100% tevredenheidsgarantie Direct beschikbaar na betaling Zowel online als in PDF Je zit nergens aan vast
logo-home
2.3 Problem 6 Summary €2,99   In winkelwagen

Samenvatting

2.3 Problem 6 Summary

 104 keer bekeken  0 keer verkocht

Summary of 2.3 Problem 6 literature and articles

Voorbeeld 2 van de 5  pagina's

  • 6 december 2021
  • 5
  • 2021/2022
  • Samenvatting
Alle documenten voor dit vak (22)
avatar-seller
lablyth
2.3 Problem 6
Logical Positivists
 Scientific statement can be distinguished from metaphysical statement by
being possible to verify

Popper
 Recognises priority of study of logic, over subjective thought processes
 Aimed to capture logical or methodological differences between scientific
differences

Popper’s falsification
Verifiability vs Falsification
 Rejects verifiability criterion as it:
o Counts existential statements as scientific though no way to prove
them false
o Counts universal statements as meaningless as they can’t be
conclusively verified: these claims are common, and observations can
show them to be false
o Verifiability criterion is not meaningful as you can’t verify it
 Falsifiability: scientific theories characterised by:
1. Regularly disagreeing with accepted views of the world based on common
sense, or prior theoretical commitments
2. Make testable claims that future observations may reveal to be false
Differences between Poppers falsifiability and verifiability:
Popper…
1. Says unfalsifiable claims can serve important roles even if we can’t ascertain
truth or falsity
2. Doesn’t believe empirical evidence can provide grounds for believing a theory
true or likely to be true
3. Science progressing not by confirmation of truth of previous claims, but as an
evolutionary model, with observations selecting against unfit theories by
falsifying them

Demarcation question
Demarcation problem- how to distinguish science from nonscience
 Response to the verifiability criterion of demarcation from logical empiricists
 Truth, justification, and belief are not the distinguishing characteristics of
knowledge
Knowledge is:
o Not justified as:
 Can’t subject theories to all possible tests
 An unconducted test could falsify theory
 Only conduct a small number of tests: what is unknown is
greater than what is actually observed
 Criticism is the best method of error elimination: we rationally
criticise our theories
 Theories that survive attempts to falsify them aren’t confirmed
 Subsequent tests may falsify them
o Not true
 Can’t be certainly or probably true
 It is verisimilitude- truth likeness
 Looks like the truth, but, but not the truth in an absolute,
final sense
o Not belief (subjective)
 Instead, is objective:

, 1. When knowledge claims are evaluated, they become objects
of criticism
2. Problems, theories, and arguments exist irrelevant of
whether someone believes in them
3. (Popper as an evolutionary epistemologist): can never know
things independent of our observations, we can know that
environment tolerates our perceptions, theories, and
movements as we’re surviving
 False theories, perceptions, movements kill
us
 Disagreed with the view at the time that pseudoscience was different from
science in that it didn’t rely on inductive, empirical methods
o Believes obvious pseudoscience often made observation/experiment
 Excludes legit science and gives some pseudoscience status of scientific
 Excludes possibility that there can be a refutable pseudoscience claim

Popper’s question: what characterises a genuinely empirical method from a pseudo
empirical method?

Falsification
 A theory is only scientific if it rules out observable states of affairs
 Test of theory is only legitimate if it attempts to falsify that theory, seeing if
states of affairs it rules out occur or not
o Recognises problem of confirmation bias
 Every good theory should have statements in two subsets:
1. Observation statements, consistent with the theory
2. Set of potential falsifiers: should test to see if any of these states of affairs
occur
“What observable state of affairs are inconsistent with the theory?”
 More precise the statement is, more falsifiable it is
o Existential statements aren’t falsifiable as they can’t observe all
possible space-time points
 Severe testing- attempt to deduce most improbably consequences of theory
and test these
o valuable
Eg. this medicine will heal all patients- test it on the most extreme
patients that it’s the least likely to heal
 Inverse relationship between theological probability of a statement and
degree of falsifiability: All mint teas are mint teas= logical probability of 1
(necessarily true), 0 degree falsifiable (don’t exclude observable states of
affairs)

Science as Problem Solving
 History of science should be taught as history of problem-situations
 Problems are the source of all scientific inquiry, scientific theories can only be
understood in terms of problem-situations
o Good inquiry makes problems into different deeper problems

Voordelen van het kopen van samenvattingen bij Stuvia op een rij:

Verzekerd van kwaliteit door reviews

Verzekerd van kwaliteit door reviews

Stuvia-klanten hebben meer dan 700.000 samenvattingen beoordeeld. Zo weet je zeker dat je de beste documenten koopt!

Snel en makkelijk kopen

Snel en makkelijk kopen

Je betaalt supersnel en eenmalig met iDeal, creditcard of Stuvia-tegoed voor de samenvatting. Zonder lidmaatschap.

Focus op de essentie

Focus op de essentie

Samenvattingen worden geschreven voor en door anderen. Daarom zijn de samenvattingen altijd betrouwbaar en actueel. Zo kom je snel tot de kern!

Veelgestelde vragen

Wat krijg ik als ik dit document koop?

Je krijgt een PDF, die direct beschikbaar is na je aankoop. Het gekochte document is altijd, overal en oneindig toegankelijk via je profiel.

Tevredenheidsgarantie: hoe werkt dat?

Onze tevredenheidsgarantie zorgt ervoor dat je altijd een studiedocument vindt dat goed bij je past. Je vult een formulier in en onze klantenservice regelt de rest.

Van wie koop ik deze samenvatting?

Stuvia is een marktplaats, je koop dit document dus niet van ons, maar van verkoper lablyth. Stuvia faciliteert de betaling aan de verkoper.

Zit ik meteen vast aan een abonnement?

Nee, je koopt alleen deze samenvatting voor €2,99. Je zit daarna nergens aan vast.

Is Stuvia te vertrouwen?

4,6 sterren op Google & Trustpilot (+1000 reviews)

Afgelopen 30 dagen zijn er 70055 samenvattingen verkocht

Opgericht in 2010, al 14 jaar dé plek om samenvattingen te kopen

Start met verkopen
€2,99
  • (0)
  Kopen