Garantie de satisfaction à 100% Disponible immédiatement après paiement En ligne et en PDF Tu n'es attaché à rien
logo-home
Recherché précédemment par vous
Recherché précédemment par vous
logo
Complete CS3003 Software Engineering Assessment/Coursework (PASS) €25,85
Ajouter au panier
Accédez rapidement à
Aperçu
  2.  
  3. Brunel University (BU)
  4.  
  5. Software Engineering (CS3003)

Dissertation

Complete CS3003 Software Engineering Assessment/Coursework (PASS)
 0 fois vendu
  • Cours
  • Software Engineering (CS3003)
  • Établissement
  • Brunel University (BU)

Complete CS3003 Software Engineering Threshold Assessment/Coursework in which I received a passing grade. The document contains the coursework brief, followed by the answers, containing diagrams and referencing.

Aperçu 2 sur 13  pages

Infos sur le Document

  • 14 mai 2023
  • 13
  • 2020/2021
  • Dissertation
  • Inconnu
  • A+

Sujets

  • software engineering
  • brunel cs3003
  • cs3003
  • brunel software engineering

École, étude et sujet

  • Brunel University (BU)
  • Inconnu
  • Software Engineering (CS3003)
Tous les documents sur ce sujet (1)

Vendeur

avatar-seller
BrunelCompSci

Aperçu du contenu

Department of Computer Science

CS3003 Software Engineering
Assessment/Coursework for 2020/21


TABLE OF CONTENTS
Main Objective of the assessment…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………1
Description of the Assessment………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………1
Learning Outcomes and Marking Criteria………………………………………………………………………………………………………2
Format of the Assessment…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….2
Submission Instructions………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………..3
Avoiding Plagiarism………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………3
Late Coursework…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………..3


Assessment Title Assessing Quality of Code from a Metric Perspective
Module Leader Steve Counsell
Distribution Date Tuesday 3rd November 2020
Submission Deadline Monday 14th December 2020
Feedback by Wednesday 23rd December 2020
Contribution to overall module assessment Pass/Fail (Threshold assessment)
Indicative student time working on assessment 60 hours
2,000 words (this does not include the cover page,
Word or Page Limit (if applicable)
contents page, figures, plots, graphs or references)

Assessment Type (individual or group) Individual


MAIN OBJECTIVE OF THE ASSESSMENT
In this assessment, you will be analysing some metrics in relation to how they reflect quality an open-source
system and preparing a report on the results of your analysis. The aim of your report will be to discuss whether,
based on your analysis, aspects of the systems show good or poor quality. You will choose data from a system
and you will write a report based on your findings.

Note: Use Excel (or any equivalent statistical tool of your choice) to analyse the data in your system.

DESCRIPTION OF THE ASSESSMENT
1. Select all the rows of a system of your choice from the large dataset called “coursework_data.xlsx”
provided in the CS3003 assessment folder. The system name is in column A of the dataset. Store those
rows in a separate dataset so that you can begin your analysis of them.
2. Next, as well as BUGS (in column N) choose an additional **FOUR** metrics from the dataset columns
that you believe will help explore this system. These metrics start in column D in the dataset. You
should recognise these metrics from the lab sheets that you have been working on. So, in total you’ll
have 5 metrics to work with.
3. Now, analyse the data in your chosen system. Explore, the relationship between BUGS and each of the
other four metrics you chose and discuss the relationships you find. Produce any charts and graphs
(e.g. bar charts, box plots and/or scatter plots, etc.) showing the features of each relationship.
4. You should also use other statistics (i.e., correlation) to identify any major differences in the data (see
the previous lab sheets for what you’ve done in this way already). Try to understand any differences
and similarities and explain why you think these differences may exist. Is there anything noteworthy
(unusual, interesting or surprising) resulting from your analysis? You will need to document all your
findings in your report.




Updated October 2020
1 of 3

, Department of Computer Science

LEARNING OUTCOMES AND MARKING CRITERIA

Learning outcomes for the assessment Assessment and marking criteria

LO1: Describe the attributes of quality software and Provide evidence of a systematic understanding of
the implications of poorly designed software. software quality and the use of metrics to assess
this (throughout the sections of the report).

LO2: Describe and evaluate the processes and Provide evidence of a systematic understanding of
techniques which may be used to produce quality the processes and techniques used to produce
software and be able to create software artifacts quality software (throughout the sections of the
which display these attributes. report).

LO3: Critically evaluate, select and appraise software Demonstrate the ability to select and assess suitable
metrics in order to assess software process and metrics (throughout the sections of the report).
product attributes.

