Resume
Samenvatting Neuropsychology And Psychopharmacology - Deel Op De Beeck
- Établissement
- Katholieke Universiteit Leuven (KU Leuven)
Engelstalige samenvatting van college notities + boek Neuropsychology
[Montrer plus]
1 vérifier
Par: stuviausermv • 1 mois de cela
Aperçu du contenu
Op De BeeckNeurologie
Dingen die hij niet zei in de les maar wel in te kennen pagina’s staan -> in klein
Les 1: The lesioned and stimulated brain (HF1 + 5)
CH1: LESIONED BRAIN
Mind and brain: empirical example
- Penfield: brain surgery to cure epilepsy
▪ Electrically stimulation parts of the brain (brain regions still intact?) -> fascinating experiences
▪ Not painful
▪ Electrical stimulating brain -> relive experiences (more real than just memories)
▪ Different areas -> different experiences
- Cognition: higher mental processes (thinking, speaking, acting, planning)
- Cognitive neuroscience: provides a brain-based account of cognitive and behavioural processes (perceiving,
remembering,..)
▪ Made possible by technological advances (safer, less crude)
Cognitive neuroscience in historical perspective
Philosophical approaches to mind and brain
- Mental experiences arise from…
▪ Heart: Aristoteles (heart is centre of the soul, brain is organ that cools the blood)
▪ Brain: Plato
- Mind-body problem: how can a physical substance (brain/body) give rise to a mental experience
▪ Dualism: mind and body separate substances (Descartes)
. Mind: non-physical, immortal
. Body: physical, mortal
. Interaction: pineal gland
▪ Dual-aspect theory: mind and body are two levels of explanation of the same thing (Spinoza)
▪ Reductionism: mind eventually explained solely in terms of biological/physical theory (Churchland)
. Ex: emotions can be explained in terms of neural firing
. Ex: phlogiston
‘Flammable’ component in a substance
In reality: chemical reaction with oxygen
Scientific approaches to mind and brain
- Aristoteles: ratio brain size-body size -> greatest in intellectual species
▪ How larger the intellect how lager the brain (cooling element)
▪ Ventricles are important
- Before 18th century: cortex drawn schematically or misinterpreted like intestines
- Gall & Spurzheim (1810): accurate depiction of the features of the brain (phrenology)
- Phrenology
▪ 1. Functional specialization: different parts of cortex have different functions (only this was correct)
. Functions they were talking about were different (ex: love for animals)
▪ 2. Differences in personality traits -> differences in cortical size and bumps on skull
. Crude division of psychological traits (ex: love)
- Modern cognitive neuroscience uses empirical neuroscience methods to ascertain different cognitive functions
▪ Does not assume that every region has 1 function
▪ Does not assume that every function has 1 region
▪ Does assume some degree of functional specialisation
- Functional specialisation
▪ Broca: patients with brain damage -> couldn’t speak, no further cognitive defaults
. Language is in 1 part of the brain
1
,Op De Beeck
. Specific fallout in function
▪ Wernicke: patient with bad comprehension & good production
. At least 2 language faculties in the brain that can be independently affected by damage
. Inference can be made without knowing where in the brain they are located
Cognitive neuropsychology
▪ Cognitive neuropsychology: study of brain damaged patients to inform theories of normal cognition
- Maps of the brain – Broadmann area
▪ 17: primary visual cortex
▪ 4: primary motor cortex
▪ 1,2,3: primary somatosensory cortex
▪ Functions
. Blue: motor cortex
. Purple: visual cortex
. Grey: outer cortex
▪ Deeper in the cortex -> executive functions
COMPUTER METAPHOR
- Computer metaphor: minds without brains
▪ 20th century: observations of behaviour, not observation of the brain during behaviour
. Models of cognition without direct reference to the brain
. Does not mean dualism! Was just practical
▪ Information-processing models (1950)
. Mind as a series of routines, like those found in computers
. Perception -> attention -> memory
▪ Connectionist models: mathematical (computational) in nature but don’t
involve serial processing and discrete routines
- Theory of modularity – (Fodor): certain processes are restricted in the type of information they process
▪ 1. Modules: domain specificity, only process certain type of information (shape, colour, faces,…)
▪ 2. Central systems: domain independent, non-specific information (memory, attention,…)
▪ Advantage: fast, efficient, in isolation from other systems
▪ Criticism: only means of acquiring is domain specific, systems are not innate
. Ex: reading can’t be innate, is new in evolution
- Computer metaphor/modules plausible?
