Resume
Decision making in marketing lecture summary including exam hints
- Cours
- Établissement
Summary of decision making in marketing lectures including exam hints and examples
[Montrer plus]
1 vérifier
Par: Mathias • 1 année de cela
Vendeur
S'abonner
ilsefesten
Avis reçus
Aperçu du contenu
Decision making in marketingLecture 1
Heuristics & Biases
The illusion of decision making: are we in full control?
The default effect:
People in marketing use the default effect to help us, in some sort, to decide.
If a decision is harder (donor), you are more prone to run in a bias (everyone is donor when
born).
The default option is the option the chooser will obtain if he or she does nothing.
bounded rationality: we are constraint in our decision making
o decisions are often complex and difficult
o individuals/ consumers are bounded rational, they have to make decisions under
several constraints: limited knowledge/information, limited resources (time,
attention, memory), limited motivation
Heuristics: cognitive shortcuts to make decisions quickly and efficiently (simplify decisions)
Problem: can lead to systematic errors and biases (e.g. deviations from the true or objective
value, violation of probability laws)
Decoy effect: putting things in context
(newspaper subscription example)
Most famous for doing that: Apple, Iphone (16GB, 32GB etc)
o Choices are made in a context
- relative to other alternatives rather than based on absolute preferences
o Decoy effect: The choice of one option over the other changes when a third –
asymmetrically dominated – option is introduced
asymmetrically dominated = irrelevant alternative
Managerial relevance:
Adding an irrelevant alternative ‘helps’ consumers to decide upselling
Examples: pricing of consumer electronic products (e.g. Apple), restaurant choices
Anchoring: put a number in people’s head, they decide accordingly (example of the redwood
tree)
Anchoring and adjustment = making an estimation based on a process of anchoring on a
salient number and adjusting up or down
Problem: adjustments are typically insufficient, estimation is biased towards the anchor
,Managerial relevance
General: negotiations, price expectations
Specifically: sales techniques (price, product portfolio): furniture, cars, home appliances etc.
Starbucks sets a different anchor (selling experiences instead of selling coffee)
Mental accounting (ice cream example): different pockets matter
Loosing money from different ‘mental accounts’ influences purchase decisions
people keep track of their expenses in different mental accounts (i.e. categories);
these mental accounts influence the decision making process
Managerial & policy relevance:
o Individuals / consumers spend money differently depending on the ‘account’ they
pay from
o Examples: tax refunds, birthday money, investments, bonuses at work, lottery
winnings
Availability heuristics: events are judged more likely to the extent that they are vivid or
easily recalled
Managerial & Policy relevance:
Overestimation of the likelihood that something good or bad will happen
Examples: seeing news, lottery winners, sweepstakes
Representativeness Heuristics: judgement that the probability that object A belongs to class
B depends on the degree to which A resembles B. That is, people rely on characteristics that
are representative for a category when judging likelihoods.
But: if something is more representative, that does not make it more likely
Managerial relevance:
o Misjudgments of likelihood of outcomes based on representative characteristics
o Example: coin toss HTTHHTHT judged more likely than HHHHHHHH
Preferences about framed problems
Winning > Losing
Winning risk averse
Losing risk taking
Framing effect: the frame of a message influences the decision; i.e., people react differently
depending on how a message is presented
Two effects:
1. People prefer positive outcomes over negative outcomes
2. People are risk averse over gains, but risk seeking over loses
Managerial & policy relevance:
Firing vs. saving employees: out of 600, would you father fire 400 or save 200?
Health treatments: would you rather have a 90% chance to live or a 10% chance to die?
,Prospect theory (Tversky & Kahneman, 1979)
Losing causes us much more pain than gaining causes us happiness.
