Samenvatting

Summary of all literature and lectures of The Social Psychology Of Communication (PSB3E-SP03)

16 keer verkocht

Vak
The Social Psychology Of Communication (PSB3ESP03)

Instelling
Rijksuniversiteit Groningen (RuG)

Ontdek deze diepgaande samenvatting van de literatuur en colleges over "The Social Psychology of Communication (PSB3E-SP03)". Alles wat je nodig hebt voor je tentamen. Deze 77-pagina's tellende samenvatting, geschreven in het Engels, behandelt alle wetenschappelijke artikelen die je moet kennen voo...

[Meer zien]

Voorbeeld 4 van de 77 pagina's

Bekijk voorbeeld

Geupload op 31 maart 2023
Aantal pagina's 77
Geschreven in 2022/2023
Type Samenvatting

taxonomy of speech
gossip
voice intonation
speech accents
nonverbal communication
gestures
cognitive approach to human communication
constituting relationships in talk
communication accommodation theo

Instelling
Rijksuniversiteit Groningen (RuG)
Studie
Psychologie
Vak
The Social Psychology Of Communication (PSB3ESP03)

€7,59

In winkelwagen

Op verlanglijstje

100% tevredenheidsgarantie
Direct beschikbaar na je betaling
Lees online óf als PDF
Geen vaste maandelijkse kosten

The Social Psychology of Communication
Literature Summary

Table of Contents
Week 1: What do we talk about?...........................................................................................3

Reading 1: Dillard, J.P., Segrin, C., & Harden, J.M. (1989). Primary and secondary goals in
the production of interpersonal influence messages. (p. 19-24 & table 2) ................................. 3

Reading 2: Greene, J. O. (1984). A cognitive approach to human communication: An action
assembly theory. (p. 289-294) ..................................................................................................... 5

Reading 3: Goldsmith, D.J., & Baxter, L.A. (1996). Constituting relationships in talk: A
taxonomy of speech events in social and personal relationships. (p. 87-94 & 103-111)............. 7

Reading 4: Baumeister, R.F., Zhang, L., & Vohs, K.D. (2004). Gossip as cultural learning. (p.
111-121) ..................................................................................................................................... 10

Week 2: How do we speak? ................................................................................................. 16

Reading 1: Elbert, S.P., & Dijkstra, A. (2014). An experimental test of the relationship
between voice intonation and persuasion in the domain of health. ......................................... 16

Reading 2: Fuertes, J.N., Potere, J.C., & Ramirez, K.Y. (2002). Effects of speech accents on
interpersonal evaluations: Implications for counseling practice and research. ...................... 18

Reading 3: Poyatos, F. (2002). Nonverbal communication across disciplines. Volume II.
Paralanguage, kinesics, silence, personal and environmental interaction. .............................. 22

Week 3: What do we show?................................................................................................. 24

Reading 1: Ekman, P., & Sullivan, M.O. (2006). From flawed self-assessment to blatant
whoppers: The utility of voluntary behavior in detecting deception. ...................................... 24

Reading 2: Gordon, R.A., Druckman, D., Rozelle, R.M., & Baxter, J.C. (2006). Non-verbal
behaviour as communication: Approaches, issues and research. ............................................ 27

Reading 3: Maricchiolo, F., Gnisci, A., Bonaiuto, M., & Ficca, G. (2009). Effects of different
type of hand gestures in persuasive speech on receiver’s evaluations. .................................... 32

Week 4: How can we understand the complexity of communication? ................................ 36

Reading 1: Andersen, P.A. (2015). Arousal Theories of Interaction Adaptation. ................... 36

Reading 2: Burgoon, J. K. (2015). Expectancy Violations Theory. ......................................... 40

, Reading 3: Dragojevic, M., Gasiorek, J., & Giles, H. (2015). Communication Accommodation
Theory. ...................................................................................................................................... 44

Reading 4: Miller-Ott, A., & Kelly, L. (2015). The Presence of Cell Phones in Romantic
Partner Face-to-Face Interactions: An Expectancy Violation Theory Approach. .................. 47

Week 5: How do cultures differ? ........................................................................................ 50

Reading 1: Brantley-Hill, S. M., & Brinthaupt, T. M. (2014). Perceptions of affectionate
communication among people with unfavorable and favorable attitudes toward
homosexuality............................................................................................................................ 50

Reading 2: Gudykunst, W. B. (2004). Bridging Differences: Effective Intergroup
Communication. ........................................................................................................................ 52

Reading 3: Matsumoto, D. (1990). Cultural similarities and differences in display rules....... 55

Week 6: How do we communicate through new media?..................................................... 59

Reading 1: Derks, D., Fischer, A.H., & Bos, A.E, R. (2008). The role of emotion in computer-
mediated communication: A review. ........................................................................................ 59

Reading 2: Koudenburg, N. (2018). Regulating shared reality with micro-dynamics in the
form of conversation. ................................................................................................................ 64

Reading 3: Toma, C.L., Hancock, J.T., & Ellison, N.B. (2008). Separating fact from fiction:
An examination of deceptive self-presentation in online dating profiles. ................................ 67

