Garantie de satisfaction à 100% Disponible immédiatement après paiement En ligne et en PDF Tu n'es attaché à rien
logo-home
samenvatting political rhetoric €8,99
Ajouter au panier

Resume

samenvatting political rhetoric

 25 vues  0 fois vendu

Samenvatting Political Rhetoric , Professor Julie Sevenans Samenvatting van de slides + notities genomen tijdens de les (Engels)

Aperçu 4 sur 68  pages

  • 6 janvier 2024
  • 68
  • 2023/2024
  • Resume
Tous les documents sur ce sujet (5)
avatar-seller
jolienjanssens2
Political Rhetoric 2023-2024 Jolien Janssens



Political Rhetoric
Lecture 1: Introduction (02/10/2023)
The importance of political rhetoric
 No politics without persuasion
 Reason: uncertainty
 Persuasion by speech vs. persuasion by force
o Persuasion is “a symbolic process in which communicators try to convince other people
to change their own attitudes or behaviors regarding an issue through the transmission
of a message in an atmosphere of free choice” (Perloff, 2020, p. 24)
 Accepting and believing the message
o ”Democracy . . . is distinguished as a form of governance by the extent of persuasion
relative to coercion” (Mutz, Sniderman & Brody, 1996)
 More powerful than persuasion by force
 Verbally convincing
 The fundamental political skill?
o = persuasion, art of persuasion/convincing someone

What is rhetoric?
 Greek ‘retoriketekhne’
o Rhetor = speaker
o Tekhne = art
o = art of speaking
 Persuading others through speech
 Studying rhetoric = learning the practical skills of persuasion
 Studying rhetoric = studying the persuasiveness of speech
 Not limited to spoken word (oratory)
o Written word
o Visuals
 Facial expressions, way you behave …

Political rhetoric
 Many areas of rhetorical studies
o E.g. law, organization studies, marketing,…
o Court is the place were rhetoric matters
 Persuasion in the political realm
 Not limited to politicians!
o Steven van Gucht : scientist
o Sinéad O’Connor : singer-songwriter, activist as a singer, statement against abuse in the
catholic church
o Emma Watson : gender rights
o Red Devils : colored shirts to support gay movement
o Journalists Fox News

,Political Rhetoric 2023-2024 Jolien Janssens


 “What makes a political speech persuasive (or not)?”

Warm-up exercise
 “Most famous persuasive speech in history”
 Martin Luther King – I have a dream
o Activist leader of civil rights movement
o August 1963
o March on Washington for Jobs and Freedom
 Better right for black people
o 100 years after Emancipation Proclamation (Lincoln)
 “Five score years ago, a great American, in whose symbolic shadow we stand
today, signed the Emancipation Proclamation.”
 Score years = 20 years
o Video with subtitles: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_yOBncaiito
o Transcript: https://www.npr.org/2010/01/18/122701268/i-have-a-dream-speech-in-its-
entirety
 Task:
1. Do you find the speech persuasive?
2. Write down as many elements as possible which you think make the speech persuasive.

o rhetorical figures; repetitions, metaphors…
o symbolic meaning
o he talks about his four children, this makes him in the position to make his claim
o references to children are emotional
o way he speaks, almost seems to sing is, like rhymes
o he pauses, doesn’t go fast, message can resonate a bit before he goes on
o patriotic, links up with Americans in general, doesn’t want to distinguish himself, but he
tries to link up with broader American values
o positive feelings more dominant in the speech than the negative
o symbolic place, whole atmosphere
o addresses all different parts of the audience

 Possible elements:
o Credibility as a person
 Who he is
 Displaying eloquence, expertise, reason
 Doesn’t want things to get violent
o Arousal of emotion (metaphors)
o Convincing arguments
o Use of rhetorical devices
 E.g. repetitions
 E.g. allusions
 E.g. rhyme
 How he speaks

,Political Rhetoric 2023-2024 Jolien Janssens


 …

 “We must forever conduct our struggle on the high plane of dignity and discipline. We must not
allow our creative protest to degenerate into physical violence.”
 No, no, we are not satisfied, and we will not be satisfied until justice rolls down like waters, and
righteousness like a mighty stream.
o Emotion
 We can never be satisfied as long as our bodies, heavy with the fatigue of travel, cannot gain
lodging in the motels of the highways and the hotels of the cities.

