Examen
Solutions Manual for Accounting for Decision Making and Control 9th Edition By Jerold L. Zimmerman
- Cours
- Établissement
Solutions Manual for Accounting for Decision Making and Control 9th Edition By Jerold L. Zimmerman
[Montrer plus]
Vendeur
S'abonner
WhiteHouseTutor
Avis reçus
Aperçu du contenu
Accounting for Decision Making and Control, 9e Jerold L. ZimmermanL L L L L L L L L
(Solutions Manual All Chapters, 100% Original Verified, A+ Grade)
L L L L L L L L L
SOLUTIONS TO PROBLEMS AND CASES L L L L
CHAPTER 1 L
INTRODUCTION
P 1–1:
L Solution to MBA Students (10 minutes) L L L L L
[Using accounting information for decision making and control]
L L L L L L L
Together the two observations highlight the extremes in the trade-offs of using L L L L L L L L L L L
Laccounting information for decision and control. In the first case, there is more analysis
L L L L L L L L L L L L L
Lof opportunity costs that are hard to capture with typical accounting information. In the
L L L L L L L L L L L L L
Lsecond case, there is less intended interest in opportunity cost and greater emphasis on
L L L L L L L L L L L L L
Lcontrol.
P 1–2:
L Solution to One Cost System Isn't Enough (15 minutes) L L L L L L L L
[Economic Darwinism]
L L
The first part of the quote describes the tension (and conflict) that arises when a
L L L L L L L L L L L L L L
Lsingle accounting system is used for multiple purposes. This part of the statement is an
L L L L L L L L L L L L L L
Laccurate description of practice. However, the quote has a couple of problems, including:
L L L L L L L L L L L L
•While the quote describes the costs of using a single system ("a single system ...
L L L L L L L L L L L L L L
Lcan't perform important managerial functions adequately"), the quote does not describe
L L L L L L L L L L
Lthe benefits derived from using a single system (lower bookkeeping costs, a single audit,
L L L L L L L L L L L L L
Lless confusion).
L
•Because the quote ignores the benefits of a single system, it ignores the concept of
L L L L L L L L L L L L L L
Leconomic Darwinism. It does not address the question of how surviving (successful)
L L L L L L L L L L L
Lcompanies can compete if a single system "can't perform important managerial functions
L L L L L L L L L L L
Ladequately."
•Also, the quote assumes that managers are bound to their internal accounting
L L L L L L L L L L L
Lsystems, that no other alternative information sources are available. Often managers
L L L L L L L L L L
Ldevelop their own ad hoc, "off-line" information systems for decision making. These
L L L L L L L L L L L
Lsystems include spreadsheets, informal observation, and "walking around."
L L L L L L L
P 1–3:
L Solution to U.S. and Japanese Tax Laws (15 minutes) L L L L L L L L
[Influence of conflicting demands on cost systems]
L L L L L L L
The internal accounting system supports multiple uses, including financial
L L L L L L L L
reporting, taxes, contracting (debt and management compensation), internal decision
L L L L L L L L L
making, and internal control. Because multiple purposes are served, trade-offs must be
L L L L L L L L L L L L
made among the competing demands. When more emphasis is placed on one purpose
L L L L L L L L L L L L L
(taxes), less consideration can be given to other uses (internal decision
L L L L L L L L L L L
Lmaking and L
,control). By linking taxes to external reporting, Japanese firms’ financial reports will be
L L L L L L L L L L L L
Lbased on accounting procedures that give more weight to tax considerations. In the U.S.,
L L L L L L L L L L L L L
Lcompanies can keep two sets of books, one for taxes and the other for financial reporting.
L L L L L L L L L L L L L L L
LThus, in the U.S., there is more of a decoupling of taxes and everything else. Except for
L L L L L L L L L L L L L L L L
Lthe additional bookkeeping costs of producing the two separate sets of reports, tax
L L L L L L L L L L L L
considerations are predicted to have less influence on the choice of internal (and thus
L L L L L L L L L L L L L L
Lexternal) accounting procedures in the U.S. than in Japan.
L L L L L L L L
The question is raised as to why firms use the same accounting procedures for
L L L L L L L L L L L L L
Linternal reports as they do for external reports. Or for that matter, why do tax laws and
L L L L L L L L L L L L L L L L
Lexternal financial reporting considerations have any effect on internal accounting
L L L L L L L L L
Lprocedures? Why don’t firms maintain multiple sets of accounts, one for each purpose
L L L L L L L L L L L L
L(e.g., financial reporting, internal decision making, and internal control)? Clearly there
L L L L L L L L L L
Lare additional bookkeeping costs for maintaining multiple sets of accounts. But also,
L L L L L L L L L L L
Lthere are confusion costs and, in many instances, firms explicitly link senior executive
L L L L L L L L L L L L
Lcompensation to externally reported financial statements. Such explicit linkage of
L L L L L L L L L
Lexecutive pay to externally reported net income presumably exists to control agency costs
L L L L L L L L L L L L
between management and shareholders. Once senior management performance and
L L L L L L L L L
rewards are linked to external reports, the internal reporting system will become linked to
L L L L L L L L L L L L L L
the external reports and basically less consideration will be given to choosing accounting
L L L L L L L L L L L L L
Lprocedures that aid in internal decision making and internal control.
