Garantie de satisfaction à 100% Disponible immédiatement après paiement En ligne et en PDF Tu n'es attaché à rien
logo-home
Samenvatting Introduction to Common Law and Legal English €10,49
Ajouter au panier

Notes de cours

Samenvatting Introduction to Common Law and Legal English

 0 vue  0 fois vendu

Volledige samenvatting van alle hoorcolleges, ik behaalde een 17/20 met het studeren van dit document.

Aperçu 4 sur 86  pages

  • 18 décembre 2024
  • 86
  • 2023/2024
  • Notes de cours
  • Cailin mackenzie
  • Toutes les classes
Tous les documents sur ce sujet (5)
avatar-seller
Finn1695
INTRODUCTION TO COMMON LAW AND
LEGAL ENGLISH 23-24
Gedoceerd door professor Cailin Mackenzie




1. INTRODUCTION AND TERMINOLOGY

1.1. WHAT IS COMMON LAW?

Common law has 4 different meanings :

 Law as developed by judges in the 11the and 12th century to form a common law system for the
whole country  as opposed to the situation prior to the Norman Conquest (1066)

 Rules developed by judges = judge-made law (most of the rules are judge-made) = substantive and
procedural

 Legal systems based on the English legal system = common law systems (as opposed to civil law
systems like we have here.

 The law that was used in common law courts before the reorganization of the court structure in 1873-
1875  law used in courts is one of the most complicated things, whereof Equity is very important.




COUNTRIES WITH COMMO N LAW SYSTEMS + UK
 England and Wales + Northern Ireland
 Republic of Ireland
 Malta = mixed system including common law
 Cyprus



Legal systems in the UK !

The UK consists of 4 nations (GB + NI) with distinct legal systems for certain parts :

 England + Wales
 Northern Ireland
 Scotland

Great Britain = England, Wales and Scotland  here we only discuss England and Wales since Scotland has a
completely different legal system (not common law).




1

,LEGAL TERMINOLOGY
THIS IS NOT A LANGUAGE COURSE!!  terminology is just inherent to the course.

You will be expected to be able to know your way in the English language enough for the professor to
understand what you’re trying to say (so the use of language is not the major point of focus in this course or on
the exam)!




1.2. SOURCES IN COMMON LAW

In common law, there’s no formal list of sources, unlike in continental legal systems.

 Source in common law is case law and customs as they are developed in common law
 The most common source of new rules today is the legislation and since recently the European Law
can be used as a source of law


Though, the original source of common law is reason

 Equity, reason and good sense  most primal sources of legal rules according to Lord Mansfield
(1773)
 For common law the most prominent source is said to be logical reason, for equity it is said to be
moral reason
 Legal rules should be looked at from the point of view of Justice and interpreted
accordingly but in some situations the pure logical reason interpretation of legal rules
could lead to unfair and unjust outcomes, therefore equity needs to be used by using
moral reason to interpret certain rules.



Non in legendo sed in intelligendo legis consistent

“The reason of the law is the life of the law, for tho’ a man can tell the law, yet if he know not the reason
thereof, he shall soon forget his superficial knowledge, but when he findeth the right reason of the law and so
bringeth it to his natural reason that he comprehendeth as his own, this will not only serve him for the
understanding of that particular case but of many others.” – Lord Chief Coke, early 17th century

= we need to “understand” the law, know the reason behind legal rules to actually know the law




WHERE CAN WE FIND LAW?
Orthodox legal sources :

 Parliament = statutes and statutory instruments  parliament is the law-maker
 Courts and tribunals = precedents  common law
 European Union / community


2

,1.3. LEGISLATION

Parliament as a rule-maker

Parliament is the most important law-maker in terms of volume of rules created but also in terms of hierarchy
 so they make the most rules and are the highest legal power in the UK

 The parliament is a sovereign and supreme entity and therefore has the ultimate decision-making
power = parliamentary sovereignty (in UK)
 No court can question the legislation made by parliament BUT this does NOT mean the
government is sovereign (parliament and government are two different things)

 Position of the parliament was settled in the Bill of Rights in 1689

 R (on the application of Miller) (Appellant) v The Prime Minister (Respondent)  Supreme Court
decision that emphasizes the importance of the sovereignty of parliament

 The former case was consolidated with Cherry and others (Respondents) v Advocate
General for Scotland (Appellant) (Scotland) [2019] UKSC 41



Also important to know : legislation is written in very precise language by specialized legal draftsmen and is
NOT subject to judicial review by judges.



