Garantie de satisfaction à 100% Disponible immédiatement après paiement En ligne et en PDF Tu n'es attaché à rien
logo-home
Public Law - Ombudsman revision notes (semester 2) €3,67   Ajouter au panier

Examen

Public Law - Ombudsman revision notes (semester 2)

 10 vues  0 achat
  • Cours
  • Établissement

Documents containing all the relevant information about the topic, condensed into colour coded tables to enable easier memorisation and order. I achieved a first class in public law using these notes.

Aperçu 2 sur 6  pages

  • 14 janvier 2024
  • 6
  • 2022/2023
  • Examen
  • Questions et réponses
  • Inconnu
avatar-seller
Non-legal redress: the ombudsman


NON-LEGAL REDRESS – THE OMBUDSMAN

WHAT IS AN A person appointed to hear and investigate complaints
OMBUDSMAN??? and give those complaints a dedicated institutional
outlook

Parliamentary Commissioner Act 1967
(1) For the purpose of conducting investigations in
accordance with the following provisions of this
Act there shall be appointed a Commissioner, to be
known as the Parliamentary Commissioner for
Administration

BACKGROUND OF THE Judicial review was inaccessible and narrow and political
OMBUDSMAN mechanisms were limited too

The motivation for the creation of the ombudsman was
the ‘continuous flow of relatively minor complaints, not
sufficient in themselves to attract public interest but
nevertheless of great importance to individuals’ (JUSTICE
para 76)

 Created in response to demand for redress as
there was a ‘gap’ that the government couldn’t fill
 Doesn’t fully capture reality as the issue can be
extremely serious but still fit into this ‘gap’

ACCESS TO THE COST – free!!!
OMBUDSMAN  Access to administrative justice is free compared
to legal justice being extremely expensive

SOCIAL FACTORS: AWARENESS AND WILLINGNESS
The Ombudsman in 2012 said that people felt making was
a complaint was ‘difficult or felt it didn’t make a
difference’

This could be reasons such as:
 Difficult to find out where/how as you cannot
invoke the ombudsman directly through a website
or anything
 Fear of worse service – may make people resent
you and get a worse service
 Doubts about effectiveness/authenticity – very
often to assume that complaints procedures don’t
do anything, and they are just there so people can
complain so it looks like the state are doing
something about redress

, Non-legal redress: the ombudsman


THE ’MP FILTER’
PCA 1967 section 5 explains how the ombudsman sits
behind the MP filter which is the idea that if you want to
invoke the ombudsman you can just directly ask them,
you have ask/invoke an MP first
 The law says that ‘any MP’ will do however
conventions say that you have to use your own
constituency MP

The political background reason for the MP filter is that
the ombudsman is complementary to parliamentary
accountability procedures
 Organised as an agent of parliament rather than a
stand-alone body so parliament remains at the
centre
 This was meant to be a temporary transitional
agreement for 5 years and then after this the
ombudsman would be able to be directly invoked
but Gordon said that the MP filter (even though it
is highly contested and disliked) became
‘imbedded within the system’

THE JURISTICION OF THE Schedule 2 contains the list of bodies that the
OMBUDSMAN ombudsman can investigate which is similar to the judicial
review concept of amenability

Schedule 3 contains the list of excluded matters which is
only a small exclusions and the standard complaints will
normally not include these exclusions

Section 5 of the PCA gives the statutory terms which
define the power of the ombudsman –
MALADMINISTRATION AND INJUSTICE

MALADMINISTRATION Crossman attempted to define maladministration as ‘bias,
neglect, inattention, delay, incompetence, inaptitude,
perversity, turpitude, arbitrariness and so on.’

The ombudsman established a list of what should be done
correctly and if these are not done then there is
maladministration:
 Getting it right
 Being customer focused
 Being open and accountable
 Acting fairly and proportionately
 Putting things right
 Seeking continuous improvement

Les avantages d'acheter des résumés chez Stuvia:

Qualité garantie par les avis des clients

Qualité garantie par les avis des clients

Les clients de Stuvia ont évalués plus de 700 000 résumés. C'est comme ça que vous savez que vous achetez les meilleurs documents.

L’achat facile et rapide

L’achat facile et rapide

Vous pouvez payer rapidement avec iDeal, carte de crédit ou Stuvia-crédit pour les résumés. Il n'y a pas d'adhésion nécessaire.

Focus sur l’essentiel

Focus sur l’essentiel

Vos camarades écrivent eux-mêmes les notes d’étude, c’est pourquoi les documents sont toujours fiables et à jour. Cela garantit que vous arrivez rapidement au coeur du matériel.

Foire aux questions

Qu'est-ce que j'obtiens en achetant ce document ?

Vous obtenez un PDF, disponible immédiatement après votre achat. Le document acheté est accessible à tout moment, n'importe où et indéfiniment via votre profil.

Garantie de remboursement : comment ça marche ?

Notre garantie de satisfaction garantit que vous trouverez toujours un document d'étude qui vous convient. Vous remplissez un formulaire et notre équipe du service client s'occupe du reste.

Auprès de qui est-ce que j'achète ce résumé ?

Stuvia est une place de marché. Alors, vous n'achetez donc pas ce document chez nous, mais auprès du vendeur miaalunt. Stuvia facilite les paiements au vendeur.

Est-ce que j'aurai un abonnement?

Non, vous n'achetez ce résumé que pour €3,67. Vous n'êtes lié à rien après votre achat.

Peut-on faire confiance à Stuvia ?

4.6 étoiles sur Google & Trustpilot (+1000 avis)

73314 résumés ont été vendus ces 30 derniers jours

Fondée en 2010, la référence pour acheter des résumés depuis déjà 14 ans

Commencez à vendre!
€3,67
  • (0)
  Ajouter