L L L L L L L L L
In Japan, the firm’s accounting systems are less likely to be used for internal uses
L L L L L L L L L L L L L L
L(decision making and control) than in the U.S. Because they cannot rely as much on their
L L L L L L L L L L L L L L L
accounting systems for internal uses (because more weight is placed on using accounting
L L L L L L L L L L L L L
Lprocedures to reduce taxes), Japanese managers are more likely to use non-accounting-
L L L L L L L L L L L
Lbased systems for internal decision making and control.
L L L L L L L
P 1-4:
L Solution to Using Accounting for Planning (15 minutes) L L L L L L L
[Usefulness of historical costs]
L L L L
a. Historical costs are of limited use in making planning decisions in a rapidly
L L L L L L L L L L L L
changing environment. With changing products, processes and prices, the
L L L L L L L L L
historical costs are inadequate approximations of the opportunity costs of using
L L L L L L L L L L L
resources.
L
Historical costs may, however, be useful for control purposes, as they L L L L L L L L L L
provide information about the activities of managers and can be used as
L L L L L L L L L L L L
performance measures to evaluate managers.
L L L L L
b. The purpose of accounting systems is to provide information for planning
L L L L L L L L L L
purposes and control. Although historical costs are not generally appropriate for
L L L L L L L L L L L
planning purposes, additional measures are costly to make. An accounting system
L L L L L L L L L L L
should include additional measures if the benefits of improved decision making are
L L L L L L L L L L L L
greater than the costs of the additional information.
L L L L L L L L
,P 1–5:
L Solution to Budgeting (15 minutes) L L L L
[Trade-off between decision making and control] L L L L L
In this firm, the bonus is based on meeting the budget. Two incentives
L L L L L L L L L L L L
L exist: sales people will under-forecast future sales and they have little incentive to sell
L L L L L L L L L L L L L
Lmore than the budget.
L L L
This firm tries to use the budget for two functions: decision making and control.
L L L L L L L L L L L L L
LIn deciding on next year’s production plans, sales peoples’ forecasts of future sales are
L L L L L L L L L L L L L
Limportant. However, these same forecasts (after revision by supervisors) are used as part
L L L L L L L L L L L L
Lof the compensation scheme to motivate the sales people to achieve their goals. By using
L L L L L L L L L L L L L L
the budget (forecasts) as part of the control system, the firm gives up some of the
L L L L L L L L L L L L L L L L
Lbudget’s usefulness as a decision making tool to set production plans. While senior
L L L L L L L L L L L L
Lmanagers might recognize that the sales people’s forecasts are low, they don’t know
L L L L L L L L L L L L
Lexactly how low. This introduces more uncertainty into planning for next year’s
L L L L L L L L L L L
Lproduction.
P 1-6:
L Solution to Golf Specialties (20 minutes) L L L L L
[Average versus variable cost of an incremental order] L L L L L L L
a. Given that the variable cost per head cover is 1.10 euros, the fixed cost per
L L L L L L L L L L L L L L
weekis:
L L
AC = FC / Q + VCL L L L L L
3.10 = FC/600 + 1.10 L L L L 3.50 = FC/500 + 1.10 L L L L
FC = 1,200 euros
L L L FC = 1,200 euros L L L
b. The change in total cost if the 100 unit Kojo offer is accepted is:
L L L L L L L L L L L L L
600 × 3.10 euros – 500 × 3.50 euros = 110 euros
L L L L L L L L L L L L
Or, each head cover has variable cost of 1.10 euro. Since Kojo is willing to pay 2
L L L L L L L L L L L L L L L L
euros per head cover or 200 euros for 100 covers, by accepting this order GS
L L L L L L L L L L L L L L L
makes 90 euros a week. Therefore, GS should accept Kojo’s offer if these are all
L L L L L L L L L L L L L L L
the relevant facts.
L L L
c. GS should consider the following non-quantitative factors:
L L L L L L
• What prevents Kojo from reselling the head covers back to dealers in L L L L L L L L L L L
Europe at prices below GS’s current price of 4.25 euros?
L L L L L L L L L L
• If GS sells the head covers to Kojo at 2 euros, what prevents GS’s
L L L L L L L L L L L L L
European customers from learning of this special deal and demand similar
L L L L L L L L L L L
price concessions. In other words, why do we expect to be able to
L L L L L L L L L L L L L
implement this price discrimination strategy?