▪ Interactivity: later stages of processing can begin before earlier stages are complete
▪ Top down: later stages influence earlier stages (memory influences perception)
▪ Bottom up: passage of info from simpler to more complex
▪ Parallel processing: different information is processed at the same time
The birth of cognitive neuroscience
- 1970: structural imaging methods (CT, MRI): precise images of brain/brain legions
- 1980: PET adapted to models of cognition developed by psychologists
- 1985: TMS first used (equivalent of Penfield)
- 1990: fMRI principle: level of oxygen in blood used as a measure of cognitive function
- Technology -> functional imaging + precisely describing brain lesions
- Stimulation
▪ Past: direct stimulation to brain (Parkinson)
▪ Now: transcranial stimulation across the skull
. TMS: transcranial magnetic stimulation
. tES: transcranial electrical stimulation
- Electrical/magnetic: changes in electric and magnetic properties of the cell
- Functional imaging (PET, fMRI, fNIRS): changes in blood supply
- Temporal resolution: when an event is occurring
▪ EEG, MEG, TMS, single cell -> resolution in milliseconds
▪ fMRI -> resolution in seconds
2
, Op De Beeck
- Spatial resolution: where an event is occurring
▪ Functional imaging & lesions -> millimetres
▪ Single cell -> at level of neurons
- Invasiveness: internal or external
▪ Internal: good spatial and temporal resolution
Method Type Invasiveness Brain property
EEG/ERP Recording Non-invasive Electrical
Single cell/multi-unit recording Recording Invasive Electrical
TMS Stimulation Non-invasive Electromagnetic
tES Stimulation Non-invasive Electrical
MEG Recording Non-invasive Magnetic
PET Recording Invasive Hemodynamic
fMRI Recording Non-invasive Hemodynamic
fNIRS Recording Non-invasive Hemodynamic
CH5: STIMULATED BRAIN
- Here: causal method’s
- Patient clip – alien hand
▪ Woman has no control over 1 arm, arm doesn’t listen to her
▪ Problem with corpus callosum -> signals don’t get through to the other side
▪ Doesn’t always go away, hard to treat
. U should keep the hand busy
- Classical cases
▪ Tan: language
▪ Phineas Cage: personality
▪ HM: memory
▪ DF: object recognition
- Reverse engineering: infer the function of a region by removing it and measuring the effect of the rest of the -
system (what can(‘t) the person still do)
- Disruption of brain functions come about through…
▪ Natural damage: stroke, trauma
▪ Elicited damage: animal models
▪ Harmless temporary changes induced electro-magnetically: TMS
Brain manipulation models
- Non-invasive brain stimulation (NBIS)
▪ Green in picture (non-invasive)
▪ TMS: magnetic stimulation -> producing virtual/reversible lesions
▪ tES: temporarily disrupting cognitive function OR boosting cognition
Ways of acquiring brain damage
- Neurosurgery
▪ Removing source of epilepsy
. Patient HM: amnesia after removing piece of medial temporal lobe
Amygdala + hippocampus taken away
▪ Split brain: sever fibers of corpus callosum (reduce spreading of seizures)
. Not much impairment in daily life, can be seen in experimental conditions
- Strokes (cerebrovascular accident - CVA)
▪ CVA: accident in the arteries (vascular) of the brain (cerebro), disruption of blood supply to brain
. Global or local death of neurons
▪ Very common
. 15% will not survive
. 50% will have long-lasting impairments
3
, Op De Beeck
▪ 2 types
. Ischemic infarction (80%, beroerte/herseninfarct)
Vessel blocked by fatty clot
