This is a summary of all the course material (incl. lectures and all articles) written in the year 2022/2023.
Using this summary only, I passed with a high grade on the first try. However, the summary might not be up to date with your own course content, as I do not have information about poten...
Literature lecture 1
Brown and Singh
Forensic risk assessment – attempt to predict the likelihood of future offending in order to
identify individuals in need of intervention, the likelihood of future antisocial behavior
Dangerousness – a high probability of inflicting imminent physical harm
Risk vs Protective factors (increase VS decrease the likelihood of antisocial behavior)
- Static factors – historical or unchanging
- Acutely dynamic – modifiable and likely to change
- Stably dynamic factors – modifiable but unlikely to change
Identifying risk and protective factors – Grann and Langstrom – the empirical method
(factors identified through experiments), the theoretical method (some theory used), the
clinical method (individual characteristics)
Contemporary approaches to forensic risk assessment
- Unstructured clinical judgment (UCJ) – subjective evaluation, it is flexible,
inexpensive, but poor reliability and validity – seminal monograph by Monahan
(Clinical Prediction of Violent Behavior)
- Actuarial assessment – structured instruments, composed of risk and protective
factors, which are either static or dynamic and related to the adverse event – each
item is weighted in – we get a total score, we cannot apply group-based recidivism to
individual clients
o VRAG-R – 12 item instrument, static factors, 7 domains
o Static-99R – 10 item, static risk, four domains
o LS/CMI – 43 item, static and dynamic factors
- Structured professional judgment (SPJ) – due to the inflexibility of actuarial
schemes, factors associated according to theory, more accurate
o HCR-20 – 20 item, static and dynamic, three domains
o SVR-2- same, sexually violent predator hearings
o START – 20 item, dynamic risk, protective factors
Tarasoff v Regents of the UC – obligation to use protective care against the victim of a client
- mental health professionals have a duty to protect those individuals whom their patients
threaten with bodily harm
No single risk assessment tool is more accurate than others
,Lecture 1
➢Probability calculation that a harmful behavior or event will occur, and involves an
assessment about the frequency of the behavior (or event), its likely impact and who it will
affect” (Kemshall, 1996)
➢“The attempt to predict the likelihood of future offending in order to identify individuals
in need of intervention” (Brown & Singh, 2014)
Risk management – interventions to manage the risk or to reduce the risk
Why is risk management important – safety, public interest, ethical importance,
therapeutical importance (RNR model), communication
History
- 1876 – Lombroso – criminals have certain physical characteristics
- Burgess – 1928 – first risk assessment tool – risk of re-offense of offenders being
released from the Illinois prison system, actuarial
o Marital status, criminal and employment history, institutional misconduct
o Calculations based on analyses of data for 3k individuals paroled in Chicago,
76% high risk status recidivated within 5 years
- Baxstrom v Herold – 1966 – dangerous patients vs those released into society,
followed up by Steadman Cocozza (1978) – after 4 years of follow-up 2.7% sent back
to psychiatric hospital
- In the 70s 80s it is NOT proved that professionals can predict future violence
- Expertise of the expert – similar between teachers and psychiatrists, more info –
more conservative judgment – only accurate in 1 out of 3 cases – 80s
- 90s - Martien Philipse – TBS – innovative – no predictors suggested by the clinicians
were predictive, also no link between the clinical assessment of relapse risk and
actual recidivism
RNR
- Evidence based practice – based on scientific research into effectiveness of those
interventions
- Risk principle – higher risk benefit from
more intensive treatment, who to
treat, matching level of risk with level of
treatment – risk of recidivism is central,
increased risk of recidivism if wrong
level of intensity
- Need – only factors associated with a
reduction should be addressed in
treatment, what to treat – criminogenic
needs – factors that lead to crime
