Garantie de satisfaction à 100% Disponible immédiatement après paiement En ligne et en PDF Tu n'es attaché à rien
logo-home
PHI2043 (Business Ethics) Notes €6,46   Ajouter au panier

Notes de cours

PHI2043 (Business Ethics) Notes

1 vérifier
 531 vues  12 fois vendu
  • Cours
  • Établissement
  • Book

This is a complete and comprehensive summary of all content covered in PHI2043 (Business Ethics) lectures from week 1 to week 11 of the course. The notes are really helpful for keeping up during the semester, tutorial/forum contributions, essay writing and test/exam preparation. The author achieved...

[Montrer plus]

Aperçu 2 sur 28  pages

  • 8 mars 2023
  • 28
  • 2022/2023
  • Notes de cours
  • Gabriele james
  • Toutes les classes

1  vérifier

review-writer-avatar

Par: juliacarolinewilliams9 • 1 année de cela

avatar-seller
Business Ethics Notes
Gabriele James


Week 1: Lecture 2

• Ethics is the study of morality, right/wrong, or the code of conduct of a group.
• Moral standards = Moral norms/right actions derived from moral principles regarding
harm, freedom, equality, justice, etc.
• Immoral/unethical = An act which is morally wrong/falls short of a moral standard. The
act is ethically impermissible.
• Amoral = An act to which no moral standards apply (primarily self-regarding, possibly
prescriptive language). The act is morally permissible.
• Amoral issues may appear to be moral issues due to strong emotions.
• Moral/ethical = An act which is morally right/meets a moral standard. The act is morally
permissible and morally required (not doing it is impermissible).
• Supererogatory = An act which exceeds a moral standard. The act is morally permissible,
but not morally required (you are not obliged to perform them, seen as heroic).
• Descriptive claims = Describe how things are.
• Normative claims = Prescribe what ought to be the case.
• Some normative questions have obvious answers. Even when answers are difficult to
find, it doesn’t mean they don’t exist (therefore, normative moral facts do exist).
• Moral facts = Moral/ethical claims that are true. They are objective (even when facts are
harder to find, their nature does not change).


Week 1: Lecture 3

• Emotivism/boo-hurrah theory:
- Ethical claims are merely expressions of emotion (how we feel guides our moral
choices, people disagree about grey areas). Thus, normative moral facts do not exist.
- The implication that there are no moral facts is difficult to accept when it comes to
obvious moral standards (e.g., murder is wrong).
- It is inconsistent to hold that emotivism is only true of grey areas.
• Moral relativism:
- Normative moral facts exist. What makes these facts true or false is whether a group
believes them or not (the truth of moral claims is relative to a community).
- Moral facts are subjective.
- Promotes tolerance (you can be open-minded about the cultural practices of others).
- Acts that most would agree are immoral cannot be considered universally ethically
impermissible, as long as some group of people believe the act to be permissible
(thus, there are no universal moral facts).
- Espouses that facts are established by mere belief.
- Provides no practical guidance when groups within a society have conflicting views.

, • Doctrine of divine command:
- Normative moral facts are determined by the will of god.
- Moral facts are subjective.
- The dilemma is that we don’t know whether morality is willed by god because it is
moral, or whether it is moral because it is willed by god.
- If god’s will were different, then moral standards would be different.
- If there are some things we can’t imagine god willing, it suggests that morality is
independent of god’s will.
- Rejecting divine command theory doesn’t refute god’s omnipotence (it has limits).
• The best tool to discover moral facts is critical thinking.
• We can’t be ethical by simply following the law, because the law can require/permit
immoral acts, and the law requires interpretation.
• Even if religion is not a source of moral truths, it may be a good place starting point to
seek ethical guidance. We should apply critical thinking where religious advice must be
interpreted to apply to a specific moral dilemma.
• Following your gut/intuition may not always push you in the right direction, as it is
influenced by various irrelevant factors (e.g., mood, experiences), and does not give us
access to reasons for our actions.


Week 2: Lecture 1

• Critical thinking = The ability to apply the methods of logical reasoning/argumentation.
• Scepticism = Consideration of the value of conventional ideas; a dedication to only
accepting answers that are supported by sound arguments.
• Logical reasoning = Giving good reasons to accept our arguments.
• Structure of an argument:
- Conclusion (the claim you are giving reasons in support of).
- Premise/s (the reasons you are giving to support your argument).
- We formalise arguments to see the relationship between the conclusion and
premise/s, and to find where the problem lies before refuting an argument.
• Valid argument = If the provided premise/s are true, the truth of the conclusion is
guaranteed (conclusion follows from premise/s, or premise/s entail conclusion).
• Valid arguments can be absurd (if the premise/s are not, in fact, true).
• Deductive argument = Making an inference based on widely-accepted facts/premises.
Guarantee that the conclusion is true if the premises are true.
• Validity of deductive arguments:
- A = B. B = C. Therefore, A = C.
- If A, then B. A. Therefore, B (modus ponens).
• Sound argument = Valid arguments with true premises.
• Proving arguments to be unsound/testing for soundness:
- Show that the argument is invalid.
- Show that the premise/s are not necessarily true.

Les avantages d'acheter des résumés chez Stuvia:

Qualité garantie par les avis des clients

Qualité garantie par les avis des clients

Les clients de Stuvia ont évalués plus de 700 000 résumés. C'est comme ça que vous savez que vous achetez les meilleurs documents.

L’achat facile et rapide

L’achat facile et rapide

Vous pouvez payer rapidement avec iDeal, carte de crédit ou Stuvia-crédit pour les résumés. Il n'y a pas d'adhésion nécessaire.

Focus sur l’essentiel

Focus sur l’essentiel

Vos camarades écrivent eux-mêmes les notes d’étude, c’est pourquoi les documents sont toujours fiables et à jour. Cela garantit que vous arrivez rapidement au coeur du matériel.

Foire aux questions

Qu'est-ce que j'obtiens en achetant ce document ?

Vous obtenez un PDF, disponible immédiatement après votre achat. Le document acheté est accessible à tout moment, n'importe où et indéfiniment via votre profil.

Garantie de remboursement : comment ça marche ?

Notre garantie de satisfaction garantit que vous trouverez toujours un document d'étude qui vous convient. Vous remplissez un formulaire et notre équipe du service client s'occupe du reste.

Auprès de qui est-ce que j'achète ce résumé ?

Stuvia est une place de marché. Alors, vous n'achetez donc pas ce document chez nous, mais auprès du vendeur stuviasisters. Stuvia facilite les paiements au vendeur.

Est-ce que j'aurai un abonnement?

Non, vous n'achetez ce résumé que pour €6,46. Vous n'êtes lié à rien après votre achat.

Peut-on faire confiance à Stuvia ?

4.6 étoiles sur Google & Trustpilot (+1000 avis)

85443 résumés ont été vendus ces 30 derniers jours

Fondée en 2010, la référence pour acheter des résumés depuis déjà 14 ans

Commencez à vendre!
€6,46  12x  vendu
  • (1)
  Ajouter