected by society’s scientific anxieties, in their search for
‘ripeness, for rot’ ; she is exploited for her fertility in a society where most women are
Les avantages d'acheter des résumés chez Stuvia:
Qualité garantie par les avis des clients
Les clients de Stuvia ont évalués plus de 700 000 résumés. C'est comme ça que vous savez que vous achetez les meilleurs documents.
L’achat facile et rapide
Vous pouvez payer rapidement avec iDeal, carte de crédit ou Stuvia-crédit pour les résumés. Il n'y a pas d'adhésion nécessaire.
Focus sur l’essentiel
Vos camarades écrivent eux-mêmes les notes d’étude, c’est pourquoi les documents sont toujours fiables et à jour. Cela garantit que vous arrivez rapidement au coeur du matériel.
Foire aux questions
Qu'est-ce que j'obtiens en achetant ce document ?
Vous obtenez un PDF, disponible immédiatement après votre achat. Le document acheté est accessible à tout moment, n'importe où et indéfiniment via votre profil.
Garantie de remboursement : comment ça marche ?
Notre garantie de satisfaction garantit que vous trouverez toujours un document d'étude qui vous convient. Vous remplissez un formulaire et notre équipe du service client s'occupe du reste.
Auprès de qui est-ce que j'achète ce résumé ?
Stuvia est une place de marché. Alors, vous n'achetez donc pas ce document chez nous, mais auprès du vendeur abbiemccracken810. Stuvia facilite les paiements au vendeur.
Est-ce que j'aurai un abonnement?
Non, vous n'achetez ce résumé que pour €7,97. Vous n'êtes lié à rien après votre achat.
