In this document you will find the first classical theories, together with the presentations of group 1.
As not every presentation was clear, I asked group 2's presentation in order to complete the theory of each contemporary sociologist.
My presentation about Habermas is missing but you we sha...
Table of Contents
Introduction- Sociological perspectives...........................................................................................................................2
Class 2: Formal sociology...............................................................................................................................................12
Class 4: The sociology of social action...........................................................................................................................21
Class 5: Symbolic interactionism...................................................................................................................................28
Nobert Elias – Figurational Sociology............................................................................................................................35
Giddens- structuration theory.......................................................................................................................................43
Foucault’s ongoing process...........................................................................................................................................49
I-Who is Michel Foucault...........................................................................................................................................49
A-The man behind the theory...................................................................................................................................49
Bauman – Liquid modernity..........................................................................................................................................55
Oral exam (2/3)
1) Abstract
Situate within the four classical perspectives
Argue
Micro/macro, Structure/culture, Criteria
2) Theory question/Reader question
Reader: application test: what’s the methodological perspective or the theoritcal perspective?
3) Contemporary perspectives
Discuss how AUTHOR tries to transcend the structure-agency dilemma. Do you think he succeeds in bridging the
two?
1
,Introduction- Sociological perspectives
Not about theories but perspectiveslenses that sociologists can use to look at social reality
In between a methodological (=define what we will look at) and theoretical
We focus both on classic and contemporary sociological perspectives
A) Focus on:
• Broad visions/directions in sociology
No specific theories/themes
Analytical distinction (=we’ll look at the angles)
Not always consciously applied (not that the sociologists wakes up and says: “today i’ll be
functionalist it’s based on the kind of questions you want to answer)
Sometimes mixed in sociological literature it’s not that clear cut as shown in class
Just like any lense: it will distort your reality
B) Distinction
• Substantive perspectives What is studied
o Structuralism, Formal sociology, Sociology of social action, Symbolic interactionism
• Methodological perspectives How do you study
o Positivism, Functionalism, Interpretative sociology
o Functionalism we can also put the conflict perspective (they are each other’s opposite)
o Methodological and substantive perspective are intermixed
Substantive + methodological: Paradigm
C) Substantive perspective
1- Micro- macro distinction
• Interaction between agents (what people do, without looking at the collectivity)
• Collectivities: when we look at thing that are shared in a collectivity
o !!!! NOT only society
o DON’T have to be only people- can be also countries
2- Culture-structure distinction
You see buildings and from there you can imagine a little their relation (people in a building know the people in the
same building compared to people from another building e.g technicum in Ghent)
• Meaning once we are interested in how people give meaning of things = cultural perspective
o How people see reality themselves (culture: meaning- making)
o Need to join every perspective of everyone for sociologists (otherwise: individual psychology)
• Position (no meaning) structure
o e.g where you sit
2
, Examples:
Durkheim: social facts structural properties of society structure and
macro
Sociology of social action (Weber) also interested in the collectivity but
more in what people think (protest ethic and capitalism the way
protestants think enables capitalism)
attitudes shared to the people belonging to the same group
Formal sociology position that people take and how that affects the interactions that people have (eg interaction
with someone that is dependent upon you or if you have an interaction without someone of power)
Dealing with day-to-day interaction
Symbolic interactionism: how do people interact and how do this change how people think
How do they look at themselves in a day-to-day interaction and how that creates a meaning
Ethno-methodology: HOW we say it
D)Three criteria
• Voluntarism Structure vs agency
o Voluntaristic: author gives from freedom to the units
o Not: focus on what determines people
!! not about ideology but on what we have to focus on
• Reductionism Sum & parts
o Reductionism: if people when they come together and form a group don’t form something extra
o Anti-reductionism: when all the members of the group go home, there is something left
Eg Durkheim we have made law systems and it’s difficult to change it even if we leave
• Nominalism Perception
o Nominalism: when people don’t perceive something, it cannot affect them (eg you walk home in the
dark in a forest and there is a wolf looking at you: you’ll only be afraid of the wolf if you notice it)
o Anti-nominalism: you investigate of things that people are not aware of (studies of gender composition)
D) Historical setting
Fluctuation of popularity for sociologists based on the time we’re in
3
Les avantages d'acheter des résumés chez Stuvia:
Qualité garantie par les avis des clients
Les clients de Stuvia ont évalués plus de 700 000 résumés. C'est comme ça que vous savez que vous achetez les meilleurs documents.
L’achat facile et rapide
Vous pouvez payer rapidement avec iDeal, carte de crédit ou Stuvia-crédit pour les résumés. Il n'y a pas d'adhésion nécessaire.
Focus sur l’essentiel
Vos camarades écrivent eux-mêmes les notes d’étude, c’est pourquoi les documents sont toujours fiables et à jour. Cela garantit que vous arrivez rapidement au coeur du matériel.
Foire aux questions
Qu'est-ce que j'obtiens en achetant ce document ?
Vous obtenez un PDF, disponible immédiatement après votre achat. Le document acheté est accessible à tout moment, n'importe où et indéfiniment via votre profil.
Garantie de remboursement : comment ça marche ?
Notre garantie de satisfaction garantit que vous trouverez toujours un document d'étude qui vous convient. Vous remplissez un formulaire et notre équipe du service client s'occupe du reste.
Auprès de qui est-ce que j'achète ce résumé ?
Stuvia est une place de marché. Alors, vous n'achetez donc pas ce document chez nous, mais auprès du vendeur ElisaBreyne. Stuvia facilite les paiements au vendeur.
Est-ce que j'aurai un abonnement?
Non, vous n'achetez ce résumé que pour €5,99. Vous n'êtes lié à rien après votre achat.
