Samenvatting
Summary ALL Literature for organisational behaviour
In depth summary of literature for organisational behaviour
[Meer zien]Voorbeeld 4 van de 60 pagina's
Voorbeeld 4 van de 60 pagina's
In winkelwagengesponsord bericht van onze partner
Verkoper
Volgen
Voorbeeld van de inhoud
Farndale & Paauwe - SHRM and context: why firms want to be asdifferent as legitimately possible
Harvard model of HRM (= Beer et al):
● Describes how context (= stakeholders interests + situational factors)
influence → HRM policy choices → HRM outcomes → long term consequences
for firms, individuals, society
● Situational factor: aspects of the firms operating context
○ Eg: workforce characteristics, business strategy, management philosophy,
technology, labor markets, unions, societal values and legislation
Strategic balance theory:
● Balance between external + internal environment → need for leaders to
establish what they can and cant control in their environment
○ Need to be perceived as legitimate to access essential resources
○ Need to differentiate themselves to achieve sustainable competitive advantage
Strategic HRM SHRM:
● Organizational context, exists in:
○ 1) external environment (in which firm is operating = unions, market conditions,
labor markets, regulations, technologies)
○ 2) internal environment (= strategy, culture, prior history, structure)
Predicting performance + wellbeing:
● Mutual gains approach: both employees + employers benefit from HRM
○ By defining performance in a holistic concept of: firm financial performance +
employee wellbeing
○ Optimizes positive employment relationship
● Conflicting outcomes approach: HRM pays off in terms of firm performance but has
no/negative impact on employee wellbeing
○ So only outcome worked on is firm financial performance
● High performance work practices HPWP: increased return on assets,
decreased employee turnover → makes this managerially relevant
● Mediators: human capital + employee motivation
Contextually based human resource theory CBHRT:
● HRM cannot be understood as a stand-alone phenomenon → HRM is part of a
firm and the broader society/operating context
● Context: series of situational opportunities and constraints; what has preceded the
development of this system
Contextual strategic HRM framework:
● Model of interrelationships between HRM systems + the firms in which they are formed
, ○ 1) balance of performance outcome measurement of firm financial performance +
employee well-being
○ 2) context-centric perspective on origins + outcomes of systems
● Macro-level context: influences the formation of the SHRM system
● mezzo-/micro-level process: SHRM system is translated into various outcomes
at the employee level → affect macro-level through organizational + societal
level outcomes
● 3 broad contextual mechanisms:
○ 1) competitive mechanism: how a firm positions itself in the marketplace based
on it's products or services, competitors in the market and technology
■ Resource based view RBV: how firms build unique resources that lead to
the creation of valuable internal organizational capabilities (eg speed,
efficiency, innovation)
○ 2) institutional mechanism: based on social, political, cultural, legal,
regulatory aspects in the environment in which the firm is operating (=
norms + values + institutionalization) → these alter outcomes of
competitive mechanisms because they are part of the externalized
context
■ Neo-institutional theory: HRM system embedded in firm needs to
be legitimate within it's context in a specific organization → so
theres no one best way to do something in all contexts
● → need for external legitimacy: being compliant with
appropriate regulations + as a fair employer → to gain
access to necessary resources
○ 3) heritage mechanism: path dependency associated with the way in which a firm
has operated in the past, determining future activities
■ Can constrain or facilitate organizational activities
○ → in ideal situation all three mechanisms are aligned to be mutually
reinforcing
■ Open systems perspective: input-transformation-output (= if you think that
only these three mechanisms are prior to the outcome)
■ However: firms have multiple actors with their own desires,
abilities and agendas → creates the leeway
● Organization fit:
○ = achieving a stable link between one system and another
○ However: due to the world being dynamic → SHRM system needs to
balance fit + flexibility → to achieve sustained competitive advantage
■ So: achieving fit = short term success; dynamic fit = to cope with changes
to achieve long term success
Paauwe & Richardson:
● HRM outcomes: satisfaction, motivation, turnover
● Organization outcomes: productivity, customer satisfaction, sales, profit
,Black box:
● Definition: what are the mechanisms that help to explain the link between HRM practices
and policies on the one hand and organization performance on the other?
