Overig
Shorter and longer questions of the Law of Persons module
- Vak
- Instelling
- Boek
Shorter and longer questions of the Law of Persons module
[Meer zien]Voorbeeld 4 van de 35 pagina's
Voorbeeld 4 van de 35 pagina's
In winkelwagen
In winkelwagen
gesponsord bericht van onze partner
Gekoppeld boek
Titel boek:
Auteur(s):
- Uitgave:
- ISBN:
- Druk:
Meer samenvattingen voor studieboek
-
PVL1501 ASSIGNMENT 2 QUIZ MEMO - SEMESTER 2 - 2023 - UNISA - (UNIQUE NUMBER: - 678596 ) (DISTINCTION GUARANTEED) – DUE DATE 7 SEPTEMBER 2023
-
Heaton 6th edition
-
Unisa Law of persons 1501 summaries 2022
1 beoordeling
Door: fionaramrathan • 5 maanden geleden
Verkoper
Volgen
rudolf2514
Ontvangen beoordelingen
Voorbeeld van de inhoud
LAW OF PERSONSLONGER QUESTIONS
1. Mrs Smith, an expectant mother, was injured in a motor vehicle accident.
Her child was subsequently born with cerebral palsy. As a result of the
brain damage the child will never be able to take care of herself. The
accident was caused by the sole negligence of the driver of the other
motor vehicle.
(a) What do you understand by the nasciturus fiction? (3)
If a situation arises where it would have been to the advantage
of the nasciturus if he or she had already been born, the law
protects his or her potential interests. This is done by the
implementation of the fiction that the nasciturus is regarded as
having been born at the time of his or her conception
whenever his or her interests are at stake. If it appears on a
specific case that, had the nasciturus already been born, he or
she would have had certain claims or rights, the legal position
is kept in abeyance until the nasciturus does in fact become a
person, or until it becomes certain that no person has
developed from the nasciturus. If the child is indeed born
alive, he or she acquires that rights that have been kept in
abeyance.
(b) Name the two requirements for the operation of the nasciturus
fiction. (2)
- The fetus must already have been conceived at the time
when the benefit would have accrued to him or her.
- The child must subsequently be born alive.
(c) Can the nasciturus fiction be applied in this case? Discuss with
reference to authority. (5)
It is possible that somebody's negligence may cause injuries
to the nasciturus before birth. In Pinchin v Santam Insurance,
where the facts were similar to the question under discussion,
the court had to answer the question whether a person has an
action in respect of injury inflicted on him or her while he or
she was still a fetus in his or her mother's womb. In this case
the court concluded that a fetus, if negligently injured before
birth, may claim damages from the wrongful party.
, In Pinchin v Santam Insurance the claim was unsuccessful
since it was not proved that the cerebral palsy of the fetus had
been caused by the injury sustained by the mother. Should it
be proved that Mrs Smith's child's cerebral palsy is the result
of the injuries sustained by Mrs Smith during the accident, the
nasciturus fiction will be applicable to this case.
2. Mrs X has successfully applied for a presumption of death order with
regard to her husband who has been missing for 20 years. What will the
situation be if it becomes clear that Mr X did not die? Explain the position
in a few sentences. (5)
Since the presumption of death order is rebuttable, the court which
expressed the presumption can set aside its original order if, on the
basis of further evidence, it becomes clear that the missing person
did not in fact die. This can be done on the application of any
interested person or the missing person himself or herself. In such a
case he or she may bring an action for enrichment against those who
have been enriched at his or her expense as a result of the
presumption of his or her death.
3. Vambu, a citizen of Mozambique, is an illegal immigrant in South Africa.
He has lived and worked in Hillbrow for the past two years. He wants to
acquire a domicile of choice in Hillbrow. What effect does Vambu's status
as an illegal immigrant have on his capacity to acquire a domicile of
choice in Hillbrow? Advise him. (4)
The residence relied on for the acquisition of a domicile of choice
must be lawful. Illegal immigrants can therefore not acquire a
domicile of choice in South Africa even if they have the intention to
settle permanently because their intention is unlawful. Persons who
are deported from South Africa thus also loose their domicile in this
country even if they have the intention to return because their return
would be unlawful.
Where prohibited immigrants are, however, openly permitted by the
authorities to reside in a country, they may acquire a domicile of
choice in that country. In this case, Vambu will not be able to
acquire domicile in South Africa.
4. Mr and Mrs Nkosi are married. During their marriage, Mrs Nkosi has an
affair with Mr Skosana, as a result of which a child is born. With reference
to authority, advise Mr Nkosi fully on how he should go about to rebut the
presumption pater est quem nuptiae demonstrant. (16)
In terms of the maxim pater est quem nuptiae demonstrant Mr Nkosi
will be liable for the maintenance of the child as our law recognises
, the rebuttable presumption that a child is the child of the man to
whom the mother is married.
