Resume
Samenvatting Taalfilosofie Lycan W.G. 2008. Philosophy of Language. A Contemporary Introduction
Samenvatting van alle 14 hoofdstukken uit en het boek en de slides van docent. Bevat ook mogelijke vragen.
[Montrer plus]
Livre connecté
Titre de l’ouvrage:
Auteur(s):
- Édition:
- ISBN:
- Édition:
Vendeur
S'abonner
Aperçu du contenu
1: IntroductionPhilosophy of Language starts with following data:
1. Some strings of marks or noises are meaningful sentences
2. Meaningful sentences have meaningful parts
3. Meaningful sentences mean something particular
4. Meaningful sentences are understood and produced without effort and almost
simultaneously
Explanandum (EXM): human ability to produce and understand speech
Referential Theory: linguistic expressions have the meanings they do because they stand for things
Words are like labels
Words refer to / denote / name / represent / designate things in the world
Understanding a sentence = knowing what the sentence’s components refer to
3 objections:
1) Not every word does name or denote any actual object:
a. I saw nobody
b. Ralph is fat
c. On someone’s behalf
d. Hello, yes, very
2) According to RT, a sentence is a list full of names. But a mere list of names doesn’t say
anything
a. Gerrie catlike
3) There is more to meaning than reference, two terms can share their referent but differ in
meaning
a. Pope - Benedictus
Exam questions:
1) What are the four data which – according to Lycan – need explaining in our philosophical
study of language? Use one or more examples of your own to illustrate these explananda.
2) What is the Referential Theory of Meaning (RTM)? What are the main objections which it
faces?* Explain these objections using examples of your own.
,Part 1. Reference and Referring: 2: Definite descriptions
Definite description: description which picks out one particular thing/person/place/time/ via its
attributes
4 puzzles:
1. The problem of apparent reference to nonexistents
2. The problem of negative existentials
3. Frege’s puzzle about identity
4. The problem of substitutivity
Russel’s Theory of Descriptions:
Apparent singular term disappears on analysis (conjunction of three quantified general
statements)
“nobody” not singular term, but quantifier
1. Present King of France is bald
a. At least one person is presently King of France
b. At most one person is presently King of France
c. Whoever is presently King of France is bald
2. Present King of France does not exist
a. At least one person is presently King of France
b. At most one person is presently King of France
c. Whoever is presently King of France does not exist
3. Present queen of England is Elizabeth Windsor
a. At least one person is presently Queen of England
b. At most one person is presently Queen of England
c. Whoever is presently Queen of England is Elizabeth Windsor
4. Albert believes that the author of Nothing and Beingness is a profound thinker
a. At least one person authored Nothing and Beingness
b. At most one person authored Nothing and Beingness
c. Whoever authored Nothing and Beingness is a profound thinker
Objections:
1) According to Russel 1. is false, but Strawson claims it is not incorrect, but abortive, it does
not even get a chance to be false in the given context. Sentences are not the things that can
be true or false. Only statements made by speakers (in a context) can be true or false
2) Strawson: many descriptions are context-bound (restricted quantifier: secondary sense in
which expressions do refer)
a. eat anything on pizza
3) Donnellan’s distinction: 2 uses of a definite description
a. Referential use (overlooked by Russel, who claims that “all descriptions pick out
individuals via their attributes”)
b. Attributive use (overlooked by Strawson, who “writes as if all descriptions are used
referentially, in a context, to draw somebody’s attention to a particular person,
place or thing”)
Meinong’s solution to The Problem of Negative Existentials:
Difference between being [subsistence] and existence (simplifying); something can have being and
be referred to even though it lacks existence
Near-miss case (Donellan): difference between meaning or reference of linguistic expression and
what a speaker means or refers to in using the expression (cf. the guy drinking Martini/Water at the
party)
, MacKay: Even if one misspeaks, one’s actual referent may be the semantic referent rather than the
speaker referent
4) Anaphora: an anaphoric expression which inherits its meaning from another expression, its
antecedent, usually though not always occurring earlier in the sentence or in a previous
sentence. Causes a problem with the conjunction of three quantified general statements.
a. cf. ‘’Just one woman was invited for the job interview. She knows a lot about
property rights’’ does not mean the same as ‘’Just one woman was invited for the
job interview. Just one woman knows a lot about property rights’’
Exam questions:
1) Lycan discusses four puzzles which show that the Referential Theory of Meaning (RTM) is not
true of definite descriptions.* Explain each puzzle and illustrate them with examples of your
own.
2) How does Russell’s Theory of Descriptions (RTD) solve each of the four puzzles* which show
that the Referential Theory of Meaning (RTM) is not true of definite descriptions?
3) What are objections 1, 3 and 4 to Russell’s Theory of Descriptions (RTD)?* Explain each of
these objections and illustrate them with examples of your own.
Les avantages d'acheter des résumés chez Stuvia:
Qualité garantie par les avis des clients
Les clients de Stuvia ont évalués plus de 700 000 résumés. C'est comme ça que vous savez que vous achetez les meilleurs documents.
L’achat facile et rapide
Vous pouvez payer rapidement avec iDeal, carte de crédit ou Stuvia-crédit pour les résumés. Il n'y a pas d'adhésion nécessaire.
Focus sur l’essentiel
Vos camarades écrivent eux-mêmes les notes d’étude, c’est pourquoi les documents sont toujours fiables et à jour. Cela garantit que vous arrivez rapidement au coeur du matériel.
Foire aux questions
Qu'est-ce que j'obtiens en achetant ce document ?
Vous obtenez un PDF, disponible immédiatement après votre achat. Le document acheté est accessible à tout moment, n'importe où et indéfiniment via votre profil.
Garantie de remboursement : comment ça marche ?
Notre garantie de satisfaction garantit que vous trouverez toujours un document d'étude qui vous convient. Vous remplissez un formulaire et notre équipe du service client s'occupe du reste.
Auprès de qui est-ce que j'achète ce résumé ?
Stuvia est une place de marché. Alors, vous n'achetez donc pas ce document chez nous, mais auprès du vendeur gideonvdhorst. Stuvia facilite les paiements au vendeur.
Est-ce que j'aurai un abonnement?
Non, vous n'achetez ce résumé que pour €6,99. Vous n'êtes lié à rien après votre achat.
Peut-on faire confiance à Stuvia ?
4.6 étoiles sur Google & Trustpilot (+1000 avis)
67474 résumés ont été vendus ces 30 derniers jours
Fondée en 2010, la référence pour acheter des résumés depuis déjà 14 ans