Garantie de satisfaction à 100% Disponible immédiatement après paiement En ligne et en PDF Tu n'es attaché à rien
logo-home
Lecture 1 European Labour Law and Social Security Law €6,49
Ajouter au panier

Notes de cours

Lecture 1 European Labour Law and Social Security Law

 0 fois vendu
  • Cours
  • Établissement

These are all the notes I took during lecture 1 of the course European Labour Law and Social Security Law. I passed this course with an 8!

Aperçu 2 sur 12  pages

  • 6 avril 2020
  • 12
  • 2018/2019
  • Notes de cours
  • Inconnu
  • Toutes les classes
avatar-seller
European Labour Law & Social Security Law 2018-2019




European labour law and social security law is often referred to as European Social Policy. In
principle labour law and social security law are matters that have to be dealt with by the
member states. It is up to the Member states to regulate and set up their own systems /
determine the conditions etc. So it is in essence a national thing.
So you can ask yourself the question, what is the European law dimension in European
Social Security law?
From the beginning of the EU integration process up to today there is a debate about the
question: why should we give EU power about things that are national?
Some member states think that there is no need at all, while other Member States are in
favour. It is a debate and it is not settled. In essence, there are 4 different answers to the
question if EU should be given powers and if yes, to what extent.
There are 4 school of thoughts, consisting of 2 economic schools and 2 social once:

1

, 1. Economic school of thought: no need for powers / harmonization. According to
this school of thought, the European Union should stay away from labour law and
social security law. Most advocates of this school of thought can be found in the UK.
They think that we should not give the EU any powers, EU is about market
integration. According to them, the creation of the big market will lead to an economic
growth and to more jobs. It is a government task that everybody has a job and can
provide for themselves. According to them, we should leave labour law to the
member states. There is no need to regulate it on EU level, because the market will
lead to economic growth. It will be a national process leading to economic growth.
The UK is usually not pro EU powers on labour law and social security law. Other
member states who also have problems with the EU intervening on national law didn’t
express it because Margaret Thatcher was doing it all. There is among more MS
certain opposition towards the EU. They think they are entitled to determine what the
law is. In the UK they have a different view to organize the solidarity of social security
law.
2. Economic school of thought: powers / harmonization to ensure fair competition
The EU should be given certain powers, not so much to protect poor employees but
to make sure that those companies are placed in a situation of fair and equal
competition. The more protective the EU law is, the stricter the law of dismissal and
the higher the benefits are. It is imposing a financial burden on employers. If the
minimum wages in Germany are much higher than in Portugal, it will mean that
German employers are paying more. It is putting an additional financial burden on
them comparing it with Portugal. If you have one common market and different social
security laws, you create unfair competition between companies. So you want to
make sure they can all compete on equal terms. We should harmonize the terms in
order to make sure that all the companies are placed in an equal position. So it’s
purely for economic reasons for companies. The same thing apply in the field of
environmental policy, health policy etc. You create certain norms and this affects the
Member States. So second reason is to harmonize social norms to make sure that all
the companies are in an equal situation to compete equally.
3. Social school of thought: powers / harmonization needed to prevent social
dumping: A member state sets certain social norms / gives certain social rights.
When there is a freedom of movement, there is always the fear that when the
minimum wages are increased, the big companies are going to flee. In the
Netherlands we want to have higher minimum wages, but the risk is that employers
are going to flee to other countries. As a member state you want to create jobs, but
when the big companies go, you lose jobs. To prevent employers to move to other
countries, the Netherlands needs to lower the minimum wage. So by dumping norms
you are trying to attract companies and create jobs. If the Netherlands start dumping
norms, you will get a snowball effect. Every country is going to do it and you get a
race to the bottom. They are all going to lower the social standards and labour law /
social security law will be gone completely.
How do we avoid the downward movement?
By harmonizing / setting minimum standards that no state can go below. The
harmonization in this school of thought is different than in the second school of
thought. Now we do it for the sake of our workers. Keep in mind that it is very difficult
to harmonize and it depends on the topic. In certain fields it can be done, while in
other fields it is not possible. For example, it is very difficult to harmonize minimum
wages. Even if you take all the things into account, the differences in minimum wages
are so huge. How are you ever going to harmonize it? In the Netherlands it might be
€1000 and in Portugal €300. €300 is unacceptable in the Netherlands while €1000 is
not acceptable in Portugal. Where do we meet, somewhere in the middle? It is very
difficult. Certain topics are easier to harmonize, for example health and safety in
work. You can easily harmonize rules about asbestos in the wall or liability for


2

Les avantages d'acheter des résumés chez Stuvia:

Qualité garantie par les avis des clients

Qualité garantie par les avis des clients

Les clients de Stuvia ont évalués plus de 700 000 résumés. C'est comme ça que vous savez que vous achetez les meilleurs documents.

L’achat facile et rapide

L’achat facile et rapide

Vous pouvez payer rapidement avec iDeal, carte de crédit ou Stuvia-crédit pour les résumés. Il n'y a pas d'adhésion nécessaire.

Focus sur l’essentiel

Focus sur l’essentiel

Vos camarades écrivent eux-mêmes les notes d’étude, c’est pourquoi les documents sont toujours fiables et à jour. Cela garantit que vous arrivez rapidement au coeur du matériel.

Foire aux questions

Qu'est-ce que j'obtiens en achetant ce document ?

Vous obtenez un PDF, disponible immédiatement après votre achat. Le document acheté est accessible à tout moment, n'importe où et indéfiniment via votre profil.

Garantie de remboursement : comment ça marche ?

Notre garantie de satisfaction garantit que vous trouverez toujours un document d'étude qui vous convient. Vous remplissez un formulaire et notre équipe du service client s'occupe du reste.

Auprès de qui est-ce que j'achète ce résumé ?

Stuvia est une place de marché. Alors, vous n'achetez donc pas ce document chez nous, mais auprès du vendeur maastrichtuniversiteit1996. Stuvia facilite les paiements au vendeur.

Est-ce que j'aurai un abonnement?

Non, vous n'achetez ce résumé que pour €6,49. Vous n'êtes lié à rien après votre achat.

Peut-on faire confiance à Stuvia ?

4.6 étoiles sur Google & Trustpilot (+1000 avis)

71241 résumés ont été vendus ces 30 derniers jours

Fondée en 2010, la référence pour acheter des résumés depuis déjà 15 ans

Commencez à vendre!

Récemment vu par vous


€6,49
  • (0)
Ajouter au panier
Ajouté