100% tevredenheidsgarantie Direct beschikbaar na betaling Zowel online als in PDF Je zit nergens aan vast
Eerder door jou gezocht
FUR2601 Assignment 2 (COMPLETE ANSWERS) Semester 2 2024 - DUE 27 September 2024 Course Fundamental Rights (FUR2601) Institution University Of South Africa (Unisa) Book The Bill of Rights Handbook€2,44
In winkelwagen
FUR2601 Assignment 2 (COMPLETE ANSWERS) Semester 2 2024 - DUE 27 September 2024 Course Fundamental Rights (FUR2601) Institution University Of South Africa (Unisa) Book The Bill of Rights Handbook
78 keer bekeken 4 keer verkocht
Vak
Fundamental Rights
Instelling
University Of South Africa
Boek
The Bill of Rights Handbook
FUR2601 Assignment 2 (COMPLETE ANSWERS) Semester 2 2024 - DUE 27 September 2024
Course
Fundamental Rights (FUR2601)
Institution
University Of South Africa (Unisa)
Book
The Bill of Rights Handbook
Fur2602 FUNDAMENTAL RIGHTS assign 2 semester 2 2024
FUR2601 Assignment 2 (COMPLETE ANSWERS) Semester 2 2024 - DUE 27 September 2024 ; 100% TRUSTED Complete, trusted solutions and explanations.
Alles voor dit studieboek (31)
Geschreven voor
University of South Africa
Fundamental Rights
Alle documenten voor dit vak (3)
Verkoper
Volgen
Jennifer2024
Ontvangen beoordelingen
Voorbeeld van de inhoud
FUR2601 Assignment 2
(COMPLETE ANSWERS)
Semester 2 2024 - DUE 27
September 2024 ; 100%
TRUSTED
ADMIN
[COMPANY NAME]
,Question 1 Describe the role of and how extensively the
Constitutional Court used international law as well as foreign law in
the interpretation of the rights in the Bill of Rights. (10 marks)
The Constitutional Court of South Africa has a well-documented
history of using international law and foreign law in its
interpretation of the rights enshrined in the Bill of Rights. This
approach aligns with Section 39(1) of the South African
Constitution, which explicitly directs courts to consider international
law and permits the use of foreign law in interpreting the Bill of
Rights. Here is a detailed description of how the Constitutional
Court employs these sources:
Role and Extent of International Law
1. Constitutional Mandate: Section 39(1)(b) of the Constitution
mandates that when interpreting the Bill of Rights, a court
"must consider international law." This inclusion emphasizes
the importance of international standards and norms in shaping
the understanding and application of human rights in South
Africa.
2. Guiding Principles: The Court often looks to international
human rights instruments, such as the Universal Declaration of
Human Rights, the International Covenant on Civil and
Political Rights (ICCPR), and the Convention on the
Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination Against Women
(CEDAW), among others, to guide its interpretation.
3. Case Examples:
o S v Makwanyane (1995): The Constitutional Court
abolished the death penalty, referencing various
international human rights treaties and conventions to
, support its decision, showcasing the pivotal role of
international law in influencing its judgment.
o Government of the Republic of South Africa v
Grootboom (2000): The Court used international legal
standards to interpret the right to housing, demonstrating
its commitment to aligning domestic law with
international human rights norms.
Role and Extent of Foreign Law
1. Permissive Consideration: Section 39(1)(c) allows courts to
consider foreign law, which provides a broader scope for
drawing on comparative legal perspectives and enriching the
interpretation of rights with diverse legal traditions and
practices.
2. Comparative Analysis: The Constitutional Court frequently
examines jurisprudence from jurisdictions with similar
constitutional frameworks, such as Canada, Germany, India,
and the United States. This comparative analysis helps the
Court to adopt best practices and innovative approaches to
human rights protection.
3. Case Examples:
o Carmichele v Minister of Safety and Security (2001):
The Court referenced foreign case law from the UK and
Canada to develop the concept of state liability in the
context of protecting individuals from gender-based
violence.
o Khosa v Minister of Social Development (2004): The
Court looked at foreign precedents to interpret the socio-
economic rights of non-citizens, underscoring the value
of foreign legal principles in shaping equitable and just
outcomes.
Conclusion
Voordelen van het kopen van samenvattingen bij Stuvia op een rij:
√ Verzekerd van kwaliteit door reviews
Stuvia-klanten hebben meer dan 700.000 samenvattingen beoordeeld. Zo weet je zeker dat je de beste documenten koopt!
Snel en makkelijk kopen
Je betaalt supersnel en eenmalig met iDeal, Bancontact of creditcard voor de samenvatting. Zonder lidmaatschap.
Focus op de essentie
Samenvattingen worden geschreven voor en door anderen. Daarom zijn de samenvattingen altijd betrouwbaar en actueel. Zo kom je snel tot de kern!
Veelgestelde vragen
Wat krijg ik als ik dit document koop?
Je krijgt een PDF, die direct beschikbaar is na je aankoop. Het gekochte document is altijd, overal en oneindig toegankelijk via je profiel.
Tevredenheidsgarantie: hoe werkt dat?
Onze tevredenheidsgarantie zorgt ervoor dat je altijd een studiedocument vindt dat goed bij je past. Je vult een formulier in en onze klantenservice regelt de rest.
Van wie koop ik deze samenvatting?
Stuvia is een marktplaats, je koop dit document dus niet van ons, maar van verkoper Jennifer2024. Stuvia faciliteert de betaling aan de verkoper.
Zit ik meteen vast aan een abonnement?
Nee, je koopt alleen deze samenvatting voor €2,44. Je zit daarna nergens aan vast.