Expected Utility Theory vs. Prospect Theory
Expected Utility Theory
o Utility as a function of absolute wealth
o Marginal utility decreases as wealth increases
Prospect theory
o Reference dependence = value is measured in gains and losses relative to a reference
point
o Diminishing sensitivity = marginal value of gains and losses decreases with their size
o Loss aversion = ‘losses loom larger than gains’
Managerial & Policy relevance
o Loss aversion: potential losses motivate more than potential gains (e.g. purchase,
policy implementation)
o But: Losses make people risk seeking (e.g. financial decision making)
Key takeaways:
1. Decisions are often complex and difficult. To make decisions quickly and efficiently
consumers use several heuristics
2. Heuristics can lead to systematic errors and biases; mistakes people repeat over and
over again (i.e. not always rational but predictably irrational)
3. In decision making, we need to go beyond the standard economical model of
expected utility; prospect theory provides a relevant framework
, 4. Understanding both rational and irrational behavior is important for consumers,
managers and policy makers in financial decision making, HR management, product
pricing, marketing strategy, health policies etc.
Lecture 2
Social influence: we influence others and are influenced by others
Weapons of influence: Techniques to persuade people / consumers
Reciprocity & Door-in-the-Face
Commitment & Foot-in-the-Door
Social proof
Scarcity
Reciprocity: give to receive
Reciprocity:
- based on the social norm to repay what another person has given to us
- across cultures people are taught to live up to this social norm, resulting in distaste for
people how to violate the norm
- Problem: exploitation of the rule as it enforces uninvited debt and can trigger unequal
exchange
Managerial relevance
- Sales techniques: ‘not-so-free samples’ in supermarkets, gifts from sales persons, car tests
over the weekend etc.
- Further examples: dinner invitations, birthday presents, sponsorship
Indirect reciprocity: slamming the door in the face
Rejection-then-retreat
Door-in-the-face technique (DITF)
- getting compliance to a request by starting with a large (or unreasonable) request. If the
large request is rejected, a concession will be offered (i.e. a smaller / reasonable request)
Example:
Group 1: Take a group of young criminals to the zoo for 2 hours
Group 2: (i) Work of 2 years as nonpaid counselor for young criminals or
(ii) take a group of young criminals to the zoo for 2 hours
Managerial & Policy relevance:
- Examples: labor negotiations, sales price, getting friends to move furniture
- Spillover to further request; but do not push it too far
Commitment and Consistency: Stuck with a choice
- After making a commitment, people are more likely to agree with requests in-line
with this commitment
Les avantages d'acheter des résumés chez Stuvia:
Qualité garantie par les avis des clients
Les clients de Stuvia ont évalués plus de 700 000 résumés. C'est comme ça que vous savez que vous achetez les meilleurs documents.
L’achat facile et rapide
Vous pouvez payer rapidement avec iDeal, carte de crédit ou Stuvia-crédit pour les résumés. Il n'y a pas d'adhésion nécessaire.
Focus sur l’essentiel
Vos camarades écrivent eux-mêmes les notes d’étude, c’est pourquoi les documents sont toujours fiables et à jour. Cela garantit que vous arrivez rapidement au coeur du matériel.
Foire aux questions
Qu'est-ce que j'obtiens en achetant ce document ?
Vous obtenez un PDF, disponible immédiatement après votre achat. Le document acheté est accessible à tout moment, n'importe où et indéfiniment via votre profil.
Garantie de remboursement : comment ça marche ?
Notre garantie de satisfaction garantit que vous trouverez toujours un document d'étude qui vous convient. Vous remplissez un formulaire et notre équipe du service client s'occupe du reste.
Auprès de qui est-ce que j'achète ce résumé ?
Stuvia est une place de marché. Alors, vous n'achetez donc pas ce document chez nous, mais auprès du vendeur ilsefesten. Stuvia facilite les paiements au vendeur.
Est-ce que j'aurai un abonnement?
Non, vous n'achetez ce résumé que pour €3,49. Vous n'êtes lié à rien après votre achat.
Peut-on faire confiance à Stuvia ?
4.6 étoiles sur Google & Trustpilot (+1000 avis)
73918 résumés ont été vendus ces 30 derniers jours
Fondée en 2010, la référence pour acheter des résumés depuis déjà 14 ans