Evaluate the claim that natural law should be consulted when dealing with issues in sexual ethics(40).
4 vues 0 fois vendu
Cours
Sexual ethics
Établissement
OCR
Book
Oxford A Level Religious Studies for OCR
This document includes OCR A Level Religious Studies - Sexual ethics Essay. This is an example of an essay that could potentially come up. Some of the essays include summaries. I am an A* student and these essays are all at an A-A* standard. If you need further help, please contact me and I will be...
'Boethius’ ideas were successfully updated by St Anselm' Discuss(40)
How far is it true to claim that it is not necessary to resolve the conflicts between divine attributes.(40)
Have Boethius, Anselm or Swinburne successfully resolved problems connected with God’s attributes and human free will?
Tout pour ce livre (51)
École, étude et sujet
A/AS Level
OCR
Religious Studies
Sexual ethics
Tous les documents sur ce sujet (4)
Vendeur
S'abonner
kadjis
Avis reçus
Aperçu du contenu
Evaluate the claim that natural law should be consulted when dealing with issues in sexual
ethics(40) - Came up in the mock exam and got 36/40 15/16 in AO1 21/24 in AO3 = A*
Sexual ethics is an immensely controversial topic and consequently, there is a multitude of
personal moral issues and debates surrounding it. Social norms and laws about these questions
have changed considerably especially in western countries in recent decades. Natural law
proposed by St Thomas Aquinas is a teleological theory that looks to God and the world for
answers. Aquinas, influenced by Cicero and Aristotle, the founder of natural law, argued that we
all have a desire to do good and avoid evil and that we should fulfil our purpose to reach
eudaimonia. In regards to sexual ethics, natural law should be consulted as it produces more
harm for individuals.
Natural law presents a harmful approach to sexual ethics as it demeans people and the value of
their relationship. Aquinas unconvincingly argued that homosexuality was wrong and that it ‘is
intrinsically disorded’. Those who engage in homosexual behaviours have not used their reason
correctly to interpret the natural law but have instead chosen to follow the apparent good.
Following the primary precepts of reproduction, homosexuality would be considered wrong and
unnatural as homosexual sex does not allow for people to be fruitful and grow. Yet as
convincingly argued by Stephen Fry natural law promotes views that lead to the ‘stigmatisation
and victimisation’ that leads to playground bullying and statistics which show that the LGBTQ+
community is twice as more likely to contemplate suicide. Therefore, natural law should not be
consulted in matters of sexual ethics as it promotes views that are harmful to the LGBTQ+
community.
Additionally, natural law is restrictive and prevents people from exercising their autonomy.
Aquinas unconvincingly argued that sexual relations outside marriage(pre-marital sex) is wrong
and should not be the focus of relationships as we need to follow the primary precepts of living
in an ordered society. Yet in our secular society, marriage no longer holds the same value as it
did during Aquinas's time. Sex is no longer seen as just for reproduction since science shows
that our reproductive organs are also for pleasure. By consulting natural law on matters of
sexual ethics we prevent autonomy and we prevent people from acting freely and doing things
that cause no harm to anyone. Therefore, Instead of consulting natural law, J.S Mill's rule
utilitarianism should be consulted. Mill proposed the harm principle- people should be free to do
what they wish as long as their actions do not cause harm to anyone. Mills presents a
convincing approach as he grants people autonomy and emphasises that people should be free
to do whatever they want as long as it does not cause harm. He allows people to be happy and
allows the individuals to be in charge of the happiness in their life. Therefore, natural law should
not be consulted in matters concerning sexual ethics as it restricts autonomy, unlike rule
utilitarianism.
Furthermore, natural law in its absolutist ways fails to acknowledge the harmful results that can
occur from always following the primary precepts. The primary precepts are essential in the
functioning of society. According to Aquinas, we should use our reason and follow primary
precepts and the secondary precepts which follow on from the primary precepts. The primary
Les avantages d'acheter des résumés chez Stuvia:
Qualité garantie par les avis des clients
Les clients de Stuvia ont évalués plus de 700 000 résumés. C'est comme ça que vous savez que vous achetez les meilleurs documents.
L’achat facile et rapide
Vous pouvez payer rapidement avec iDeal, carte de crédit ou Stuvia-crédit pour les résumés. Il n'y a pas d'adhésion nécessaire.
Focus sur l’essentiel
Vos camarades écrivent eux-mêmes les notes d’étude, c’est pourquoi les documents sont toujours fiables et à jour. Cela garantit que vous arrivez rapidement au coeur du matériel.
Foire aux questions
Qu'est-ce que j'obtiens en achetant ce document ?
Vous obtenez un PDF, disponible immédiatement après votre achat. Le document acheté est accessible à tout moment, n'importe où et indéfiniment via votre profil.
Garantie de remboursement : comment ça marche ?
Notre garantie de satisfaction garantit que vous trouverez toujours un document d'étude qui vous convient. Vous remplissez un formulaire et notre équipe du service client s'occupe du reste.
Auprès de qui est-ce que j'achète ce résumé ?
Stuvia est une place de marché. Alors, vous n'achetez donc pas ce document chez nous, mais auprès du vendeur kadjis. Stuvia facilite les paiements au vendeur.
Est-ce que j'aurai un abonnement?
Non, vous n'achetez ce résumé que pour €4,33. Vous n'êtes lié à rien après votre achat.