Paauwe & Farndale - Strategy, HRM, and performance
Chapter 5 - HRM and performance
Goal of article: can a focus on well-being + financial performance be achieved simultaneously or
are they competing goals
HRM = human resource management
● Two original models:
○ Harvard model:
■ Considered more of a broader stakeholder approach
○ Michigan school model:
■ Considered more functional, managerial approach to HRM
● HRM outcomes: eg satisfaction, motivation, turnover
● Organization outcomes: eg productivity, customer satisfaction, sales, profit
Association HRM + performance:
● Links how people are managed with organizational goals
● Linking HRM and performance according to Guest 1997:
HRM HRM HRM Behavior Performan Financial
strategy practices outcomes outcomes ce outcomes
outcomes
Differentiati Selection Commitme Effort/ High: Profits
on nt motivation Productivit
(innovation Training y, quality,
) innovation
Focus Appraisal Quality Cooperatio Return on
(quality) n investment
Rewards (ROI)
Cost (cost- Job design Flexibility Involveme Low:
reduction) nt absence,
labour
Involveme Organizati turnover,
nt onal conflict
citizenship customer
Status and complaints
security
● Performance outcomes (Dyer and Reeves 1995):
○ a) financial: eg profit, sales, market share, Tobins q, GRATE
■ Problem:
, ● Financial indicators can be influenced by many internal/external
organizational factors that have nothing to do with employee and
related skills, or human capital pool
● Distance between eg market value/profit and HRM can
bee too large, could be subject to other business
interventions (eg research and development, marketing
strategies, economic trends) → thats why we need HRM
indicators which are closer to the HRM practice
○ b) organizational: eg output measures such as productivity, quality, efficiency
○ c) HRM: eg employee attitudes and behaviors, such as satisfaction, commitment,
intention to quit
■ Objective: employee turnover + absenteeism
■ Subjective:
● Positive: commitment, trust in management, job satisfaction
● Negative: stress and job-home spillover
● Moves away from ‘personnel management’ → to managing people closer to
corporate strategy + business priorities
○ Requirements: more line management + more focus on HRM outcomes
(commitment, quality, flexibility → better job performance, less
absenteeism, less turnover → more cost-effective + competitive
advantage)
● Perspectives to study it from (individual-organizational levels):
○ Organizational behavior
○ Sociology
○ Economics
○ Industrial relations (IR)
● Challenges in studying field:
○ Missing elements
○ Inappropriate theorizing, regarding HRM & performance concepts
○ Lack of insight in underlying mechanisms/processes explaining why HRM
systems contribute to performance (= black box phenomenon)
■ Black box problem (Paauwe, 2015): what are the mechanisms that help
explain the link between HRM practices and policies on the one hand,
and organization performance on the other (or: an unclear mechanism
going on between the input and output of a relationship)
●
Voordelen van het kopen van samenvattingen bij Stuvia op een rij:
Verzekerd van kwaliteit door reviews
Stuvia-klanten hebben meer dan 700.000 samenvattingen beoordeeld. Zo weet je zeker dat je de beste documenten koopt!
Snel en makkelijk kopen
Je betaalt supersnel en eenmalig met iDeal, creditcard of Stuvia-tegoed voor de samenvatting. Zonder lidmaatschap.
Focus op de essentie
Samenvattingen worden geschreven voor en door anderen. Daarom zijn de samenvattingen altijd betrouwbaar en actueel. Zo kom je snel tot de kern!
Veelgestelde vragen
Wat krijg ik als ik dit document koop?
Je krijgt een PDF, die direct beschikbaar is na je aankoop. Het gekochte document is altijd, overal en oneindig toegankelijk via je profiel.
Tevredenheidsgarantie: hoe werkt dat?
Onze tevredenheidsgarantie zorgt ervoor dat je altijd een studiedocument vindt dat goed bij je past. Je vult een formulier in en onze klantenservice regelt de rest.
Van wie koop ik deze samenvatting?
Stuvia is een marktplaats, je koop dit document dus niet van ons, maar van verkoper julianaijlstra. Stuvia faciliteert de betaling aan de verkoper.
Zit ik meteen vast aan een abonnement?
Nee, je koopt alleen deze samenvatting voor €7,99. Je zit daarna nergens aan vast.
Is Stuvia te vertrouwen?
4,6 sterren op Google & Trustpilot (+1000 reviews)
Afgelopen 30 dagen zijn er 72042 samenvattingen verkocht
Opgericht in 2010, al 14 jaar dé plek om samenvattingen te kopen
