Garantie de satisfaction à 100% Disponible immédiatement après paiement En ligne et en PDF Tu n'es attaché à rien
logo-home
M1 €6,60
Ajouter au panier

Dissertation

M1

3 revues
 3 fois vendu
  • Cours
  • Établissement

This is my Unit 2 M1 work which I had completed in the year 2015/ 2016, it is a well detailed and thorough piece of work which has been marked and passed by my teacher Enjoy!!

Aperçu 1 sur 5  pages

  • 23 juin 2016
  • 5
  • 2015/2016
  • Dissertation
  • Inconnu
  • Merit

3  revues

review-writer-avatar

Par: stardustfals • 5 année de cela

review-writer-avatar

Par: sgctang1 • 6 année de cela

review-writer-avatar

Par: Zhuojunzhang • 6 année de cela

avatar-seller
Bushra Khanom M1


Laws made by parliament (Act of Parliament)

Laws in this case can be made very quickly as long as the government is supporting the law
making. An example of this includes the Election Act 2001 where it was postponed due to
the foot and mouth disease which had effected a lot of people, this is why it had only taken
8 days to gain royal assent. Altering a law can be completed very quickly for the parliament
to be doing it, an example of this is that it only took 2 weeks for the parliament to go
through the statutory instrument with the act of Dangerous Dogs Act as the parliament
wanted to add two other types of breed of dogs into the list of banned dogs, but when this
came into act the statutory act was into force. However, laws made by judges is time
consuming as the laws would need to go through the whole court hierarchies. But on the
other hand not every type of law is made very quickly by the parliament, this is because
they would have to go through every single legislative stages a bill had to go through and
this could take up to a year or more of doing so that it is able to become an act of
parliament. Whereas, as the royal is a stage, a stage cannot argue, this is why other
individuals would argue, but this type of law making is funded by the public itself through
the form of tax payers, this is so that the problem is shared. This shows that laws are made
quicker in the parliament rather than with judges as the parliament would only need
support the law whereas judges have a longer process to go through to make new laws.

MP’s do not need to have any sort of legal qualification an example in this case is Louise
Mensch, who was an author before she had become an MP, but now she has retired.
Individuals who wish to be an MP need to be over the age of 18 and a British citizen or a
citizen who is a part of a commonwealth county or in the republic of Ireland. Applicants
must be selected by 10 members of the parliamentary electors on whom they wish to join
with, this is so that they are able to reassure that only hardworking candidates can stand.
But a price of £500 is required when anyone submits a nominated paper. But on the other
hand a judge would need to go through a long process as they would have to practice as a
solicitor or a barrister for at least 10 years before they can become a judge, this shows that
being part of a parliament is quicker than being judge.

The background of any MP’s are mainly middle aged white males, but these statistics show
that out of 650 MP’s only a small percentage of 23% of them are females, which is 148. This
shows that the background of an MP is similar to the background of a judge. Also only 27 of
them have a BME background which is 4%. The youngest MP is 29 but the average age of an
MP is 50.

Bills are firstly introduced to the Parliament; this is before any sorts of draft laws. There is
regular discussion and consultations being held with any parties who are interested in this,
parties include any professional bodies or pressure groups and also any sorts of voluntary
organisations. The different types of people that Michael Gove comments from are
individuals who want to reform their maths and English GCSE’s, or who were head teachers,
local authorities, employer of the business sector, subject associations such as awarding

Les avantages d'acheter des résumés chez Stuvia:

Qualité garantie par les avis des clients

Qualité garantie par les avis des clients

Les clients de Stuvia ont évalués plus de 700 000 résumés. C'est comme ça que vous savez que vous achetez les meilleurs documents.

L’achat facile et rapide

L’achat facile et rapide

Vous pouvez payer rapidement avec iDeal, carte de crédit ou Stuvia-crédit pour les résumés. Il n'y a pas d'adhésion nécessaire.

Focus sur l’essentiel

Focus sur l’essentiel

Vos camarades écrivent eux-mêmes les notes d’étude, c’est pourquoi les documents sont toujours fiables et à jour. Cela garantit que vous arrivez rapidement au coeur du matériel.

Foire aux questions

Qu'est-ce que j'obtiens en achetant ce document ?

Vous obtenez un PDF, disponible immédiatement après votre achat. Le document acheté est accessible à tout moment, n'importe où et indéfiniment via votre profil.

Garantie de remboursement : comment ça marche ?

Notre garantie de satisfaction garantit que vous trouverez toujours un document d'étude qui vous convient. Vous remplissez un formulaire et notre équipe du service client s'occupe du reste.

Auprès de qui est-ce que j'achète ce résumé ?

Stuvia est une place de marché. Alors, vous n'achetez donc pas ce document chez nous, mais auprès du vendeur bushra123. Stuvia facilite les paiements au vendeur.

Est-ce que j'aurai un abonnement?

Non, vous n'achetez ce résumé que pour €6,60. Vous n'êtes lié à rien après votre achat.

Peut-on faire confiance à Stuvia ?

4.6 étoiles sur Google & Trustpilot (+1000 avis)

71872 résumés ont été vendus ces 30 derniers jours

Fondée en 2010, la référence pour acheter des résumés depuis déjà 15 ans

Commencez à vendre!

Récemment vu par vous


€6,60  3x  vendu
  • (3)
Ajouter au panier
Ajouté