A typical piece of legislation is called a statute

Children Act 1989 Chapter 41 – PART I INTRODUCTORY
UK Statutes Crown Copyright. Entry into force : October 14, 1991
S 1 Welfare of the childe
(1) When a court determines any question with respect to –
(a) The upbringing of a child; or
(b) The administration of a child’s property or the application of any income arising from it, the
child’s welfare shall be the court’s paramount consideration
(2) In any proceedings in which any question with respect tot the upbringing of a child arises, the
court shall have regard to the general principle that any delay in determining the question is likely
to prejudice the welfare of the child…




1.4. STATUTORY INTERPRETATION

Statutory interpretation = interpretation of primary legislation  the process by which courts interpret and
apply the meaning of statutes (laws) when resolving legal disputes

Even though the highly skilled work of the parliamentary legal draftsmen is aimed to make the law clear and to
avoid the need for statutory interpretation, statutory interpretation is often still needed for a variety of reasons




3

,  Judges can be hostile to legislation, preferring not to assist the legislator in achieving the aims of the
statute

 The Interpretation Act (1978) defines many words and phrases, these definitions should be used to
interpret statutes. The rest is left to the court to deal with = courts have developed own rules of
statutory interpretation

 Statutory interpretation is needed for unclear wording, to avoid absurd circumstances, for protection
of human rights etc. (infra)

 Background reading : The Law Commission (21) and The Interpretation of Statutes (1969)




Terminology :

 To construe = to interpret
 Construction = interpretation




So why do we need statutory interpretation?

 Unclear wording in legislation

 Too broad wording

 New developments since a certain statute was introduced

 Drafting mistakes = errors or oversights made during the process of creating legislation

 Change in the meaning of words

 Mistakes made in the legislation




A. THE LITERAL RULE
Implementing the literal rule means you use the ordinary and natural meaning of words used in the statute
itself. There is no ambiguity (it’s not open to any other interpretation than the actual words given)

Important case-law / precedents :

 Sussex Peerage Claim (1844) :
“The only rule for the construction of Acts of Parliament is, that they should be construed according to
the intent of the Parliament which passed the Act. If the words of the statute are in themselves precise
and unambiguous, then no more can be necessary than to expound those words in their natural and
ordinary sense. The words themselves alone do, in such a case, best declare the intention of the
lawgiver.” (Per Tindal CJ, at 143)

4

Les avantages d'acheter des résumés chez Stuvia:

Qualité garantie par les avis des clients

Qualité garantie par les avis des clients

Les clients de Stuvia ont évalués plus de 700 000 résumés. C'est comme ça que vous savez que vous achetez les meilleurs documents.

L’achat facile et rapide

L’achat facile et rapide

Vous pouvez payer rapidement avec iDeal, carte de crédit ou Stuvia-crédit pour les résumés. Il n'y a pas d'adhésion nécessaire.

Focus sur l’essentiel

Focus sur l’essentiel

Vos camarades écrivent eux-mêmes les notes d’étude, c’est pourquoi les documents sont toujours fiables et à jour. Cela garantit que vous arrivez rapidement au coeur du matériel.

Foire aux questions

Qu'est-ce que j'obtiens en achetant ce document ?

Vous obtenez un PDF, disponible immédiatement après votre achat. Le document acheté est accessible à tout moment, n'importe où et indéfiniment via votre profil.

Garantie de remboursement : comment ça marche ?

Notre garantie de satisfaction garantit que vous trouverez toujours un document d'étude qui vous convient. Vous remplissez un formulaire et notre équipe du service client s'occupe du reste.

Auprès de qui est-ce que j'achète ce résumé ?

Stuvia est une place de marché. Alors, vous n'achetez donc pas ce document chez nous, mais auprès du vendeur Finn1695. Stuvia facilite les paiements au vendeur.

Est-ce que j'aurai un abonnement?

Non, vous n'achetez ce résumé que pour €10,49. Vous n'êtes lié à rien après votre achat.

Peut-on faire confiance à Stuvia ?

4.6 étoiles sur Google & Trustpilot (+1000 avis)

56326 résumés ont été vendus ces 30 derniers jours

Fondée en 2010, la référence pour acheter des résumés depuis déjà 14 ans

Commencez à vendre!
€10,49
  • (0)
Ajouter au panier
Ajouté