Garantie de satisfaction à 100% Disponible immédiatement après paiement En ligne et en PDF Tu n'es attaché à rien
logo-home
samenvatting EIJHAS (geslaagd 1ste zit 16/20) €15,49
Ajouter au panier

Resume

samenvatting EIJHAS (geslaagd 1ste zit 16/20)

3 revues
 275 vues  18 fois vendu

samenvatting european and international justice and home affairs (volledig)

Aperçu 4 sur 158  pages

  • 11 mai 2023
  • 158
  • 2022/2023
  • Resume
Tous les documents sur ce sujet (4)

3  revues

review-writer-avatar

Par: alessiatack • 8 mois de cela

review-writer-avatar

Par: caitlinvm • 10 mois de cela

review-writer-avatar

Par: monaverbruggen • 1 année de cela

avatar-seller
marietourlousse
EUROPEAN AND INTERNATIONAL
JUSTICE HOME AFFAIRS
SCHENGEN

 Schengen, a village at the point where Luxembourg borders France and Germany
= birthplace of the partnership (Schengen agreement) between the Benelux countries,
France and Germany
 The Schengen acquis has been integrated into the European union

1. ORIGIN AND HISTORICAL DEVELOPMENT


1.1. CONTEXT
 Even though the systematic custom controls on goods at the borders between EC
(=European Community) member states had been lifted, the control on persons had not
been lifted
 Free movement of persons as an EC notion did not imply the lifting of control on persons at
the borders, on the contrary
 Free movement for EC citizens required EC citizenship to be documented at the border

 Because this resulted in long waiting time at the French-German border, there was an
agreement signed in 1984 in Saarbrucken, to abolish the controls on persons at their
border.

 In doing so, France and Germany in fact followed the early example of the Benelux
countries, which had already lifted systematic controls at their internal borders
 As a result, the five countries signed the so-called Schengen Agreement in 1985, in
which they agreed to the gradual abolition of internal border controls for persons at all
their common borders

 The Schengen Implementation Convention (= SIC) was signed in 1990




1

,1.2. AIMS

1.2.1. LIFTING INTERNAL BORDER CONTROLS FOR PERSONS
 The Schengen Implementation Convention (SIC) established a free movement of persons,
lifting controls at the internal borders, whereas the controls at the external borders of the
Schengen states were reinforced

 To implement the lifting of internal borders, a distinction needed to be made between
two types of ‘movement’
1.) Intra-Schengen movement = movement within the Schengen area
 Border control for persons no longer existed for them
2.) External border movement = movement in and out the Schengen area
 Those controls were reinforced for them

 From then on, airports needed to distinguish ‘intra-Schengen travelers’, who are not subject
to controls and ‘other travelers’, who are subject to controls

1.2.2. FLANKING MEASURES
 To support the policy regulating the entry of persons into the Schengen area, several
flanking measures were introduced to make it work in practice

CARRIERS LIABILITY

 Anyone bringing third-country nationals into the Schengen area is liable for the repatriation
costs should it turn out that these persons do not possess the required travel and residence
documents
 It has been picked up at the level of the European Union, where it was further developed
and complemented with a system of fines

OBLIGATION TO REGISTER

 Providers of accommodation were obliged to register the name, citizenship and ID number
of all guests
 These registration cards must be available to the competent authorities in order to
support them in their duties to prevent danger




2

,HANDLING ASYLUM APPLICATIONS & EURODAC

 The Schengen Implementing Convention (SIC) established a mechanism to determine a
single state competent (1 land bevoegd maken) to deal with an asylum application
submitted in any of the Schengen states.
 The lead principle: to put the responsibility for handling asylum applications with the so-
called country of first entry and to allow other states, confronted with the application of an
asylum seeker who had first entered the Schengen area elsewhere, to return the asylum
seeker concerned to that state of first entry

De verantwoordelijkheid voor het behandelen van asielaanvragen ligt bij het land waar de
asielzoeker eerst binnenkwam in de Schengen-zone  elk ander land dat geconfronteerd wordt met
de aanvraag van een asielzoeker die eerst een ander land van de Schengen-zone binnenkwam, mag
die persoon terugsturen naar dat eerste land


 Only by the end of 2000, the EU has taken steps to make the above system more proof
(meer waterdicht) by adopting the Eurodac Regulation, which has taken effect in 2003

 From then onwards, Member States were given access to Eurodac, an EU-wide database
where they needed to store the fingerprints of asylum applicants and which
automatically compares newly stored fingerprints with already stored fingerprints
 This made it possible to avoid asylum fraud under a fake identity