Embolism: clot pushed from larger vessel to smaller
Thrombosis: stationary clot blocks vessel
Middle cerebral artery (80%)
Posterioir cerebral artery (5-10%)
Antererioir cerebral artery (0.6-3%)
. Haemorrhage/bleeding (20%, hersenbloeding)
Blood vessel ruptures
Increases intracranial pressure
More susceptible: born with aneurysms
Aneurysm: over-elastic region of artery -> ruptures more easily
▪ Angiomas: tangled blood vessels liable to rupture
▪ Arteriosclerosis: hardening of vessel walls
- Traumatic brain injury
▪ Most common in 0-40, more in men
▪ Coup: site of impact
▪ Contrecoup: brain pushed against skull
▪ Open injury: fractured skull, localized
▪ Closed injury: wide effects, loss of consciousness
. Diffuse axonal injury: damage/rupture between cell body and axon
- Tumours
▪ 2nd most common site for tumours (after uterus)
▪ Often metastatic
▪ Tumour: mass of new tissue that persists and grows independently
▪ Classification
. Benign vs malign
. Encapsuled vs infiltrating
. Primary vs secondary
. Cell types: meninges vs glia
Meningioma vs glioblastoma
▪ Puts pressure on neurons -> disrupt functioning, leading to cell death
- Viral infections
▪ Invasion of the body by disease-producing microorganisms & subsequent tissue reactions
▪ How do infections kill neural cells
. Interference with blood supply
. Disturb glucose or oxygen metabolism
. Alter cell membranes
. Form pus
. Cause edema
▪ Mostly widespread brain damage
▪ Ex: HSE (herpes simplex encephalitis), HIV, CJD (Creutzfeldt Jakob disease)
- Neurodegenerative disorders (zie foto’s op slides)
▪ Increasing impairments in one or more cognitive functions
▪ Atrophy of cells in brain -> memory loss
▪ Different types
. Alzheimer
. Frontotemporal dementia (Pick’s disease) -> very localized
. Huntington
. Parkinson
. Multi-infarct (vascular) dementia -> common
4
Les avantages d'acheter des résumés chez Stuvia:
Qualité garantie par les avis des clients
Les clients de Stuvia ont évalués plus de 700 000 résumés. C'est comme ça que vous savez que vous achetez les meilleurs documents.
L’achat facile et rapide
Vous pouvez payer rapidement avec iDeal, carte de crédit ou Stuvia-crédit pour les résumés. Il n'y a pas d'adhésion nécessaire.
Focus sur l’essentiel
Vos camarades écrivent eux-mêmes les notes d’étude, c’est pourquoi les documents sont toujours fiables et à jour. Cela garantit que vous arrivez rapidement au coeur du matériel.
Foire aux questions
Qu'est-ce que j'obtiens en achetant ce document ?
Vous obtenez un PDF, disponible immédiatement après votre achat. Le document acheté est accessible à tout moment, n'importe où et indéfiniment via votre profil.
Garantie de remboursement : comment ça marche ?
Notre garantie de satisfaction garantit que vous trouverez toujours un document d'étude qui vous convient. Vous remplissez un formulaire et notre équipe du service client s'occupe du reste.
Auprès de qui est-ce que j'achète ce résumé ?
Stuvia est une place de marché. Alors, vous n'achetez donc pas ce document chez nous, mais auprès du vendeur PsychologieStudent1303. Stuvia facilite les paiements au vendeur.
Est-ce que j'aurai un abonnement?
Non, vous n'achetez ce résumé que pour €5,69. Vous n'êtes lié à rien après votre achat.
Peut-on faire confiance à Stuvia ?
4.6 étoiles sur Google & Trustpilot (+1000 avis)
78075 résumés ont été vendus ces 30 derniers jours
Fondée en 2010, la référence pour acheter des résumés depuis déjà 14 ans