100% tevredenheidsgarantie Direct beschikbaar na betaling Zowel online als in PDF Je zit nergens aan vast
logo-home
LJU4804 ASSIGNMENT 1 MEMO - SEMESTER 1 - 2023 - UNISA - (DETAILED ANSWERS WITH FOOTNOTES - DISTINCTION GUARANTEED) €7,93   In winkelwagen

Tentamen (uitwerkingen)

LJU4804 ASSIGNMENT 1 MEMO - SEMESTER 1 - 2023 - UNISA - (DETAILED ANSWERS WITH FOOTNOTES - DISTINCTION GUARANTEED)

 59 keer bekeken  1 aankoop
  • Vak
  • Instelling
  • Boek

LJU4804 ASSIGNMENT 1 MEMO - SEMESTER 1 - 2023 - UNISA - (DETAILED ANSWERS WITH FOOTNOTES - DISTINCTION GUARANTEED) Mr and Mrs Hendricks got married in Madagascar in December 1999. At the time of entering into the marriage they were both Namibian citizens, domiciled in England. Mrs Hendricks move...

[Meer zien]

Voorbeeld 2 van de 13  pagina's

  • 14 maart 2023
  • 13
  • 2022/2023
  • Tentamen (uitwerkingen)
  • Vragen en antwoorden
avatar-seller
Tutors you can trust. Voted “BEST
SELLING” memos for the year 2021/2022.




LJU4804
Private International Law

ASSIGNMENT 1 MEMO
SEMESTER 1 - 2023
UNIQUE NUMBER:-
Due Date :- 31 March 2023
Includes Footnotes and/or Bibliography

QUESTION 1


Mr and Mrs Hendricks got married in Madagascar in December 1999. At the time of entering into the marriage they
were both Namibian citizens, domiciled in England. Mrs Hendricks moved to London, England in 1997 to pursue a
modelling career. Mr Hendricks took up a permanent position as an engineer in London in 1998 and established a
domicile there. In 2001, the parties relocated to Pretoria (South Africa) and became domiciled there. The reason for
the relocation was that Mrs Hendricks was offered a long-term modelling contract by a large South African clothing
company. In 2017, Mr Hendricks instituted divorce proceedings against Mrs Hendricks in the North Gauteng High
Court.


1.1 Which legal system applies to the material validity of the marriage according to the principles of South African
private international law? (2)


Question Continues..

Disclaimer
Extreme care has been used by our Tutors to draft this document, however the contents are provided “as is” without any representations
or warranties, express or implied. This document is to be used for comparison, research and reference purposes ONLY. No part of this
document may be reproduced, resold or transmitted in any form or by any means without prior written permission from the Author. –
LLB EXAMPACKS & TUTORIALS.



PAST PAPERS & MEMOS, ASSIGNMENT MEMOS, NOTES, SUMMARIES & TUITONS.
Cell: 074 074 3729 Email: llbexampacks@gmail.com
Fax: 086 096 5452 www.llbexampacksandtutorials.co.za

, Mr and Mrs Hendricks got married in Madagascar in December 1999. At the time of
entering into the marriage they were both Namibian citizens, domiciled in England.
Mrs Hendricks moved to London, England in 1997 to pursue a modelling career. Mr
Hendricks took up a permanent position as an engineer in London in 1998 and
established a domicile there. In 2001, the parties relocated to Pretoria (South
Africa) and became domiciled there. The reason for the relocation was that Mrs
Hendricks was offered a long-term modelling contract by a large South African
clothing company. In 2017, Mr Hendricks instituted divorce proceedings against
Mrs Hendricks in the North Gauteng High Court.



1.1 Which legal system applies to the material validity of the marriage according to
the principles of South African private international law? (2)


In terms of the rules of private international law the material validity of marriage is
governed by the lex loci celebrationis that is the law of marriage celebration. The law of
marriage celebration refers to the place where the marriage was celebrated. By
virtue of the given set of facts the marriage was concluded in Mauritius meaning.
The legal system would then be Mauritian law. 1


1.2 Mrs Hendricks gave Mr Hendricks a BMW X5 vehicle (fully paid in cash by Mrs
Hendricks) in 2016. After the divorce proceedings were instituted, Mrs Hendricks
disputed the validity of this gift / donation. In terms of English law, donations
between spouses are regarded as a proprietary consequence of marriage but in
terms of South African law, donations between spouses are classified as a
personal consequence of marriage.


1.2.1 Which legal system will be applied to the validity of the gift if the via media
approach to classification is used? Motivate your answer, but you do NOT have to




1 Friedman v Friedman’s Executors and Others 1922 43 NLR 259.

Voordelen van het kopen van samenvattingen bij Stuvia op een rij:

Verzekerd van kwaliteit door reviews

Verzekerd van kwaliteit door reviews

Stuvia-klanten hebben meer dan 700.000 samenvattingen beoordeeld. Zo weet je zeker dat je de beste documenten koopt!

Snel en makkelijk kopen

Snel en makkelijk kopen

Je betaalt supersnel en eenmalig met iDeal, creditcard of Stuvia-tegoed voor de samenvatting. Zonder lidmaatschap.

Focus op de essentie

Focus op de essentie

Samenvattingen worden geschreven voor en door anderen. Daarom zijn de samenvattingen altijd betrouwbaar en actueel. Zo kom je snel tot de kern!

Veelgestelde vragen

Wat krijg ik als ik dit document koop?

Je krijgt een PDF, die direct beschikbaar is na je aankoop. Het gekochte document is altijd, overal en oneindig toegankelijk via je profiel.

Tevredenheidsgarantie: hoe werkt dat?

Onze tevredenheidsgarantie zorgt ervoor dat je altijd een studiedocument vindt dat goed bij je past. Je vult een formulier in en onze klantenservice regelt de rest.

Van wie koop ik deze samenvatting?

Stuvia is een marktplaats, je koop dit document dus niet van ons, maar van verkoper LLBExampacksAndTutorials. Stuvia faciliteert de betaling aan de verkoper.

Zit ik meteen vast aan een abonnement?

Nee, je koopt alleen deze samenvatting voor €7,93. Je zit daarna nergens aan vast.

Is Stuvia te vertrouwen?

4,6 sterren op Google & Trustpilot (+1000 reviews)

Afgelopen 30 dagen zijn er 73314 samenvattingen verkocht

Opgericht in 2010, al 14 jaar dé plek om samenvattingen te kopen

Start met verkopen
€7,93  1x  verkocht
  • (0)
  Kopen