College aantekeningen

Rejecting Minorities/Understanding prejudice (video)colleges aantekeningen

0 keer verkocht

Vak
Rejecting Minorities

Instelling
Universiteit Utrecht (UU)

Aantekeningen van alle colleges en videocolleges van het vak rejecting minorities jaar 2022/2023, later hernoemd naar Understanding Prejudice maar nog steeds hetzelfde vak

[Meer zien]

Voorbeeld 4 van de 36 pagina's

Bekijk voorbeeld

Geupload op 19 september 2023
Aantal pagina's 36
Geschreven in 2022/2023
Type College aantekeningen
Docent(en) Tobias stark
Bevat Alle colleges

Volgen

rosavleemingh Lid sinds 3 jaar 30 documenten verkocht

Video lecture Social Identity Theory

Research philosophy
• Different disciplines have different research philosophies
• Here: Problem-driven research
1. Problem: What do we want to know?
2. Theory: How does a theory explain the problem?
3. Research: Test the predictions made by the theory.

Problem-based research questions
• Problem = societal issue & a related question
• Related question= research question: judgment and value free, as specific as possible
– Descriptive question: To what extent do we observe a problem?
– Trend question: How did the problem change over time?
– Comparison question: To what extent are there differences within a problem (e.g.,
between areas or groups)?
– Explanation question (why-question): Why does this problem exist? Why did the
problem change? Why do we observe differences?

Group formation: why do we form groups, why are groups necessary?
• Categorization process is a central component of Social Identity Theory
– Evolutionary perspective: necessary to distinguish friend and enemy
– Cognitive perspective: necessary to process large amount of information

Categorization
• People actively search for information.
• People simplify processing all that information by ignoring certain differences and
emphasizing (or even exaggerating) certain similarities of that information. We stuff people
into different groups

SIT experiment 1: non-social stimuli
Tajfel: how do people deal with categories?
People have to rate non-social stimuli. 8 lines, from long to short, categorized into 2
categories A and B
What happened is people overestimated the differences between the two groups, and
underestimated the differences within each group.

> Can this be generalized to social stimuli?
SIT experiment 2: Minimal group experiment Goal: manipulate social categorization as an
independent variable
• Step 1: Generate social categorization on the basis of a trivial criterion, create new
categories; don't use existing ones and manipulate whether people do or do not belong (no
meaning)
• Step 2: Let participants give rewards to members of their own and the other group

,Conclusion minimal-group experiments
• Group formation leads to discriminatory behavior (ingroup favoritism)
• Even if groups are formed on basis of a trivial (meaningless) category
• Tajfel: “Social categorization per se is a sufficient condition for the development of
intergroup bias” (discrimination in favor of the own group)

> Self interest trumps all of these factors.
> When the grouping is NOT meaningless, the same thing happens.

SIT: four central concepts
1. Social categorization
2. Social identity
3. Social comparison
4. Psychological group distinctiveness

Social categorization
• “process of bringing together social objects or events in groups which are equivalent with
regard to an individual’s actions, intentions and system of beliefs” (Tajfel, 1981, p. 254).
• Similar to categorization of non-social stimuli:
– Use of any characteristic available
– Perceive more similarity within and more difference between categories
• Not just the basis of how we perceive the world, but also who we perceive ourselves…

Social Identity
Social identity is based on the realization that one belongs to a social category and the
positive or negative evaluation associated with this membership.
• Are divisive and exclusive (you either belong or you do not)
• Are context dependent (you identify with different groups in different situations)
• Have a cultural component: this turns a category into an identity (people associate some
normative behavior with the members of this group)
• Include a judgment of the nature of people in a certain category
> This is more than a minimal group. Social identities may thus have even more powerful
consequences in intergroup interaction!

Social comparison
• Through social comparison with other groups, people try to evaluate their group’s relative
status
• People strive for a positive social identity
– People are motivated to belong to a positively evaluated group (this can result in
making the other group out to be more negative than they really are, to ensure your own
superiority)
• They value their own group more than other groups (social identification versus contra-
identification)

Psychological group distinctiveness
• Need for belonging to a positively evaluated group but also need to be distinct from others
• People thus try to achieve a position of their group that is distinct and positive

,> Cognitive alternatives: do you believe that the position of your group can be changed?

Summary
• Social identity theory
– Helps understand positive and negative social relationships
– Explains behavior of dominant and subordinate group
– Allows clear hypothesis about group members’ behavior if they face negative social
identity
– Is broadly applicable

Video lecture Realistic Group Conflict Theory
Classical explanations of prejudice
• Early explanations of prejudice focused on personality characteristics
– Allport: the prejudiced personality is ego-alienated (cannot live with themselves),
longs for definitiveness, for safety, and authority
– Authoritarian personality
• But: “Prejudice is fundamentally a matter of relationship between racial groups.” (Blumer
1958)

Foundation of RGCT: Robbers Cave Experiment > Muzafer Sherif
• How do group conflicts develop?
• How can we solve group conflicts?

Study design:
• 22 boys (aged 12) sent to a summer camp

, • Don’t know each other
• Same social background
• Random allocation to 2 groups who are unaware of each other’s existence
• 3 phases
Maximal group experiment: great external validity due to “real life” setting

Phase 1: Group formation, friendships and group names developed.
Phase 2: Group competition, the groups were introduced to each other and competition
started
> Name calling, fights, group favoritism, etc. started.

Sherif’s conflict theory

Proves the old approaches wrong
• Randomization, same background
• Negative attitudes and behavior toward an out-group not by dysfunctional individuals, it is
not a matter of personality
• No history of group conflict necessary
• No need for a strong leader (authority) who wants to dominate others

What is needed for prejudice and conflicts to emerge?
• Social categorization
– On basis of shared characteristics
– In-group-favoritism (“we” against “them”)
• Competition over resources
– Outgroup-derogation (outgroup-homogeneity)

Phase 3: Integration
• Get-to-know activities of both groups (watch a movie, shooting firework crackers) did not
work.
Shared activities on urgent problems that affected both groups the same, and could not be
ignored.
– Fix water reservoir
– Help food delivery truck back on the road

Sherif on conflict reduction
• Conflict theory predicts when group conflicts will occur
– Group competition over scarce resources
• Conflict theory also suggests how conflicts can be solved
– Work on common (important) goal

Dit zijn jouw voordelen als je samenvattingen koopt bij Stuvia:

Bewezen kwaliteit door reviews

Studenten hebben al meer dan 850.000 samenvattingen beoordeeld. Zo weet jij zeker dat je de beste keuze maakt!

In een paar klikken geregeld

Geen gedoe — betaal gewoon eenmalig met iDeal, creditcard of je Stuvia-tegoed en je bent klaar. Geen abonnement nodig.

Direct to-the-point

Studenten maken samenvattingen voor studenten. Dat betekent: actuele inhoud waar jij écht wat aan hebt. Geen overbodige details!

Veelgestelde vragen

Wat krijg ik als ik dit document koop?

Je krijgt een PDF, die direct beschikbaar is na je aankoop. Het gekochte document is altijd, overal en oneindig toegankelijk via je profiel.

Tevredenheidsgarantie: hoe werkt dat?

Onze tevredenheidsgarantie zorgt ervoor dat je altijd een studiedocument vindt dat goed bij je past. Je vult een formulier in en onze klantenservice regelt de rest.