Complete SUMMARY of Chpaters 3 and 4 of 'European History' (Ba1 Social Sciences, Prof. Dr. Musliu)
19 keer bekeken 0 keer verkocht
Vak
European History
Instelling
Vrije Universiteit Brussel (VUB)
These files are complete, organized and simplified smmaries of chapters 3 and 4 of the extensive material of the course of 'European History' taught by Prof. Dr. Musliu. The two chapters summarized here are entitled: "The Restoration of Conservative Europe" and "Peace & War, International Relations...
“Despite its status as a political event, the French Revolution has been very heavily associated with
social explanations”
A. A Marxist interpretation (20th Century)
● Marxist interpretation:
o Class struggle between the Bourgeoisie and the Nobility.
o Industrial proletariat pushed the Bourgeoisie into more left-wing positions.
▪ Dialectic materialism: Constant conflict between the ones who have the means
of Production and those who haven’t
▪ Class consciousness as a catalyst of revolution: People understand the
differences between the rich/powerful and the poor/powerless. Once people
understand they have less than others, this will lead to tensions.
o Bourgeois dominance will lead to a dual conflict between the Bourgeois and the
Proletariat.
o The economy determines the social structure.
“the impossibility of explaining the Revolution by the triumph of an unidentifiable capitalist bourgeoisie
over an unidentifiable feudal aristocracy”
-Pierre Goubert, historian
● Many historians actually reject the Marxist interpretation.
Invalidated by historical evidence:
1) False distinction between ‘Feudal aristocracy’ and ‘Capitalist Bourgeoisie’
o Weakened Aristocracy
▪ Feudal system was already weakened.
▪ Loss of Privileges and sales of Noble-titles and lands.
o The Bourgeoisie and the Aristocrats weren’t that different (Have/Have not).
▪ The Aristocrat heavily invested in trade and proto-industry - not really separate
economic classes
▪ The Bourgeoisie weren’t from the poor parts of society; rentiers, traders,
land-owners, public officials, etc.
o Revolution slowed the industrialization processes
, 2) Bourgeois lack of class Consciousness
o Great variances across local cultures, not a generalized bourgeoisie - prevent from
forming a generalized/uniform class-consciousness
o Lack of mobilization, lack of uniformity (Class consciousness).
3) Bourgeoisie wasn’t in favor of a revolution - did not hold revolutionary aspirations (on
average)
o They aspired to become Nobility (and buy noble titles), not destroy them.
o Wished to preserve ‘rank and order’: maintenance of estates-system allowed them to
mark their social mobility / individual progress
B. The victory of the enlightenment ideas (1970s)
● François Furet ; penser la révolution Française ; 1978.
o Central argument = Fr. Revolution was less about social/class conflict and more a conflict
over the meaning and application of norms and ideas
o French revolution wasn’t really about the rise of the Bourgeoisie, but about the new
social contracts and form of organizations (governments).
o Popular sovereignty
▪ Language of ‘popular will’ presumes a uniformity.
▪ Impact of J-J Rousseau, (1762) Social Contract
● The general will as ‘one and invisible’.
● The general will can only be executed, not represented.
● Keith baker; Inventing the French Revolution; 1990.
o Late 18th C: Three compelling discourses.
▪ Justice: Constitution/social contract as a protection against state domination
and absolutist/arbitrary rule.
▪ Equality: Account giving by government (Challenging the Divine right to rule).
▪ Popular will: The people (not God) as the source of legitimate rule.
o Reign of Terror = led to the rise of the ‘Popular will’ ideal during the summer of 1789
▪ Revolutionaries wanted power for the popular man - executors of the “popular
will”
, ▪ Conflicting narratives could not be exposed, because they would undermine the
narrative. If there are dissenting voices, it destroys the image of a homogeneous,
popular will - exposes their fragility → had to be silenced
● Limitations of the Ideas of the Enlightenment ideas.
o Little scholarly consensus on any direct connection between the enlightenment Ideas
and the revolution.
o Ideas of enlightenment were made in a particular social environment. They weren’t
made in order to ‘make’ a revolution.
o Explanations highlight the autonomy of ideas; leaving out their social origins
o ‘New Wine in old Bottles’ (Arnold Toynbee): scepticism
▪ The revolutionaries changed the source of authority, legitimacy (God → People)
▪ BUT there were very few changes to the “estates-based” system and its
structures of oppression (only a slight readjustment/re-negotiation of the three
levels)
C. Linking social and ideational theories (late 1990s1)
● Focus on the interaction between political and social history.
o Rise of Mercantile class from the 16th C. onwards
▪ Changing economic relations and power.
▪ Rise of Upward social mobility.
o Spread of bourgeois beliefs - meritocracy
▪ Meritocracy ⬄ hereditary system.
▪ Reason ⬄ divine religion.
→ The spread of meritocratic ideals facilitated the uptake of Enlightenment Ideas such as
‘Popular sovereignty’.
2.2) A Conservative Backlash
Continental Europe after the French Revolution
● Regicide and replacement of the Monarchy by a Republic in France.
● Terror, prosecution, and bloodbaths bring political instability.
● Napoleonic Wars (1802-1815) leading to mass armies and casualties.
1
After the cold war and the societal changes that happened there, Historians used new ‘glasses’ to look back at the
French revolution and try to understand it.
Voordelen van het kopen van samenvattingen bij Stuvia op een rij:
Verzekerd van kwaliteit door reviews
Stuvia-klanten hebben meer dan 700.000 samenvattingen beoordeeld. Zo weet je zeker dat je de beste documenten koopt!
Snel en makkelijk kopen
Je betaalt supersnel en eenmalig met iDeal, creditcard of Stuvia-tegoed voor de samenvatting. Zonder lidmaatschap.
Focus op de essentie
Samenvattingen worden geschreven voor en door anderen. Daarom zijn de samenvattingen altijd betrouwbaar en actueel. Zo kom je snel tot de kern!
Veelgestelde vragen
Wat krijg ik als ik dit document koop?
Je krijgt een PDF, die direct beschikbaar is na je aankoop. Het gekochte document is altijd, overal en oneindig toegankelijk via je profiel.
Tevredenheidsgarantie: hoe werkt dat?
Onze tevredenheidsgarantie zorgt ervoor dat je altijd een studiedocument vindt dat goed bij je past. Je vult een formulier in en onze klantenservice regelt de rest.
Van wie koop ik deze samenvatting?
Stuvia is een marktplaats, je koop dit document dus niet van ons, maar van verkoper rosalievancauwenberghe. Stuvia faciliteert de betaling aan de verkoper.
Zit ik meteen vast aan een abonnement?
Nee, je koopt alleen deze samenvatting voor €4,49. Je zit daarna nergens aan vast.
