AW fallacies:
Ad hominem: attacking the person of a source, rather than his or her qualifications or
reliability or the actual argument they make
o It’s no surprise that Carl Sagan argued for life on Mars – After all, he was a well-
known atheist, I don’t believe it for a minute
Appeal to ignorance (ad ignorantiam): arguing that a claim is true just because it has not
been shown to be false
o I do not have much information on this except the general statement of the agency
that there is nothing in the files to disprove his Communist connections
Appeal to pity (ad misericordiam): appealing to pity as an argument for special treatment
o I know I flunked every exam, but if I don’t pass this course, I’ll have to retake it in
summer school. You have to let me pass!
Ad populum: appealing to the emotion of a crowd, what most people thinks is true
o Everyone learns from there parents that Adam and Eve were the first people on
earth. Therefore it is true.
Circular argument: implicitly using your conclusion as a premise
o The bible is true because God wrote it, the Bible says that God exists, therefor God
exists
o You can count on WARP News for the facts, because the station’s motto is “we just
give you the facts” so that must be a fact too
Complex question: posing a question in such a way that people cannot agree or disagree
with you without committing themselves to some other claim you wish to promote
o Are you still still as self-centered as you used to be?
Saying yes or no, commits you to agreeing that you used to be selfish
o Will you follow your conscience instead of your pocketbook and donate to the
cause?
Saying no, makes people feel guilty
Saying yes, makes people feel noble
Equivocation: sliding from one meaning of a term to another in the middle of an argument
o Women and men are physically and emotionally different; the sexes are not equal,
then and therefore the law should not pretend that we are
Equal: the sexes are not physically and emotionally equal
Equality before the law
False cause: generic term for any questionable conclusion about cause and effect
False dilemma: Reducing the options you consider to just two, often diametrically opposed
to each other and unfair to the people against whom the dilemma is posed
Loaded language: language that primarily plays on the emotions. It does not make an
argument at all
Non sequitur: drawing a conclusion that ‘does not follow’; that is, a conclusion that is not
reasonable inference from the evidence
Overgeneralizing: generalizing from too few examples
Overlooking alternatives: forgetting that things may happen for a variety of reasons, not just
one
o When the roads are icy, the mail is late.
The male is late, therefore the roads are icy
Persuasive definition: defining a term in a way that may seem to be straightforward but is in
fact loaded
Voordelen van het kopen van samenvattingen bij Stuvia op een rij:
√ Verzekerd van kwaliteit door reviews
Stuvia-klanten hebben meer dan 700.000 samenvattingen beoordeeld. Zo weet je zeker dat je de beste documenten koopt!
Snel en makkelijk kopen
Je betaalt supersnel en eenmalig met iDeal, Bancontact of creditcard voor de samenvatting. Zonder lidmaatschap.
Focus op de essentie
Samenvattingen worden geschreven voor en door anderen. Daarom zijn de samenvattingen altijd betrouwbaar en actueel. Zo kom je snel tot de kern!
Veelgestelde vragen
Wat krijg ik als ik dit document koop?
Je krijgt een PDF, die direct beschikbaar is na je aankoop. Het gekochte document is altijd, overal en oneindig toegankelijk via je profiel.
Tevredenheidsgarantie: hoe werkt dat?
Onze tevredenheidsgarantie zorgt ervoor dat je altijd een studiedocument vindt dat goed bij je past. Je vult een formulier in en onze klantenservice regelt de rest.
Van wie koop ik deze samenvatting?
Stuvia is een marktplaats, je koop dit document dus niet van ons, maar van verkoper emmaboesmans. Stuvia faciliteert de betaling aan de verkoper.
Zit ik meteen vast aan een abonnement?
Nee, je koopt alleen deze samenvatting voor €6,99. Je zit daarna nergens aan vast.