 A recast Eurodac regulation has been proposed in 2016, aiming to radically widen the scope
of Eurodac to a database in which Member States will also store and check fingerprint data
of thirdcountry nationals or stateless persons who are not applicants for international
protection and have irregularly crossed the external border or are found to be staying
irregularly in the EU

SCHENGEN VISA FOR SHORT STAY & VIS

 The information exchange regarding visa applications had to be improved
 Given the possibility for citizens to move freely within the Schengen area, a common
understanding with respect for 2 criteria had to be established

1) Common criteria based on which non-Schengen nationals would be either allowed or
refused entry into the Schengen area had to be agreed upon
2) The Schengen countries had to establish uniform visa criteria for foreigners, i.e.
thirdcountry nationals or non-EC nationals, who remain in the Schengen area for less
than three months

 In order to facilitate information exchange, the Visa Information System (VIS) was
developed
 It allows Schengen countries to exchange visa information and check if someone
presenting himself at the external border of the Schengen area possesses a valid visa to
enter


3

, OPERATIONAL POLICE AND JUDICIAL COOPERATION

 The SIC prioritized an improved cooperation between police and judicial authorities to
compensate for the removal of internal borders and respond to the possibility for criminals
to actively abuse their right to move freely in the Schengen area
 Crossborder observation and pursuit was regulated, and provisions regarding the use of
firearms and ammunition were introduced

Beter samenwerking om de opheffing van de binnengrenzen te compenseren & de mogelijkheid voor
criminelen om hun recht op vrij verkeer te misbruiken, aanpakken

INFORMATION EXCHANGE VIA SIS

 Information exchange was improved through the introduction of the so-called Schengen
information system (SIS) allowing competent authorities, predominantly in the context of
their tasks to monitor the Schengen external border and to issue alerts in their national part
of the SIS (NSIS)  the alerts relate to:
 Foreigners who should be denied access to the Schengen area

 Persons for whom a provisional arrest is warranted with a view to subsequent
extradition

 Missing minors

 Persons intelligence services considering a threat to national security

 Stolen vehicles or money

 Besides inserting their own alerts, competent authorities can also consult alerts entered by
counterparts from other states
 This caused technical hurdles, the development of a second-generation SIS (SIS II) was
necessary
 The SIS II was supplemented with a mechanism to exchange bilaterally additional
information that can be required to validate alerts
 To facilitate this kind of exchange, so-called SIRENE bureaus (supplementary
information request at the national entry) were installed in each Schengen
country
 Furthermore, an important corpus of data protection rules was elaborated




4

Les avantages d'acheter des résumés chez Stuvia:

Qualité garantie par les avis des clients

Qualité garantie par les avis des clients

Les clients de Stuvia ont évalués plus de 700 000 résumés. C'est comme ça que vous savez que vous achetez les meilleurs documents.

L’achat facile et rapide

L’achat facile et rapide

Vous pouvez payer rapidement avec iDeal, carte de crédit ou Stuvia-crédit pour les résumés. Il n'y a pas d'adhésion nécessaire.

Focus sur l’essentiel

Focus sur l’essentiel

Vos camarades écrivent eux-mêmes les notes d’étude, c’est pourquoi les documents sont toujours fiables et à jour. Cela garantit que vous arrivez rapidement au coeur du matériel.

Foire aux questions

Qu'est-ce que j'obtiens en achetant ce document ?

Vous obtenez un PDF, disponible immédiatement après votre achat. Le document acheté est accessible à tout moment, n'importe où et indéfiniment via votre profil.

Garantie de remboursement : comment ça marche ?

Notre garantie de satisfaction garantit que vous trouverez toujours un document d'étude qui vous convient. Vous remplissez un formulaire et notre équipe du service client s'occupe du reste.

Auprès de qui est-ce que j'achète ce résumé ?

Stuvia est une place de marché. Alors, vous n'achetez donc pas ce document chez nous, mais auprès du vendeur marietourlousse. Stuvia facilite les paiements au vendeur.

Est-ce que j'aurai un abonnement?

Non, vous n'achetez ce résumé que pour €15,49. Vous n'êtes lié à rien après votre achat.

Peut-on faire confiance à Stuvia ?

4.6 étoiles sur Google & Trustpilot (+1000 avis)

52355 résumés ont été vendus ces 30 derniers jours

Fondée en 2010, la référence pour acheter des résumés depuis déjà 14 ans

Commencez à vendre!
€15,49  18x  vendu
  • (3)
Ajouter au panier
Ajouté