Garantie de satisfaction à 100% Disponible immédiatement après paiement En ligne et en PDF Tu n'es attaché à rien
logo-home
samenvatting organisation theory €7,99   Ajouter au panier

Resume

samenvatting organisation theory

 0 vue  0 fois vendu

samenvatting organisation theory voor het 2e jaar TEW aan UGent. Samenvatting van powerpoint en lessen

Aperçu 4 sur 46  pages

  • 24 novembre 2024
  • 46
  • 2023/2024
  • Resume
Tous les documents sur ce sujet (3)
avatar-seller
mauddepermentier
Organization theory
INTRODUCTION
Organisation • = a system of consciously coordinated activities or forces of 2 or more persons

Di8erent levels • Employee à micro
• Group à meso
• Organisation à macro



CHAPTER 1: LOOKING BACK IN HISTORY
è Summary of di,erent schools of thought in organizational & management history
Organisations • Social entities à they have goals and objectives
• Are designed as a system of consciously structured & coordinated activities
• Operate in connectedness with external environment

The rational approach
19th century • Sociologists Karl Marx, Emile Durkheim & Max Weber
Ø Founders of the modern science of sociology
Ø Studied implications of shift from feudalism to capitalism
• Marx à focus on working class
• Durkheim à analysis of what he saw as the loss of solidarity in new society
• Weber à first true organizational sociologist

Context • Turn of 20th century à interesting turning point for organisations
Ø Power, machinery, transportation is booming…

Issues • Large group of people working in same organization
• Increasing pace of industry
• Di8erent working issues

Taylor • Scientific Management
Ø = Scientific approach to management in which all tasks in organisations are
in-depth analysed, routinised, divided & standardized, instead of using
rules-of-thumb
Ø Initiated number of time & motion studies à on the basis of which he carried
out number of experiments to determine methods that would provide most
optimal return within the organisation
Ø Studied the organizational chain from perspective factory worker
Ø Divided tasks into subtasks, measured time needed, eliminated
unnecessary ones à identify the most e8icient method of working (the One
Best Way)
è Introduced as standardized method that all organisation’s workers were
obliged to use

Consequences for • higher return
organisations • standardization of products & activities
• greater control & predicitability
• greater subdivision & more routine tasks à reduced training times
• ‘managers must think, workers only work’ philosophy
• Optimisation of tools & equipment

Resistance to ideas of • Resistance from workers & unions who later came to present them
Taylorism • Ideological standpoint à greater profits by increasing pressure on workforce
• Focus on feirs for ‘deskilling’ à devaluation of human labour
• Human factor
Ø Taylor ignored importance of professional pride & job satisfaction
Ø Ignored significance of forms of reward other than purely financial
Ø Failed to take any account of physical & psychological make)up of
employees required to carry out routine work à led to strain and stress



1

, Taylor was aware of • Resistance of very di8erent kind
certain degree of • Was convinced that workers deliberately worked slower à attempt to ensure
resistance among that his findings would not result in tempo of their work being increased
working population Ø Attributes this to lack of direct supervision
during experiments & • Tasks of forceman (as front-line supervisor) à should be split up into di8erent
tests sub-tasks
Ø Distribution & allocation of tasks to workers
Ø Ensuring quality of execution
Ø Ensuring speed of execution

Solutions • Task enrichment, task enlargement & job rotation

Nowadays • Still criticism against work involving machine-related tempo
Ø People do not tend to work at same constant speed à there are variations
between individuals & within same individual
• Tempo too fast à people lose interest, concentration… => increased sickness
absence…
• Tempo too low à also loss of interest
• People need certain degree of ‘task tension’ in order to be able to function
optimally

Fayol • Management
Ø Kind of management training course
Ø First person to explore the task of ‘management’ as a separate & important
function within organisations
• Functions management
Ø Planning
è Can be regularly reviewed
è Must achieve general objectives
è Long-term & short-term must influence each other
è Flexible & capable of adjustment
è Specific
Ø Organizing
è Involves allocation of materials, resources & personnel
è Strictly ordered hierarchical line, everyone knows what their role is
è All the rules & di8erent levels of authority are clearcly set out in an
organigram
Ø Leading
è Motivating people, rewarding/punishing people, set tasks…
è Leaders must be aware of di8erent capacities of personnel
è Leaders must take action against incompetent member of sta8
Ø Co-ordinating
è Need to co-ordinate tasks of di8erent departments to ensure that the
wider organizational objective is reached
è Regular inter-deparmental meeting
Ø Controlling
è Managing, keeping things under control & within agreed bounds
è Every deviation from agreed objective must be sanctioned

Fayol’s 14 basic principles • Task division
of management • Authority & responsibility
• Discipline
• Centralization
• Equity
• Stability
• Initiative
•…




2

, Di8erences between • Taylor
Taylor & Fayol Ø Managers think, workers work
Ø Employees can have more than 1 leader at the same time
• Fayol
Ø Initiative was important for success
Ø Unity of command à every employee can only have 1 superior

Barnard & Simon • All employees à behave far less rationally than previously assumed
• Claimed that purely rational approach à insu8icient