This presumption is rebuttable however: either of the spouses can
prove that the husband is not the father of the child. This can be
done, for example, by proving that the husband is impotent or sterile.
The fact that the spouses did not indulge in sexual intercourse
during the period of conception could also be sufficient proof that
the husband is not the father of the child.
5. What do you understand by the following concepts?
(a) multilateral contract
A multilateral contract is a contract in terms of which more
than one party undertakes to render a performance. An
example of a multilateral contract is a contract of loan.
(b) undue enrichment
Undue enrichment takes place where one person gains a
patrimonial benefit at the cost of another without there being a
recognised legal ground justifying the transfer of the benefit.
(c) negotiorum gestio
Negotiorum gestio refers to the liability incurred by a minor's
parent or guardian against a third party if the minor has
incurred expenses for necessaries (e.g. food) in the parent's
absence.
It can also be defined as managing someone else's affairs to
his or her advantage without his or her knowledge.
6. Gugu, a seventeen year old minor, concludes a contract with a certain Mrs
Ndlovu, an adult, to rent a bachelor flat. In terms of the contract Gugu has
to pay Mrs Ndlovu the exorbitant amount of R4 000,00 per month rental
for the flat. Gugu's father was unaware of this contract. When Gugu later
had difficulty in paying the exorbitant rental, she phoned her father and
told him about the contract, whereupon he gave her money to pay six
months' rental.
(a) What do you understand by the concept restitutio in integrum? (1)
A prejudicial contract concluded by a minor with the
assistance of his or her guardian, can be set aside by means
of restitutio in integrum. Restitutio in integrum literally means
return to the previous condition.
, (b) List the two requirements for the application of this remedy. (2)
The requirements for this remedy are the contract should have
been concluded with the guardian's assistance, and it should
have been to the minors prejudice at the moment is was made.
(c) Can the abovementioned contract be set aside by means of the
restitutio in integrum? Answer yes or no and explain your answer
in two sentences. (3)
Yes. A minor who contracts without the assistance or consent
of his or her guardian is not liable in terms of that contract.
However, Gugu's father tacitly ratified her contract by paying
six month's rental. The contract is thus completely valid
retrospectively. Furthermore, since an exorbitant rental was
payable, it was to Gugu's detriment at the moment it was
made.
(d) Is restitutio in integrum available to a minor who fraudulently
represented himself or herself as a major? Answer yer or no. (1)
No, the remedy is not available to a minor who misrepresented
himself or herself as a major or who, in some other fraudulent
manner, persuaded the other party to contract with him or her.
(e) What is the purpose of restitutio in integrum? (1)
The purpose of the remedy is to restore the status quo ante.
This means that complete restitution from both sides must
take place, placing both parties in the position they would
have been in had they never entered into the contract.
(f) What can be recovered by this remedy? (3)
Each party must return everything received under the contract,
as well as the proceeds or any advantage derived from the
contract, and must also compensate the other party for any
loss suffered as a result of the contract.
(g) Who can seek this remedy? (3)
The minor can apply for restitution himself or herself before he
or she attains majority, or the guardian may apply on the
minor's behalf. If the guardian fails to do so, a curator ad litem
may be appointed to assist the minor.
Voordelen van het kopen van samenvattingen bij Stuvia op een rij:
Verzekerd van kwaliteit door reviews
Stuvia-klanten hebben meer dan 700.000 samenvattingen beoordeeld. Zo weet je zeker dat je de beste documenten koopt!
Snel en makkelijk kopen
Je betaalt supersnel en eenmalig met iDeal, creditcard of Stuvia-tegoed voor de samenvatting. Zonder lidmaatschap.
Focus op de essentie
Samenvattingen worden geschreven voor en door anderen. Daarom zijn de samenvattingen altijd betrouwbaar en actueel. Zo kom je snel tot de kern!
Veelgestelde vragen
Wat krijg ik als ik dit document koop?
Je krijgt een PDF, die direct beschikbaar is na je aankoop. Het gekochte document is altijd, overal en oneindig toegankelijk via je profiel.
Tevredenheidsgarantie: hoe werkt dat?
Onze tevredenheidsgarantie zorgt ervoor dat je altijd een studiedocument vindt dat goed bij je past. Je vult een formulier in en onze klantenservice regelt de rest.
Van wie koop ik deze samenvatting?
Stuvia is een marktplaats, je koop dit document dus niet van ons, maar van verkoper rudolf2514. Stuvia faciliteert de betaling aan de verkoper.
Zit ik meteen vast aan een abonnement?
Nee, je koopt alleen deze samenvatting voor €2,70. Je zit daarna nergens aan vast.
Is Stuvia te vertrouwen?
4,6 sterren op Google & Trustpilot (+1000 reviews)
Afgelopen 30 dagen zijn er 67866 samenvattingen verkocht
Opgericht in 2010, al 14 jaar dé plek om samenvattingen te kopen