100% tevredenheidsgarantie Direct beschikbaar na betaling Zowel online als in PDF Je zit nergens aan vast
logo-home
Summary Week 6 Final Paper CRJ 627.docx CRJ 627 Wayne Williams Written Report The University of Arizona Global Campus CRJ 627: Advanced Forensic Science https://screencast-o-matic.com/watch/crlVezVIPaA Wayne Williams Report Wayne Williams is suspected of mu €6,93   In winkelwagen

Samenvatting

Summary Week 6 Final Paper CRJ 627.docx CRJ 627 Wayne Williams Written Report The University of Arizona Global Campus CRJ 627: Advanced Forensic Science https://screencast-o-matic.com/watch/crlVezVIPaA Wayne Williams Report Wayne Williams is suspected of mu

 1 keer bekeken  0 keer verkocht
  • Vak
  • Instelling

Week 6 Final Paper CRJ CRJ 627 Wayne Williams Written Report The University of Arizona Global Campus CRJ 627: Advanced Forensic Science

Voorbeeld 2 van de 9  pagina's

  • 30 maart 2022
  • 9
  • 2021/2022
  • Samenvatting
avatar-seller
CRJ 627
Wayne Williams Written Report


The University of Arizona Global Campus

CRJ 627: Advanced Forensic Science


https://screencast-o-matic.com/watch/crlVezVIPaA

Wayne Williams Report

Wayne Williams is suspected of murdering more than 20 Black youths from 1979 to 1981

in Atlanta Georgia. Williams was 22 years-old when he was arrested as a suspect in the Atlanta

murders. Investigators believed that Williams was responsible for majority of the Atlanta

murders. The only clue that the detectives had to go on was the yellow-green nylon carpet fiber

that was found on many of the bodies, which led the investigators to believe the killings were

connected. There were also hairs found of different victims that displayed a match to Williams

own hair. Wayne Williams was found guilty in the murders of two adults, Nathaniel Cater and

Jimmy Ray Payne. He was sentenced to two consecutive life sentences. Investigators stated that

evidence connected him to most of the killings however he was not charged with them. This

paper will explain different techniques used to process non-biological trace, biological, and

digital evidence in the field and laboratory setting, comparing of handling major evidence at the

time of discovery, and how it would be handled today. This paper will also include legal and

ethical issues in relation to the court admissibility dealing with collection and forensic testing of

evidence, as well as current challenges and future issues relevant to the case. I will also analyze

any legal or court issues that came about after some time in the initial investigation, differentiate

evidence admissibility standard back then and now, explaining differences in handling and

processing procedures and the evolution in forensics that happened that would have impact on

this case. Lastly, an evaluation of the preferred methods and techniques used in the field and the

laboratory as it relates to the case.

, Different techniques used to process non-biological trace, biological, and digital

evidence in the field, and laboratory setting.


When first responders arrive at the crime scene it is important that they document and

preserve the evidence before investigators arrive. First responder must be careful that they do not

contaminate any evidence. The evidence is processed by the forensic team using different

scientific techniques. Trace evidence consist of soil, grass, dirt, fibers, glass, and bullet fragments

(Dutelle, 2017). Any trace evidence as well as hair evidence found at a scene is collected and

properly labeled before sending it out to the laboratory. When analyzing trace evidence or hair

evidence microscopes are used. The types of microscopes used today includes compound

microscopes, stereoscopes, electron scopes, and more.

Biological evidence consists of blood, bodily fluids, skin, semen, urine, and this kind of

evidence can pose a risk. To collect this evidence the forensic team, use cotton tip applicators

are, if hair is being collected it is placed in an envelope (Kleypas, Badiye, 2021). The collection

of evidence is the same as trace evidence, document and photograph the evidence, properly

secure it by putting it in a paper bag or envelope, closing and sealing it, labeling the bag or

envelope with identifying information, place signature, date, and time on the envelope (Kleypas,

Badiye, 2021).

Fingerprints present at the scene consist of latent, plaster, and patent in nature. Plastic

fingerprints have a three-dimensional appearance from being impressed into soft material such as

wet putty, soap, wet cement and dust. Patent fingerprints are easily identifiable. This kind of print

are found in material such as ink, blood, oil, or chocolate. These prints require no processing

(Dutelle, 2017). Latent fingerprints require more processing to make the print visible and

suitable for comparison. When collecting fingerprints photographs and measurements should be

taken, as well as light sources, chemicals to provide a clear photograph.

Voordelen van het kopen van samenvattingen bij Stuvia op een rij:

√  	Verzekerd van kwaliteit door reviews

√ Verzekerd van kwaliteit door reviews

Stuvia-klanten hebben meer dan 700.000 samenvattingen beoordeeld. Zo weet je zeker dat je de beste documenten koopt!

Snel en makkelijk kopen

Snel en makkelijk kopen

Je betaalt supersnel en eenmalig met iDeal, Bancontact of creditcard voor de samenvatting. Zonder lidmaatschap.

Focus op de essentie

Focus op de essentie

Samenvattingen worden geschreven voor en door anderen. Daarom zijn de samenvattingen altijd betrouwbaar en actueel. Zo kom je snel tot de kern!

Veelgestelde vragen

Wat krijg ik als ik dit document koop?

Je krijgt een PDF, die direct beschikbaar is na je aankoop. Het gekochte document is altijd, overal en oneindig toegankelijk via je profiel.

Tevredenheidsgarantie: hoe werkt dat?

Onze tevredenheidsgarantie zorgt ervoor dat je altijd een studiedocument vindt dat goed bij je past. Je vult een formulier in en onze klantenservice regelt de rest.

Van wie koop ik deze samenvatting?

Stuvia is een marktplaats, je koop dit document dus niet van ons, maar van verkoper nerdpool. Stuvia faciliteert de betaling aan de verkoper.

Zit ik meteen vast aan een abonnement?

Nee, je koopt alleen deze samenvatting voor €6,93. Je zit daarna nergens aan vast.

Is Stuvia te vertrouwen?

4,6 sterren op Google & Trustpilot (+1000 reviews)

Afgelopen 30 dagen zijn er 78110 samenvattingen verkocht

Opgericht in 2010, al 14 jaar dé plek om samenvattingen te kopen

Start met verkopen
€6,93
  • (0)
  Kopen