Reading 4: Paxling, B., Lundgren, S., Norman, A., Almlov, J., Carlbring, P., Cuijpers, P., &
Andersson, G. (2013). Therapist behaviours in Internet-delivered cognitive behaviour
therapy: Analyses of email correspondence in the treatment of generalized Anxiety Disorder.
................................................................................................................................................... 70

Week 7: How can we communicate with computers? ......................................................... 72

Reading 1: Chidambaram, V., Chiang, Y., & Mutlu, B. (2012). Designing persuasive robots:
How robots might persuade people using vocal and nonverbal cues....................................... 72

Method/experimental design..................................................................................................... 72

Reading 2: Kreps, G.L., & Neuhauser, L. (2013). Artificial intelligence and immediacy:
Designing health communication to personally engage consumers and providers. ................ 74

Reading 3: Nass, C., & Moon, Y. (2000). Machines and mindlessness: Social responses to
computers. ................................................................................................................................. 76

2

,Week 1: What do we talk about?
Reading 1: Dillard, J.P., Segrin, C., & Harden, J.M. (1989). Primary and
secondary goals in the production of interpersonal influence messages. (p.
19-24 & table 2)

Introduction
Individual’s activities, prior to and during an interpersonal influence attempt, may be
explained by his/her goals.
1. Primary/influence goals: Instigate the influence process.
2. Secondary goals: Shape it.
• Individuals attempt to influence others in order to achieve their own ends (study
of compliance-gaining).
• Goals of altering the behavior of another is believed to engender planning, which
in turn guides the actions of the source.
Goals and interpersonal influence
• Compliance-gaining theory: Isolates two types of goals: Social actors must
confront the issue of how to behave so as to produce the desired outcome, while at
the same time considering the costs associated with different approaches.
• Persuasive strategy selection is based on twin criteria:
1. Desire to be effective
2. Desire to conform the constraints inherent in the particular situation in which the
influence attempt takes place.
• From this assumption comes forth two types of goals.
1. Primary/influence goals (bring about behavioral change in a target person)
2. Secondary goals (objectives of several sorts that derive directly from more general
motivations recurring in a person’s life)
• Four secondary goals.
1. Identity goals (related to the self-concept, internal standards of behavior that may or
may not overlap with expectations about how others should behave. Derive from
morals, principles, preferences).
2. Interaction goals (social appropriateness, represents source’s desire to manage
impression successfully).

3

, 3. Resource goals (focus on increasing/maintaining valued assets. Assets can be three
types: Relational (personal rewards and gratifications: Attention, positive stimulation,
emotional support, social comparison), material (physical objects including money)
and physical (aspects of the source’s health which might be compromised in an
interpersonal influence attempt)).
4. Arousal management goals (communication events have arousal properties, are
experienced as pleasurable or unpleasurable. People have a desire to maintain a state
of arousal, that is the arousal management goal.
Distinguishing primary and secondary goals
• Two classes differ.
• Primary goals are more central (define interpersonal situations).
• Awareness of a primary goal stimulated a consideration of secondary goals
(primary goal = initial push, activated cognitive calculus that incorporates all the
secondary goals. Secondary goals function to shape and constrain the behaviors to
alter the behavior of the target)
• Notion of influence goal alone has no substance.
Study 1: The substance of goals
• Function: Gather data reflecting concerns which individual sources face in
interpersonal influence situations.
• Data from study one provided an indication of the potential utility of the set of
goal constructs. Statements suggested that persons engaged in strategic influence
are aware of and concern themselves with these goals.

4

Dit zijn jouw voordelen als je samenvattingen koopt bij Stuvia:

Bewezen kwaliteit door reviews

Studenten hebben al meer dan 850.000 samenvattingen beoordeeld. Zo weet jij zeker dat je de beste keuze maakt!

In een paar klikken geregeld

Geen gedoe — betaal gewoon eenmalig met iDeal, Bancontact of creditcard en je bent klaar. Geen abonnement nodig.

Focus op de essentie

Studenten maken samenvattingen voor studenten. Dat betekent: actuele inhoud waar jij écht wat aan hebt. Geen overbodige details!

Veelgestelde vragen

Wat krijg ik als ik dit document koop?

Je krijgt een PDF, die direct beschikbaar is na je aankoop. Het gekochte document is altijd, overal en oneindig toegankelijk via je profiel.

Tevredenheidsgarantie: hoe werkt dat?

Onze tevredenheidsgarantie zorgt ervoor dat je altijd een studiedocument vindt dat goed bij je past. Je vult een formulier in en onze klantenservice regelt de rest.

Van wie koop ik deze samenvatting?

Stuvia is een marktplaats, je koop dit document dus niet van ons, maar van verkoper sophieakkerman. Stuvia faciliteert de betaling aan de verkoper.

Zit ik meteen vast aan een abonnement?

Nee, je koopt alleen deze samenvatting voor €7,59. Je zit daarna nergens aan vast.

Is Stuvia te vertrouwen?

4,6 sterren op Google & Trustpilot (+1000 reviews)

Afgelopen 30 dagen zijn er 68175 samenvattingen verkocht

Opgericht in 2010, al 15 jaar dé plek om samenvattingen te kopen

Start met verkopen