Barnard • E8ort of individual employees on behalf of the wider objectives of organization
should not be taken for granted (vanzelfsprekend zijn)
Ø Every employee is di8erent & had di8erent visions à might not necessarily
match overall organizational objectives
Ø prime task leader à ensure compatibility between individual needs of
employees & the objectives of the organisation as a whole
• Most important matters of concern for organisation à obtain collaboration for
development of a common objective & communicate these matters clearly
• Specialization à needed to organize the work e8ectively
• Appropriate remuneration à necessary to persuade employees to accept
additional pressure of work
• Authority à necessary but not guaranteed that it will be followed
• Decision-making processes à needed to follow formal lines of organizational
hierarchy (not matter of personal initiative)
Ø Making a decision = making choice between alternative options
Ø Dealing with a problem = deciding to accept only available option that is
acceptable in circumstances

Simon • Organisations distinguish themselves through their
Ø Communication processes
Ø Attention to human relations
Ø Decision-making processes
• ability to motivate people to work hard à crucial factor
Ø Ensuring people can identify with objectives of organisation
Ø Training
Ø Convince rather than coerce people by giving appropriate information &
advice
• Bounded rationality
Ø Sometimes you need to make decisions that are less optimal because they
are limits to people, time pressure….
Ø Psychological, social factors & organisation culture à also play role


The human relation approach
Context • 1930’s à movement developed amongst behavioral scientists in US à for first
time attention on ‘human’ factor in organisations

Elton Mayo • Hawthorne studies
• Four studies with basic principle à giving attention to employees
• The attention that people received had an impact on the productivity
• Rewards had no impact

First phase • Series of tests to see if better working conditions resulted in increased labour
e8iciency à improvement in lighting of spaces
• Productivity improved, but no immediately clear correlation between level of
improvement in lighting & level of improvement in productivity
• Performance could be enhanced by ‘various’ factors, including environmental
ones




3

, Second phase • Group of 6 women put in specially prepared test room
• Introducing more variables à length of working day, number of rest breaks…
• Not possible to find direct connection between particular working conditions &
improvements (even after a year of tests)
• Productivity improvements were result of attention the women received &
through conversations they had with researcher ⟹ informal group feeling
Ø Social processes within group were responsible for improvement

Further test • Now all workers of factory were interviewed
• Employees react to company’s policy & manner in which they were treated by
management
• Clear approval & appreciation for occasions when management pay attention
to results of work

Fourth study • Focus on influence of reward on productivity
• There was no di8erence in forms of leadership for di8erent groups & no contact
with researchers during tests à but research team was aware of existence of
informal groups within formal test groups
• Production norm for group increased ⟹ decrease in productivity for entire
group (even though workers knew they would be rewarded on basis of
individual performance)
Ø Wanted to ‘protect’ weaker members of group à collective solidarity
• Informal group pressure is much stronger than any form of pressure

Hawthorne e8ect • Special attention given to workers in test conditions + fact that results of
performance were being followed with interest by management ⟹ to
improvement of productivity

Psychology on the • Maslow à a theory of social needs
workfloor à revisionism • Herzberg à a theory of dissatisfiers & satisfiers
• Likert & Argyris à result orientation & people orientation in management

Theory X & theory Y • Douglas McGregor
• The way managers think about & treat their personnel is important in terms of
motivation à can be viewed in perspective of 2 contrasting visions:
Ø Theory X -> people don’t like to work, pressure to do job, no initiative…
Ø Theory Y -> capable of directing themselves & controlling own work

• How are the people?




Ø
• What motivates people?




Ø
• How to manage them?




Ø




4

Les avantages d'acheter des résumés chez Stuvia:

Qualité garantie par les avis des clients

Qualité garantie par les avis des clients

Les clients de Stuvia ont évalués plus de 700 000 résumés. C'est comme ça que vous savez que vous achetez les meilleurs documents.

L’achat facile et rapide

L’achat facile et rapide

Vous pouvez payer rapidement avec iDeal, carte de crédit ou Stuvia-crédit pour les résumés. Il n'y a pas d'adhésion nécessaire.

Focus sur l’essentiel

Focus sur l’essentiel

Vos camarades écrivent eux-mêmes les notes d’étude, c’est pourquoi les documents sont toujours fiables et à jour. Cela garantit que vous arrivez rapidement au coeur du matériel.

Foire aux questions

Qu'est-ce que j'obtiens en achetant ce document ?

Vous obtenez un PDF, disponible immédiatement après votre achat. Le document acheté est accessible à tout moment, n'importe où et indéfiniment via votre profil.

Garantie de remboursement : comment ça marche ?

Notre garantie de satisfaction garantit que vous trouverez toujours un document d'étude qui vous convient. Vous remplissez un formulaire et notre équipe du service client s'occupe du reste.

Auprès de qui est-ce que j'achète ce résumé ?

Stuvia est une place de marché. Alors, vous n'achetez donc pas ce document chez nous, mais auprès du vendeur mauddepermentier. Stuvia facilite les paiements au vendeur.

Est-ce que j'aurai un abonnement?

Non, vous n'achetez ce résumé que pour €7,99. Vous n'êtes lié à rien après votre achat.

Peut-on faire confiance à Stuvia ?

4.6 étoiles sur Google & Trustpilot (+1000 avis)

66579 résumés ont été vendus ces 30 derniers jours

Fondée en 2010, la référence pour acheter des résumés depuis déjà 14 ans

Commencez à vendre!
€7,99
  • (0)
  Ajouter