A diverse research field?
 Different backgrounds, different questions
o Linguistics (e.g. rhetorical figures)
o Psychology (e.g. emotions vs. the cognitive)
o Political science (e.g. questions of power)
o Communication science (e.g. mass media)
 Each with their own terminology & research methods
 Difficulty: they don’t always talk to each other
 This course: eclectic approach

Is rhetoric a bad/dangerous thing?
Rhetoric, a contested notion
 Words often associated with rhetoric: “mere”; “empty”
o Rhetoric is contrasted with reality
 Reality does not match with thoughts of big companies
 Association with danger
o Can people be persuaded of anything? (violence, misinformation)
 Negative connotation
 At the same time: no democracy without free speech?
o Basic of free speech, debate is the very foundation of democracy

Rhetoric was central to ancient democracy
 Greece, 500 BC
 From aristocracy to democracy
o Demos = people
o Ekklesia = assembly
o All the people involved
 Highly participatory system
o Status of being citizen comes with obligations
 Rhetorical skills were important
o Mostly oral
 Teachers: sophists
o Sophos = wisdom
o E.g. Gorgias, Protagoras
 Culture of oral transmission

, Political Rhetoric 2023-2024 Jolien Janssens


 Different views of classical thinkers

Plato
 Rhetoric is empty and dangerous
o Can do bad instead of good (death of his mentor Socrates)
 Socrates zette jongeren aan tot nadenken en hiervoor is hij tot dood
veroordeeld, dus Plato (zijn leerling) geen voorstander meer en zegt dat dit
gevaarlijk kan zijn
o It can persuade most people of anything; a ‘rudderless boat’; “sophistries”
 If you don’t know the truth, than rhetoric can be used to convince anyone of
anything, even things that are not true at all
 Belief in one moral “truth”
o Allegory of the cave
 There is one moral truth, but not many people can see it, only few smart people
are capable to go out of the cave
o Only a small elite can see it
 “The Republic”
o Society should be based on reason
o Strict division: philosopher-kings; guardians and traders
 Ideas were later criticized (e.g. Popper)
o Only few people can see the truth… ??
 More sympathetic reading: argument for alternative type of rhetoric (dialectic)
o Cf. technocracy today
o Together looking for the truth instead of convincing each other

Aristotle
 Student of Plato
 More positive reading of rhetoric
o Man is a ‘political animal’
 We can communicate, decide together, we live in a community
o ‘Good life’ is life in accordance with community (vs. Plato: natural state)
 Rhetoric complements philosophical reasoning
o How should the best case be put, given the argument, evidence, audience?
o Best case is not always clear
 “The art of rhetoric”
o Different figures of speech
 Disclaimer: exclusive notion of ‘citizen’
o Cf. importance of ‘enthymeme’ (vs. syllogism)
 Cut steps of the argument, because your public is already convinced partly =
enthymeme
o Degree of permitted disagreement is limited
o Slaves couldn’t argument

Cicero
 Great orator of the Roman world

Les avantages d'acheter des résumés chez Stuvia:

Qualité garantie par les avis des clients

Qualité garantie par les avis des clients

Les clients de Stuvia ont évalués plus de 700 000 résumés. C'est comme ça que vous savez que vous achetez les meilleurs documents.

L’achat facile et rapide

L’achat facile et rapide

Vous pouvez payer rapidement avec iDeal, carte de crédit ou Stuvia-crédit pour les résumés. Il n'y a pas d'adhésion nécessaire.

Focus sur l’essentiel

Focus sur l’essentiel

Vos camarades écrivent eux-mêmes les notes d’étude, c’est pourquoi les documents sont toujours fiables et à jour. Cela garantit que vous arrivez rapidement au coeur du matériel.

Foire aux questions

Qu'est-ce que j'obtiens en achetant ce document ?

Vous obtenez un PDF, disponible immédiatement après votre achat. Le document acheté est accessible à tout moment, n'importe où et indéfiniment via votre profil.

Garantie de remboursement : comment ça marche ?

Notre garantie de satisfaction garantit que vous trouverez toujours un document d'étude qui vous convient. Vous remplissez un formulaire et notre équipe du service client s'occupe du reste.

Auprès de qui est-ce que j'achète ce résumé ?

Stuvia est une place de marché. Alors, vous n'achetez donc pas ce document chez nous, mais auprès du vendeur jolienjanssens2. Stuvia facilite les paiements au vendeur.

Est-ce que j'aurai un abonnement?

Non, vous n'achetez ce résumé que pour €8,99. Vous n'êtes lié à rien après votre achat.

Peut-on faire confiance à Stuvia ?

4.6 étoiles sur Google & Trustpilot (+1000 avis)

56326 résumés ont été vendus ces 30 derniers jours

Fondée en 2010, la référence pour acheter des résumés depuis déjà 14 ans

Commencez à vendre!
€8,99
  • (0)
Ajouter au panier
Ajouté