L L L L L
, • Will Kojo purchase other GS products and import them to Japan?
L L L L L L L L L L
• What is Kojo’s credit worthiness and will they pay for the head covers
L L L L L L L L L L L L
upon taking delivery? L L
P 1–7:
L Solution to Parkview Hospital (25 minutes) L L L L L
[Changes in the environment cause accounting system changes] L L L L L L L
a. Parkview’s accounting system was probably adequate 10 years ago. It faced little
L L L L L L L L L L L
competition and had little incentive to have detailed cost and revenue data at the
L L L L L L L L L L L L L L
clinical levels.
L L
b. With increased pressure to reduce costs, Parkview management wants detailed cost
L L L L L L L L L L
and revenue data at the clinic level to help identify units with excess revenues or
L L L L L L L L L L L L L L L
deficits. This would help guide their decisions as to how to respond to the $3.2
L L L L L L L L L L L L L L L
million shortfall. The accounting system doesn’t provide as much help as
L L L L L L L L L L L
management would like.
L L L
c. The question of changing the accounting system should be approached as a cost-
L L L L L L L L L L L L
benefit decision. What will such changes cost, how long will they take to
L L L L L L L L L L L L L
implement, and what benefits are derived?
L L L L L L
While it is tempting to say more accurate tracking of costs and benefits
L L L L L L L L L L L L
allows better decision making, changing the accounting system, including all the
L L L L L L L L L L L
data processing changes that are likely necessary, usually is a very costly and time
L L L L L L L L L L L L L L
consuming process. Often special studies based on approximations of clinical
L L L L L L L L L L
department costs and revenues might prove to be faster and cheaper than waiting
L L L L L L L L L L L L L
to revamp the accounting system.
L L L L L
Notice the change in competition in the health insurance market caused by
L L L L L L L L L L L
Trans Insurance’s entry prompted a series of changes in Parkview, including a re-
L L L L L L L L L L L L L
examination of its accounting system.
L L L L L
P 1–8:
L Solution to Montana Pen (25 minutes) L L L L L
[Incremental cost of outsourcing]
L L L L
a. The average cost information given in the problem does not tell us what 400 clips
L L L L L L L L L L L L L L
cost. Like in the Vortec example from the chapter, the incremental cost of the 400
L LLL L L L L L L L L L L L L L
clips must be estimated from the following:
L L L L L L L
Changein total cost B185 1200 − B212.5 800 L
L L L L L L L L
= B130/clip
= LL
L
L
Changein volume L L 1,200−800
L L
At the current volume of 1,200 clips, the total cost is B222,000 (B185 ×
L L L L L L L L L L L L L
1,200).If 400 clips are outsourced, reducing in-house volume to 800, the total cost
L L L L L L L L L L L L L L
falls toB170,000 (B212.5 × 800). Hence, total cost falls B52,000 (B222,000
L L L L L L L L L L L L
Les avantages d'acheter des résumés chez Stuvia:
Qualité garantie par les avis des clients
Les clients de Stuvia ont évalués plus de 700 000 résumés. C'est comme ça que vous savez que vous achetez les meilleurs documents.
L’achat facile et rapide
Vous pouvez payer rapidement avec iDeal, carte de crédit ou Stuvia-crédit pour les résumés. Il n'y a pas d'adhésion nécessaire.
Focus sur l’essentiel
Vos camarades écrivent eux-mêmes les notes d’étude, c’est pourquoi les documents sont toujours fiables et à jour. Cela garantit que vous arrivez rapidement au coeur du matériel.
Foire aux questions
Qu'est-ce que j'obtiens en achetant ce document ?
Vous obtenez un PDF, disponible immédiatement après votre achat. Le document acheté est accessible à tout moment, n'importe où et indéfiniment via votre profil.
Garantie de remboursement : comment ça marche ?
Notre garantie de satisfaction garantit que vous trouverez toujours un document d'étude qui vous convient. Vous remplissez un formulaire et notre équipe du service client s'occupe du reste.
Auprès de qui est-ce que j'achète ce résumé ?
Stuvia est une place de marché. Alors, vous n'achetez donc pas ce document chez nous, mais auprès du vendeur WhiteHouseTutor. Stuvia facilite les paiements au vendeur.
Est-ce que j'aurai un abonnement?
Non, vous n'achetez ce résumé que pour €18,04. Vous n'êtes lié à rien après votre achat.
Peut-on faire confiance à Stuvia ?
4.6 étoiles sur Google & Trustpilot (+1000 avis)
80467 résumés ont été vendus ces 30 derniers jours
Fondée en 2010, la référence pour acheter des résumés depuis déjà 14 ans