Garantie de satisfaction à 100% Disponible immédiatement après paiement En ligne et en PDF Tu n'es attaché à rien
logo-home
Using the evidence discussed in the module, provide an argument supporting an INTERACTIVE view of the human brain and mind. €6,77   Ajouter au panier

Examen

Using the evidence discussed in the module, provide an argument supporting an INTERACTIVE view of the human brain and mind.

3 revues
 220 vues  18 fois vendu
  • Cours
  • Établissement

This module comprises the following three lecture blocks: 1. Modularity and Embodied Cognition (Larry) 2. Concepts and Cognitive Processes (Andriy) 3. Neuropsychology and Neuroscience (Leigh) This assignment requires you to write a single essay with the main goal of demonstrating your ability ...

[Montrer plus]

Aperçu 2 sur 13  pages

  • 6 septembre 2023
  • 13
  • 2021/2022
  • Examen
  • Questions et réponses
  • Inconnu

3  revues

review-writer-avatar

Par: amberkhogg18 • 10 mois de cela

review-writer-avatar

Par: ayahassanibrahim3 • 10 mois de cela

review-writer-avatar

Par: elliestewart180 • 10 mois de cela

avatar-seller
Neuropsychology and Cognitive Science




Student number – 19010309

Word count – 3,418

, Within psychological research it has been suggested that an interactive view of the human brain and
mind is the most successful and efficient in perceiving various theories and behaviours. This is an
area of current research because as technologies develop, we are building the argument for an
interactive view through new methods such as fMRI and EEG imaging. This review will consider both
the modular and interactive view by focussing on the theoretical, behavioural, and neuroanatomical
concepts within each topic. The review will first discuss this debate by fixating on modularity and
embodied cognition, number cognition and sentence processing, and hemisphere lateralisation and
emotions. The goal of this essay is to collect relevant theories of modularity and disprove these to
provide an argument in support of the interactive view. As well as discussing interactive theories and
the evidence which supports them. Throughout history and early research there has been the
controversial debate that the modular view was seen to be more accurate. However, through the
more recent brain imaging techniques, the interactive view has accomplished fulfilling the gaps in
which the modular view could not. Overall, this essay looks at what these gaps are and provides
substantial evidence to support the interactive view of the human brain and mind.


Firstly, to look at the whole argument of the interactive view it is important to consider the
contrasting theoretical perspectives to achieve a complete outlook. Chomsky first developed the
idea of modularity from the basis of universal grammar, which suggests there are dedicated organs
or processes for all specific tasks that humans carry out. This is further supported by Fodor’s
modularity thesis (Fodor, 1983), he states that modules have four properties: domain-specific,
innate, fast and automatic, and encapsulated. Evidence which can support this theory is found by
considering domain-specific systems, this suggests if a system is truly domain specific then an
impairment should only affect the domain in which it operates (Zerilli, 2019). Therefore, this theory
predicts that the brain consists of specialised circuits of which can be damaged without impacting
the performance of other circuits (Kiverstein, 2020). However, there are various studies which
disprove this theory by suggesting that brain areas which served one sensorimotor function can be
rewired for language if it has been in an environment rich with language.
Therefore, to look at a contrasting theory, it is implicit we look at the concept of embodied
cognition. This consists of the contemporary view that there is an inseparable link between body,
mind, and environment, in which they all interact together. The beginnings of embodied cognition
in the 1980s was determined by work conducted in phenomenology, theoretical biology, cognitive
psychology, and cognitive linguistics (Kosmas & Zaphiris, 2018). These early concepts suggested that
the psychical actions we preform, and the actions being performed around us, shape our mental
experience (Niedenthal, 2007). Within the literature, embodied cognition is supported by numerous

Les avantages d'acheter des résumés chez Stuvia:

Qualité garantie par les avis des clients

Qualité garantie par les avis des clients

Les clients de Stuvia ont évalués plus de 700 000 résumés. C'est comme ça que vous savez que vous achetez les meilleurs documents.

L’achat facile et rapide

L’achat facile et rapide

Vous pouvez payer rapidement avec iDeal, carte de crédit ou Stuvia-crédit pour les résumés. Il n'y a pas d'adhésion nécessaire.

Focus sur l’essentiel

Focus sur l’essentiel

Vos camarades écrivent eux-mêmes les notes d’étude, c’est pourquoi les documents sont toujours fiables et à jour. Cela garantit que vous arrivez rapidement au coeur du matériel.

Foire aux questions

Qu'est-ce que j'obtiens en achetant ce document ?

Vous obtenez un PDF, disponible immédiatement après votre achat. Le document acheté est accessible à tout moment, n'importe où et indéfiniment via votre profil.

Garantie de remboursement : comment ça marche ?

Notre garantie de satisfaction garantit que vous trouverez toujours un document d'étude qui vous convient. Vous remplissez un formulaire et notre équipe du service client s'occupe du reste.

Auprès de qui est-ce que j'achète ce résumé ?

Stuvia est une place de marché. Alors, vous n'achetez donc pas ce document chez nous, mais auprès du vendeur hannahnewton21. Stuvia facilite les paiements au vendeur.

Est-ce que j'aurai un abonnement?

Non, vous n'achetez ce résumé que pour €6,77. Vous n'êtes lié à rien après votre achat.

Peut-on faire confiance à Stuvia ?

4.6 étoiles sur Google & Trustpilot (+1000 avis)

67096 résumés ont été vendus ces 30 derniers jours

Fondée en 2010, la référence pour acheter des résumés depuis déjà 14 ans

Commencez à vendre!

Récemment vu par vous


€6,77  18x  vendu
  • (3)
  Ajouter