Revision notes on Legitimacy and Democracy in Political Theory. Topics covered:
- Legitimacy
- Democracy
- Authority
- Intrinsic and instrumental view of democracy
- Procedural democracy
- Democratic equality
- Social choice theory
- Epistocracy
- Publicity and representation
- Judicial review
- Ra...
PO301 Legitimacy and Democracy
Adam Swift: ‘Political Philosophy: A Student’s Guide’
Relationship between distributive and political justice:
Are they coincident?
Do they diverge?
Do they conflict?
Rawls’ first principles cover basic liberties, but three questions:
1. Can distributively unjust laws be legitimate, and does the state have a right to
make us comply?
2. Must laws be democratically forged to be legitimate?
3. How does democracy confer legitimacy on distributive or political decisions?
Legitimate Authority
If an authority is legitimate, one must have reasons for complying independent of the
content of its decisions.
e.g. You are the jailer of a convict that you know to be innocent. A mistake has
been made. Should you accept the legitimacy of the procedure that enforced that
decision?
e.g. A judge has authority to pass judgement, legitimised by the law he represents.
Legitimate authority means objectively justified authority, not just authority perceived to
be justified by its subjects. Legitimate authorities make mistakes, but their decisions still
have legitimacy and authority. e.g. A student can appeal against exam marks on
procedural grounds, but cannot question the judgement of the examiner. Should
we comply with unjust laws if they proceed from legitimate procedures? It seems
plausible that decision-making processes can confer legitimacy on decisions made. But
even if legitimacy is not present, there may be other reasons to comply with them.
Wrong but legitimate: Can we legitimately make ‘mistakes’ when it comes to distributive
justice, and should we rectify any errors once we identify them? If we claim that our views
are better than others’, we must claim there is such a thing as right and wrong (or at least
better and worse). But accepting the absolute legitimacy of the law entails the positivist
view that “right” and “wrong” are there to discover and not socially constructed.
Right but illegitimate: Can an authority pass a judgement that I see as correct (outcome-
based), but without legitimacy? Can perceived mistakes (or perceived mistakes) in the
judicial system undermine legitimacy? In the long run it is argued that persistently ‘false’
legitimacy will be exposed and that obviously unjust legitimate bodies will not last (is this
empirically verified?).
Les avantages d'acheter des résumés chez Stuvia:
Qualité garantie par les avis des clients
Les clients de Stuvia ont évalués plus de 700 000 résumés. C'est comme ça que vous savez que vous achetez les meilleurs documents.
L’achat facile et rapide
Vous pouvez payer rapidement avec iDeal, carte de crédit ou Stuvia-crédit pour les résumés. Il n'y a pas d'adhésion nécessaire.
Focus sur l’essentiel
Vos camarades écrivent eux-mêmes les notes d’étude, c’est pourquoi les documents sont toujours fiables et à jour. Cela garantit que vous arrivez rapidement au coeur du matériel.
Foire aux questions
Qu'est-ce que j'obtiens en achetant ce document ?
Vous obtenez un PDF, disponible immédiatement après votre achat. Le document acheté est accessible à tout moment, n'importe où et indéfiniment via votre profil.
Garantie de remboursement : comment ça marche ?
Notre garantie de satisfaction garantit que vous trouverez toujours un document d'étude qui vous convient. Vous remplissez un formulaire et notre équipe du service client s'occupe du reste.
Auprès de qui est-ce que j'achète ce résumé ?
Stuvia est une place de marché. Alors, vous n'achetez donc pas ce document chez nous, mais auprès du vendeur aclark32. Stuvia facilite les paiements au vendeur.
Est-ce que j'aurai un abonnement?
Non, vous n'achetez ce résumé que pour €4,33. Vous n'êtes lié à rien après votre achat.