An overall pass or fail will be awarded for the report you submit. A pass or fail will be awarded for each section
of your report. All sections must be passed to pass the assessment overall. This coursework document contains
various indications on what differentiates a basic attempt from a good attempt. Although you can pass this
coursework with a basic attempt, a more comfortable pass can be achieved by going further and being more
ambitious. Although a ‘good’ attempt will not attract any more marks for this coursework, it is worth
remembering that there may well be questions based on this assessment in an end of year exam question.
Those going beyond a basic attempt at this coursework are likely to be able to gain higher marks in response to
that exam question.

FORMAT OF THE ASSESSMENT
You must produce a report containing the following sections. All reports must provide an accurate word count
at the beginning of the document.

**Please number and add a title to each section in your report so that every section is clear**.

Section 1: This section relates to point 2 on the previous page. All well as BUGS, state which other FOUR metrics
you chose. Why are these four metrics important? Provide any references you think are relevant to the
discussion to back-up your argument in the references section (Section 3 described below).

<<Approximately 350 words>>

Section 2: Analysis and Discussion of results: This section relates to points 3 and 4 on the previous page. Provide
graphs/charts/plots/correlations etc. summarising what your analysis of the relationship between BUGS and
the other four metrics has shown. Provide a discussion of each of your findings; this discussion should highlight
important features of your results and comment on what those results mean. **Each graph/chart provided by
you should be numbered and given a caption (e.g., Figure 1. BUGS versus CBO) so that it can be referred to
in the report and understood by the marking team**.

<<Please note that figures/graphs/charts are not included in your word count>>

<<Approximately 1650 words>>

Section 3: Provide a list of references of source material you have referred to in your coursework (15 references
maximum).

<<References are not included in your word count>>




Updated October 2020
2 of 3

Les avantages d'acheter des résumés chez Stuvia:

Qualité garantie par les avis des clients

Qualité garantie par les avis des clients

Les clients de Stuvia ont évalués plus de 700 000 résumés. C'est comme ça que vous savez que vous achetez les meilleurs documents.

L’achat facile et rapide

L’achat facile et rapide

Vous pouvez payer rapidement avec iDeal, carte de crédit ou Stuvia-crédit pour les résumés. Il n'y a pas d'adhésion nécessaire.

Focus sur l’essentiel

Focus sur l’essentiel

Vos camarades écrivent eux-mêmes les notes d’étude, c’est pourquoi les documents sont toujours fiables et à jour. Cela garantit que vous arrivez rapidement au coeur du matériel.

Foire aux questions

Qu'est-ce que j'obtiens en achetant ce document ?

Vous obtenez un PDF, disponible immédiatement après votre achat. Le document acheté est accessible à tout moment, n'importe où et indéfiniment via votre profil.

Garantie de remboursement : comment ça marche ?

Notre garantie de satisfaction garantit que vous trouverez toujours un document d'étude qui vous convient. Vous remplissez un formulaire et notre équipe du service client s'occupe du reste.

Auprès de qui est-ce que j'achète ce résumé ?

Stuvia est une place de marché. Alors, vous n'achetez donc pas ce document chez nous, mais auprès du vendeur BrunelCompSci. Stuvia facilite les paiements au vendeur.

Est-ce que j'aurai un abonnement?

Non, vous n'achetez ce résumé que pour €25,85. Vous n'êtes lié à rien après votre achat.

Peut-on faire confiance à Stuvia ?

4.6 étoiles sur Google & Trustpilot (+1000 avis)

70713 résumés ont été vendus ces 30 derniers jours

Fondée en 2010, la référence pour acheter des résumés depuis déjà 15 ans

Commencez à vendre!

Récemment vu par vous

Examen ·

(2)

TPF2602 Assignment 50 PORTFOLIO 2024 (758456) - DUE 28 August 2024

Examen ·

(0)

Travels of a T-Shirt questions - revised - All Answers are Correct

Dissertation ·

(0)

Unit 22: Market Research Assignment 2 Market research in Action

Dissertation ·

(0)

Annotatie Inkomstenbelasting Juridisch Academische Vaardigheden

Examen ·

(0)

Vituity Scribe Final Exam, Vituity Test with Complete Solutions

Resume ·

(0)

NR509 Mid-Term Study Guide Questions And Answers | Latest Update

Examen ·

(0)

MATH 114N Kittle Week 8 Final Exam complete verified solutions

Dissertation ·

(0)

2022 Distinction : Unit 9 - Team Building in Business Assignment 1

Examen ·

(10)

ENG1501 Assignment 2 (COMPLETE ANSWERS) 2024 (371427) - 11 June 2024

€25,85
  • (0)
Ajouter au panier
Ajouté