, - Responsivity – tailored to offenders characteristics, motivation, circumstances,
learning style
Criminogenic needs
1. History of antisocial behavior (static) – risk – early and ongoing involvement in
antisocial acts, work on alternative behavior
2. Antisocial personality pattern – thrill seeking, aggression,- problem solving skills,
self-management skills, anger management, coping
3. Antisocial cognitions – attitudes, values, beliefs – reducing them, recognizing them
4. Antisocial peers – close contacts with criminal others – reducing them, building
contacts with non-criminals
5. Family/marital relationships – education, care, control, supervision – reduce
conflict, improve control, build positive relationships
6. School/job – low achievement, low satisfaction – improving performance, rewards,
satisfaction
7. Prosocial recreational activities – low engagement and satisfaction in non-criminal
leisure activities, improving engagement, rewards and satisfaction
8. Substance abuse – reduction of it, having support
Non-criminogenic needs
- Less research done, not proven
- Self-esteem, emotional problems, psych. Disorder, health
Literature lecture 2
De Vries Robbe, Willis
Positive psychology – optimism and achieving happiness
Protective factors – internal resilience factors, community integration factors, treatment
related factors, social factors, environmental factors
Important for youth violence, sexual offending
GLM – protective factors as prosocial means or strategies t achieve one or more primary
human goods – common life goals
- Offending less desirable when addressing causal factors and finding prosocial
alternatives
Implementing GLM in clinical practice
Structured methods of risk assessment>>>>>unstructured
Unipolar factors -opposing ends to a risk continuum
, SAPROF – Structured Assessment of Protective Factors for violence risk
- Unipolar
- 17 protective factors
- Three scales
- Sexual violence risk, or medium-term risk-focused tools for violence risk
SAPROF-YV
- For juveniles and young adults
- 16 factors in four scales (resilience, motivational, relational and external).
Desistence for Adolescents who Sexually Harm
Balanced approach to risk assessment
- Over-prediction of risk – can create pessimism among therapists
Personal guidelines to building skills and resources
Treatment motivation and treatment-alliance
Evaluation of treatment progress
Assessment results and risk management: the importance of context
Lecture 2
Predictive validity
- Area Under the Curve (AUC) – receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis, to
classify future recidivist vs non-recidivist, 1 is perfect discrimination .56 small, .64
moderate, .71 strong – risk scores and outcome – retrospective measure – chance
that a random recidivist gets a higher score than a random non-recidivist – sensitivity
and specificity, no cut-off needed
non
- NPV – negative predictive value – the proportion of offenders who were assessed as
low risk, and later did not reoffend
Les avantages d'acheter des résumés chez Stuvia:
Qualité garantie par les avis des clients
Les clients de Stuvia ont évalués plus de 700 000 résumés. C'est comme ça que vous savez que vous achetez les meilleurs documents.
L’achat facile et rapide
Vous pouvez payer rapidement avec iDeal, carte de crédit ou Stuvia-crédit pour les résumés. Il n'y a pas d'adhésion nécessaire.
Focus sur l’essentiel
Vos camarades écrivent eux-mêmes les notes d’étude, c’est pourquoi les documents sont toujours fiables et à jour. Cela garantit que vous arrivez rapidement au coeur du matériel.
Foire aux questions
Qu'est-ce que j'obtiens en achetant ce document ?
Vous obtenez un PDF, disponible immédiatement après votre achat. Le document acheté est accessible à tout moment, n'importe où et indéfiniment via votre profil.
Garantie de remboursement : comment ça marche ?
Notre garantie de satisfaction garantit que vous trouverez toujours un document d'étude qui vous convient. Vous remplissez un formulaire et notre équipe du service client s'occupe du reste.
Auprès de qui est-ce que j'achète ce résumé ?
Stuvia est une place de marché. Alors, vous n'achetez donc pas ce document chez nous, mais auprès du vendeur solutiont. Stuvia facilite les paiements au vendeur.
Est-ce que j'aurai un abonnement?
Non, vous n'achetez ce résumé que pour €7,55. Vous n'êtes lié à rien après votre achat.
